mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-14 07:06:50 +07:00
arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses
When we enable pointer authentication in the kernel, LR values saved to the stack will have a PAC which we must strip in order to retrieve the real return address. Strip PACs when unwinding the stack in order to account for this. When function graph tracer is used with patchable-function-entry then return_to_handler will also have pac bits so strip it too. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> [Amit: Re-position ptrauth_strip_insn_pac, comment] Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
689eae42af
commit
04ad99a0b1
@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm/irq.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/pointer_auth.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/stack_pointer.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
|
||||
if (tsk->ret_stack &&
|
||||
(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
|
||||
(ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc) == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
|
||||
struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is a case where function graph tracer has
|
||||
@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
|
||||
|
||||
frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Frames created upon entry from EL0 have NULL FP and PC values, so
|
||||
* don't bother reporting these. Frames created by __noreturn functions
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user