linux_dsm_epyc7002/arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig

48 lines
972 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

menuconfig ARCH_SIRF
ARM: use "depends on" for SoC configs instead of "if" after prompt Many ARM sub-architectures use prompts followed by "if" conditional, but it is wrong. Please notice the difference between config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 and config ARCH_FOO bool "Foo SoCs" depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 These two are *not* equivalent! In the former statement, it is not ARCH_FOO, but its prompt that depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7. So, it is completely valid that ARCH_FOO is selected by another, but ARCH_MULTI_V7 is still disabled. As it is not unmet dependency, Kconfig never warns. This is probably not what you want. The former should be used only when you need to do so, and you really understand what you are doing. (In most cases, it should be wrong!) For enabling/disabling sub-architectures, the latter is always correct. As a good side effect, this commit fixes some entries over 80 columns (mach-imx, mach-integrator, mach-mbevu). [Arnd: I note that there is not really a bug here, according to the discussion that followed, but I can see value in being consistent and in making the lines shorter] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@piap.pl> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2015-11-16 10:06:10 +07:00
bool "CSR SiRF"
depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
select RESET_CONTROLLER
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
select NO_IOPORT_MAP
select REGMAP
select PINCTRL
select PINCTRL_SIRF
help
Support for CSR SiRFprimaII/Marco/Polo platforms
if ARCH_SIRF
comment "CSR SiRF atlas6/primaII/Atlas7 Specific Features"
config ARCH_ATLAS6
bool "CSR SiRFSoC ATLAS6 ARM Cortex A9 Platform"
default y
select SIRF_IRQ
help
Support for CSR SiRFSoC ARM Cortex A9 Platform
config ARCH_ATLAS7
bool "CSR SiRFSoC ATLAS7 ARM Cortex A7 Platform"
default y
select ARM_GIC
select CPU_V7
select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
help
Support for CSR SiRFSoC ARM Cortex A7 Platform
config ARCH_PRIMA2
bool "CSR SiRFSoC PRIMA2 ARM Cortex A9 Platform"
default y
select SIRF_IRQ
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically As suggested by Andrew Morton: This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items (header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the end of the list. Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list. lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was created by the following perl: while (<>) { while (/\\\s*$/) { $_ .= <>; } undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/; if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) { if (defined($selects{$1})) { if ($selects{$1} eq $_) { print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n"; } else { print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n". "\tOld: $selects{$1}\n". "\tNew: $_\n"; exit 1; } } $selects{$1} = $_; next; } if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or /^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) { foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) { print "$selects{$k}"; } undef %selects; } print; } if (%selects) { foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) { print "$selects{$k}"; } } It found two duplicates: Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat of two lines. We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen, Linus and Sekhar.) Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 23:12:25 +07:00
select ZONE_DMA
help
Support for CSR SiRFSoC ARM Cortex A9 Platform
config SIRF_IRQ
bool
endif