linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c

127 lines
2.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
*
* Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
*/
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "i915_active.h"
#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
#include "gem/i915_gem_object.h"
#include "i915_globals.h"
#include "i915_request.h"
#include "i915_scheduler.h"
#include "i915_vma.h"
static LIST_HEAD(globals);
drm/i915: Use static allocation for i915_globals_park() In order to avoid the malloc inside i915_globals_park() occurring underneath a lock connected to the shrinker (thus causing circular lockdeps warnings), move the rcu_worker to a global. <4> [39.085073] ====================================================== <4> [39.085273] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [39.085552] 5.1.0-rc3-CI-Trybot_4088+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [39.085752] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [39.085949] kswapd0/32 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [39.086121] 00000000004b5f91 (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.086493] but task is already holding lock: <4> [39.086682] 00000000dd009a9a (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 <4> [39.086910] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [39.087139] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [39.087356] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [39.087604] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30 <4> [39.087785] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290 <4> [39.087998] i915_globals_park+0x22/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.088478] idle_work_handler+0x1df/0x220 [i915] <4> [39.089016] process_one_work+0x245/0x610 <4> [39.089447] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4> [39.089956] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.090374] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4> [39.090868] -> #1 (wakeref#4){+.+.}: <4> [39.091569] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.092054] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.092521] intel_gt_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.093047] intel_engine_park+0xeb/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [39.093514] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x10/0x30 [i915] <4> [39.094062] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.094547] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.095110] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.095587] i915_gem_wait_for_idle.part.22+0xb2/0xf0 [i915] <4> [39.096142] switch_to_kernel_context_sync+0x2a/0x70 [i915] <4> [39.096633] i915_gem_init+0x59c/0x9c0 [i915] <4> [39.097174] i915_driver_load+0xd96/0x1880 [i915] <4> [39.097640] i915_pci_probe+0x29/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.098145] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x120 <4> [39.098607] really_probe+0xf3/0x3e0 <4> [39.099031] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120 <4> [39.099599] device_driver_attach+0x4b/0x50 <4> [39.100033] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4> [39.100525] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4> [39.100954] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210 <4> [39.101441] driver_register+0x56/0xe0 <4> [39.101891] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0 <4> [39.102319] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea <4> [39.102805] load_module+0x2701/0x29e0 <4> [39.103231] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [39.103727] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [39.104153] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [39.104736] -> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}: <4> [39.105437] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4> [39.105923] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.106345] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.106897] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.107375] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.107930] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.108412] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.108934] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915] <4> [39.109431] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x59/0x130 [i915] <4> [39.109884] do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x3e0 <4> [39.110380] shrink_slab+0x228/0x2c0 <4> [39.110810] shrink_node+0x177/0x460 <4> [39.111317] balance_pgdat+0x239/0x580 <4> [39.111743] kswapd+0x186/0x570 <4> [39.112221] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.112641] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190408091728.20207-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-08 16:17:02 +07:00
static atomic_t active;
static atomic_t epoch;
static struct park_work {
struct rcu_work work;
int epoch;
} park;
static void i915_globals_shrink(void)
{
struct i915_global *global;
/*
* kmem_cache_shrink() discards empty slabs and reorders partially
* filled slabs to prioritise allocating from the mostly full slabs,
* with the aim of reducing fragmentation.
*/
list_for_each_entry(global, &globals, link)
global->shrink();
}
static void __i915_globals_park(struct work_struct *work)
{
/* Confirm nothing woke up in the last grace period */
if (park.epoch == atomic_read(&epoch))
i915_globals_shrink();
}
void __init i915_global_register(struct i915_global *global)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!global->shrink);
GEM_BUG_ON(!global->exit);
list_add_tail(&global->link, &globals);
}
static void __i915_globals_cleanup(void)
{
struct i915_global *global, *next;
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(global, next, &globals, link)
global->exit();
}
static __initconst int (* const initfn[])(void) = {
i915_global_active_init,
i915_global_buddy_init,
i915_global_context_init,
i915_global_gem_context_init,
i915_global_objects_init,
i915_global_request_init,
i915_global_scheduler_init,
i915_global_vma_init,
};
int __init i915_globals_init(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(initfn); i++) {
int err;
err = initfn[i]();
if (err) {
__i915_globals_cleanup();
return err;
}
}
drm/i915: Use static allocation for i915_globals_park() In order to avoid the malloc inside i915_globals_park() occurring underneath a lock connected to the shrinker (thus causing circular lockdeps warnings), move the rcu_worker to a global. <4> [39.085073] ====================================================== <4> [39.085273] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [39.085552] 5.1.0-rc3-CI-Trybot_4088+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [39.085752] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [39.085949] kswapd0/32 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [39.086121] 00000000004b5f91 (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.086493] but task is already holding lock: <4> [39.086682] 00000000dd009a9a (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 <4> [39.086910] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [39.087139] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [39.087356] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [39.087604] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30 <4> [39.087785] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290 <4> [39.087998] i915_globals_park+0x22/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.088478] idle_work_handler+0x1df/0x220 [i915] <4> [39.089016] process_one_work+0x245/0x610 <4> [39.089447] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4> [39.089956] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.090374] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4> [39.090868] -> #1 (wakeref#4){+.+.}: <4> [39.091569] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.092054] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.092521] intel_gt_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.093047] intel_engine_park+0xeb/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [39.093514] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x10/0x30 [i915] <4> [39.094062] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.094547] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.095110] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.095587] i915_gem_wait_for_idle.part.22+0xb2/0xf0 [i915] <4> [39.096142] switch_to_kernel_context_sync+0x2a/0x70 [i915] <4> [39.096633] i915_gem_init+0x59c/0x9c0 [i915] <4> [39.097174] i915_driver_load+0xd96/0x1880 [i915] <4> [39.097640] i915_pci_probe+0x29/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.098145] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x120 <4> [39.098607] really_probe+0xf3/0x3e0 <4> [39.099031] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120 <4> [39.099599] device_driver_attach+0x4b/0x50 <4> [39.100033] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4> [39.100525] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4> [39.100954] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210 <4> [39.101441] driver_register+0x56/0xe0 <4> [39.101891] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0 <4> [39.102319] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea <4> [39.102805] load_module+0x2701/0x29e0 <4> [39.103231] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [39.103727] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [39.104153] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [39.104736] -> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}: <4> [39.105437] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4> [39.105923] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.106345] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.106897] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.107375] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.107930] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.108412] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.108934] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915] <4> [39.109431] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x59/0x130 [i915] <4> [39.109884] do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x3e0 <4> [39.110380] shrink_slab+0x228/0x2c0 <4> [39.110810] shrink_node+0x177/0x460 <4> [39.111317] balance_pgdat+0x239/0x580 <4> [39.111743] kswapd+0x186/0x570 <4> [39.112221] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.112641] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190408091728.20207-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-08 16:17:02 +07:00
INIT_RCU_WORK(&park.work, __i915_globals_park);
return 0;
}
void i915_globals_park(void)
{
/*
* Defer shrinking the global slab caches (and other work) until
* after a RCU grace period has completed with no activity. This
* is to try and reduce the latency impact on the consumers caused
* by us shrinking the caches the same time as they are trying to
* allocate, with the assumption being that if we idle long enough
* for an RCU grace period to elapse since the last use, it is likely
* to be longer until we need the caches again.
*/
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&active))
return;
drm/i915: Use static allocation for i915_globals_park() In order to avoid the malloc inside i915_globals_park() occurring underneath a lock connected to the shrinker (thus causing circular lockdeps warnings), move the rcu_worker to a global. <4> [39.085073] ====================================================== <4> [39.085273] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [39.085552] 5.1.0-rc3-CI-Trybot_4088+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [39.085752] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [39.085949] kswapd0/32 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [39.086121] 00000000004b5f91 (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.086493] but task is already holding lock: <4> [39.086682] 00000000dd009a9a (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 <4> [39.086910] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [39.087139] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [39.087356] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [39.087604] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30 <4> [39.087785] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290 <4> [39.087998] i915_globals_park+0x22/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.088478] idle_work_handler+0x1df/0x220 [i915] <4> [39.089016] process_one_work+0x245/0x610 <4> [39.089447] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4> [39.089956] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.090374] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4> [39.090868] -> #1 (wakeref#4){+.+.}: <4> [39.091569] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.092054] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.092521] intel_gt_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.093047] intel_engine_park+0xeb/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [39.093514] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x10/0x30 [i915] <4> [39.094062] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.094547] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.095110] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.095587] i915_gem_wait_for_idle.part.22+0xb2/0xf0 [i915] <4> [39.096142] switch_to_kernel_context_sync+0x2a/0x70 [i915] <4> [39.096633] i915_gem_init+0x59c/0x9c0 [i915] <4> [39.097174] i915_driver_load+0xd96/0x1880 [i915] <4> [39.097640] i915_pci_probe+0x29/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.098145] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x120 <4> [39.098607] really_probe+0xf3/0x3e0 <4> [39.099031] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120 <4> [39.099599] device_driver_attach+0x4b/0x50 <4> [39.100033] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4> [39.100525] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4> [39.100954] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210 <4> [39.101441] driver_register+0x56/0xe0 <4> [39.101891] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0 <4> [39.102319] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea <4> [39.102805] load_module+0x2701/0x29e0 <4> [39.103231] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [39.103727] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [39.104153] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [39.104736] -> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}: <4> [39.105437] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4> [39.105923] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.106345] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.106897] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.107375] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.107930] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.108412] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.108934] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915] <4> [39.109431] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x59/0x130 [i915] <4> [39.109884] do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x3e0 <4> [39.110380] shrink_slab+0x228/0x2c0 <4> [39.110810] shrink_node+0x177/0x460 <4> [39.111317] balance_pgdat+0x239/0x580 <4> [39.111743] kswapd+0x186/0x570 <4> [39.112221] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.112641] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190408091728.20207-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-08 16:17:02 +07:00
park.epoch = atomic_inc_return(&epoch);
queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &park.work);
}
void i915_globals_unpark(void)
{
atomic_inc(&epoch);
atomic_inc(&active);
}
void __exit i915_globals_exit(void)
{
/* Flush any residual park_work */
drm/i915: Use static allocation for i915_globals_park() In order to avoid the malloc inside i915_globals_park() occurring underneath a lock connected to the shrinker (thus causing circular lockdeps warnings), move the rcu_worker to a global. <4> [39.085073] ====================================================== <4> [39.085273] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [39.085552] 5.1.0-rc3-CI-Trybot_4088+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [39.085752] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [39.085949] kswapd0/32 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [39.086121] 00000000004b5f91 (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.086493] but task is already holding lock: <4> [39.086682] 00000000dd009a9a (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 <4> [39.086910] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [39.087139] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [39.087356] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [39.087604] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30 <4> [39.087785] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290 <4> [39.087998] i915_globals_park+0x22/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.088478] idle_work_handler+0x1df/0x220 [i915] <4> [39.089016] process_one_work+0x245/0x610 <4> [39.089447] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4> [39.089956] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.090374] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4> [39.090868] -> #1 (wakeref#4){+.+.}: <4> [39.091569] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.092054] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.092521] intel_gt_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.093047] intel_engine_park+0xeb/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [39.093514] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x10/0x30 [i915] <4> [39.094062] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.094547] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.095110] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.095587] i915_gem_wait_for_idle.part.22+0xb2/0xf0 [i915] <4> [39.096142] switch_to_kernel_context_sync+0x2a/0x70 [i915] <4> [39.096633] i915_gem_init+0x59c/0x9c0 [i915] <4> [39.097174] i915_driver_load+0xd96/0x1880 [i915] <4> [39.097640] i915_pci_probe+0x29/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.098145] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x120 <4> [39.098607] really_probe+0xf3/0x3e0 <4> [39.099031] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120 <4> [39.099599] device_driver_attach+0x4b/0x50 <4> [39.100033] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4> [39.100525] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4> [39.100954] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210 <4> [39.101441] driver_register+0x56/0xe0 <4> [39.101891] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0 <4> [39.102319] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea <4> [39.102805] load_module+0x2701/0x29e0 <4> [39.103231] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [39.103727] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [39.104153] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [39.104736] -> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}: <4> [39.105437] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4> [39.105923] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.106345] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.106897] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.107375] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.107930] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.108412] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.108934] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915] <4> [39.109431] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x59/0x130 [i915] <4> [39.109884] do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x3e0 <4> [39.110380] shrink_slab+0x228/0x2c0 <4> [39.110810] shrink_node+0x177/0x460 <4> [39.111317] balance_pgdat+0x239/0x580 <4> [39.111743] kswapd+0x186/0x570 <4> [39.112221] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.112641] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190408091728.20207-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-08 16:17:02 +07:00
atomic_inc(&epoch);
flush_rcu_work(&park.work);
__i915_globals_cleanup();
/* And ensure that our DESTROY_BY_RCU slabs are truly destroyed */
rcu_barrier();
}