linux_dsm_epyc7002/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c

350 lines
9.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* entry_from_vm86.c - tests kernel entries from vm86 mode
* Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Andrew Lutomirski
*
* This exercises a few paths that need to special-case vm86 mode.
*
* GPL v2.
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/signal.h>
#include <sys/ucontext.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/vm86.h>
static unsigned long load_addr = 0x10000;
static int nerrs = 0;
static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
int flags)
{
struct sigaction sa;
memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
sa.sa_sigaction = handler;
sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | flags;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
if (sigaction(sig, &sa, 0))
err(1, "sigaction");
}
static void clearhandler(int sig)
{
struct sigaction sa;
memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
if (sigaction(sig, &sa, 0))
err(1, "sigaction");
}
static sig_atomic_t got_signal;
static void sighandler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx_void)
{
ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t*)ctx_void;
if (ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EFL] & X86_EFLAGS_VM ||
(ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_CS] & 3) != 3) {
printf("[FAIL]\tSignal frame should not reflect vm86 mode\n");
nerrs++;
}
const char *signame;
if (sig == SIGSEGV)
signame = "SIGSEGV";
else if (sig == SIGILL)
signame = "SIGILL";
else
signame = "unexpected signal";
printf("[INFO]\t%s: FLAGS = 0x%lx, CS = 0x%hx\n", signame,
(unsigned long)ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EFL],
(unsigned short)ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_CS]);
got_signal = 1;
}
asm (
".pushsection .rodata\n\t"
".type vmcode_bound, @object\n\t"
"vmcode:\n\t"
"vmcode_bound:\n\t"
".code16\n\t"
"bound %ax, (2048)\n\t"
"int3\n\t"
"vmcode_sysenter:\n\t"
"sysenter\n\t"
"vmcode_syscall:\n\t"
"syscall\n\t"
"vmcode_sti:\n\t"
"sti\n\t"
"vmcode_int3:\n\t"
"int3\n\t"
"vmcode_int80:\n\t"
"int $0x80\n\t"
"vmcode_popf_hlt:\n\t"
"push %ax\n\t"
"popf\n\t"
"hlt\n\t"
selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Certain user space programs that run on virtual-8086 mode may utilize instructions protected by the User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature present in new Intel processors: SGDT, SIDT and SMSW. In such a case, a general protection fault is issued if UMIP is enabled. When such a fault happens, the kernel traps it and emulates the results of these instructions with dummy values. The purpose of this new test is to verify whether the impacted instructions can be executed without causing such #GP. If no #GP exceptions occur, we expect to exit virtual-8086 mode from INT3. The instructions protected by UMIP are executed in representative use cases: a) displacement-only memory addressing b) register-indirect memory addressing c) results stored directly in operands Unfortunately, it is not possible to check the results against a set of expected values because no emulation will occur in systems that do not have the UMIP feature. Instead, results are printed for verification. A simple verification is done to ensure that results of all tests are identical. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-12-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 09:27:56 +07:00
"vmcode_umip:\n\t"
/* addressing via displacements */
"smsw (2052)\n\t"
"sidt (2054)\n\t"
"sgdt (2060)\n\t"
/* addressing via registers */
"mov $2066, %bx\n\t"
"smsw (%bx)\n\t"
"mov $2068, %bx\n\t"
"sidt (%bx)\n\t"
"mov $2074, %bx\n\t"
"sgdt (%bx)\n\t"
/* register operands, only for smsw */
"smsw %ax\n\t"
"mov %ax, (2080)\n\t"
"int3\n\t"
selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT instructions The STR and SLDT instructions are not valid when running on virtual-8086 mode and generate an invalid operand exception. These two instructions are protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature. In protected mode, if UMIP is enabled, these instructions generate a general protection fault if called from CPL > 0. Linux traps the general protection fault and emulates the instructions sgdt, sidt and smsw; but not str and sldt. These tests are added to verify that the emulation code does not emulate these two instructions but the expected invalid operand exception is seen. Tests fallback to exit with INT3 in case emulation does happen. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 09:27:57 +07:00
"vmcode_umip_str:\n\t"
"str %eax\n\t"
"vmcode_umip_sldt:\n\t"
"sldt %eax\n\t"
"int3\n\t"
".size vmcode, . - vmcode\n\t"
"end_vmcode:\n\t"
".code32\n\t"
".popsection"
);
extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_popf_hlt[],
vmcode_umip[], vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
/* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
unsigned int rettype, unsigned int retarg,
const char *text)
{
long ret;
printf("[RUN]\t%s from vm86 mode\n", text);
v86->regs.eip = eip;
ret = vm86(VM86_ENTER, v86);
if (ret == -1 && (errno == ENOSYS || errno == EPERM)) {
printf("[SKIP]\tvm86 %s\n",
errno == ENOSYS ? "not supported" : "not allowed");
return false;
}
if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_INTx) {
char trapname[32];
int trapno = VM86_ARG(ret);
if (trapno == 13)
strcpy(trapname, "GP");
else if (trapno == 5)
strcpy(trapname, "BR");
else if (trapno == 14)
strcpy(trapname, "PF");
else
sprintf(trapname, "%d", trapno);
printf("[INFO]\tExited vm86 mode due to #%s\n", trapname);
} else if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_UNKNOWN) {
printf("[INFO]\tExited vm86 mode due to unhandled GP fault\n");
} else if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_TRAP) {
printf("[INFO]\tExited vm86 mode due to a trap (arg=%ld)\n",
VM86_ARG(ret));
} else if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_SIGNAL) {
printf("[INFO]\tExited vm86 mode due to a signal\n");
} else if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_STI) {
printf("[INFO]\tExited vm86 mode due to STI\n");
} else {
printf("[INFO]\tExited vm86 mode due to type %ld, arg %ld\n",
VM86_TYPE(ret), VM86_ARG(ret));
}
if (rettype == -1 ||
(VM86_TYPE(ret) == rettype && VM86_ARG(ret) == retarg)) {
printf("[OK]\tReturned correctly\n");
} else {
printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason (started at eip = 0x%lx, ended at eip = 0x%lx)\n", eip, v86->regs.eip);
nerrs++;
}
return true;
}
selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Certain user space programs that run on virtual-8086 mode may utilize instructions protected by the User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature present in new Intel processors: SGDT, SIDT and SMSW. In such a case, a general protection fault is issued if UMIP is enabled. When such a fault happens, the kernel traps it and emulates the results of these instructions with dummy values. The purpose of this new test is to verify whether the impacted instructions can be executed without causing such #GP. If no #GP exceptions occur, we expect to exit virtual-8086 mode from INT3. The instructions protected by UMIP are executed in representative use cases: a) displacement-only memory addressing b) register-indirect memory addressing c) results stored directly in operands Unfortunately, it is not possible to check the results against a set of expected values because no emulation will occur in systems that do not have the UMIP feature. Instead, results are printed for verification. A simple verification is done to ensure that results of all tests are identical. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-12-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 09:27:56 +07:00
void do_umip_tests(struct vm86plus_struct *vm86, unsigned char *test_mem)
{
struct table_desc {
unsigned short limit;
unsigned long base;
} __attribute__((packed));
/* Initialize variables with arbitrary values */
struct table_desc gdt1 = { .base = 0x3c3c3c3c, .limit = 0x9999 };
struct table_desc gdt2 = { .base = 0x1a1a1a1a, .limit = 0xaeae };
struct table_desc idt1 = { .base = 0x7b7b7b7b, .limit = 0xf1f1 };
struct table_desc idt2 = { .base = 0x89898989, .limit = 0x1313 };
unsigned short msw1 = 0x1414, msw2 = 0x2525, msw3 = 3737;
/* UMIP -- exit with INT3 unless kernel emulation did not trap #GP */
do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip - vmcode, VM86_TRAP, 3, "UMIP tests");
/* Results from displacement-only addressing */
msw1 = *(unsigned short *)(test_mem + 2052);
memcpy(&idt1, test_mem + 2054, sizeof(idt1));
memcpy(&gdt1, test_mem + 2060, sizeof(gdt1));
/* Results from register-indirect addressing */
msw2 = *(unsigned short *)(test_mem + 2066);
memcpy(&idt2, test_mem + 2068, sizeof(idt2));
memcpy(&gdt2, test_mem + 2074, sizeof(gdt2));
/* Results when using register operands */
msw3 = *(unsigned short *)(test_mem + 2080);
printf("[INFO]\tResult from SMSW:[0x%04x]\n", msw1);
printf("[INFO]\tResult from SIDT: limit[0x%04x]base[0x%08lx]\n",
idt1.limit, idt1.base);
printf("[INFO]\tResult from SGDT: limit[0x%04x]base[0x%08lx]\n",
gdt1.limit, gdt1.base);
if (msw1 != msw2 || msw1 != msw3)
printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SMSW should be the same.\n");
else
printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SMSW are identical.\n");
if (memcmp(&gdt1, &gdt2, sizeof(gdt1)))
printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SGDT should be the same.\n");
else
printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SGDT are identical.\n");
if (memcmp(&idt1, &idt2, sizeof(idt1)))
printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SIDT should be the same.\n");
else
printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SIDT are identical.\n");
selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT instructions The STR and SLDT instructions are not valid when running on virtual-8086 mode and generate an invalid operand exception. These two instructions are protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature. In protected mode, if UMIP is enabled, these instructions generate a general protection fault if called from CPL > 0. Linux traps the general protection fault and emulates the instructions sgdt, sidt and smsw; but not str and sldt. These tests are added to verify that the emulation code does not emulate these two instructions but the expected invalid operand exception is seen. Tests fallback to exit with INT3 in case emulation does happen. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 09:27:57 +07:00
sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_str - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
"STR instruction");
clearhandler(SIGILL);
sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_sldt - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
"SLDT instruction");
clearhandler(SIGILL);
selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Certain user space programs that run on virtual-8086 mode may utilize instructions protected by the User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature present in new Intel processors: SGDT, SIDT and SMSW. In such a case, a general protection fault is issued if UMIP is enabled. When such a fault happens, the kernel traps it and emulates the results of these instructions with dummy values. The purpose of this new test is to verify whether the impacted instructions can be executed without causing such #GP. If no #GP exceptions occur, we expect to exit virtual-8086 mode from INT3. The instructions protected by UMIP are executed in representative use cases: a) displacement-only memory addressing b) register-indirect memory addressing c) results stored directly in operands Unfortunately, it is not possible to check the results against a set of expected values because no emulation will occur in systems that do not have the UMIP feature. Instead, results are printed for verification. A simple verification is done to ensure that results of all tests are identical. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-12-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 09:27:56 +07:00
}
int main(void)
{
struct vm86plus_struct v86;
unsigned char *addr = mmap((void *)load_addr, 4096,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1,0);
if (addr != (unsigned char *)load_addr)
err(1, "mmap");
memcpy(addr, vmcode, end_vmcode - vmcode);
addr[2048] = 2;
addr[2050] = 3;
memset(&v86, 0, sizeof(v86));
v86.regs.cs = load_addr / 16;
v86.regs.ss = load_addr / 16;
v86.regs.ds = load_addr / 16;
v86.regs.es = load_addr / 16;
/* Use the end of the page as our stack. */
v86.regs.esp = 4096;
assert((v86.regs.cs & 3) == 0); /* Looks like RPL = 0 */
/* #BR -- should deliver SIG??? */
do_test(&v86, vmcode_bound - vmcode, VM86_INTx, 5, "#BR");
/*
* SYSENTER -- should cause #GP or #UD depending on CPU.
* Expected return type -1 means that we shouldn't validate
* the vm86 return value. This will avoid problems on non-SEP
* CPUs.
*/
sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
do_test(&v86, vmcode_sysenter - vmcode, -1, 0, "SYSENTER");
clearhandler(SIGILL);
/*
* SYSCALL would be a disaster in VM86 mode. Fortunately,
* there is no kernel that both enables SYSCALL and sets
* EFER.SCE, so it's #UD on all systems. But vm86 is
* buggy (or has a "feature"), so the SIGILL will actually
* be delivered.
*/
sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
do_test(&v86, vmcode_syscall - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0, "SYSCALL");
clearhandler(SIGILL);
/* STI with VIP set */
v86.regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
v86.regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IF;
do_test(&v86, vmcode_sti - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "STI with VIP set");
/* POPF with VIP set but IF clear: should not trap */
v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
v86.regs.eax = 0;
do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP set and IF clear");
/* POPF with VIP set and IF set: should trap */
v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF;
do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "POPF with VIP and IF set");
/* POPF with VIP clear and IF set: should not trap */
v86.regs.eflags = 0;
v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF;
do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP clear and IF set");
v86.regs.eflags = 0;
/* INT3 -- should cause #BP */
do_test(&v86, vmcode_int3 - vmcode, VM86_TRAP, 3, "INT3");
/* INT80 -- should exit with "INTx 0x80" */
v86.regs.eax = (unsigned int)-1;
do_test(&v86, vmcode_int80 - vmcode, VM86_INTx, 0x80, "int80");
selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Certain user space programs that run on virtual-8086 mode may utilize instructions protected by the User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature present in new Intel processors: SGDT, SIDT and SMSW. In such a case, a general protection fault is issued if UMIP is enabled. When such a fault happens, the kernel traps it and emulates the results of these instructions with dummy values. The purpose of this new test is to verify whether the impacted instructions can be executed without causing such #GP. If no #GP exceptions occur, we expect to exit virtual-8086 mode from INT3. The instructions protected by UMIP are executed in representative use cases: a) displacement-only memory addressing b) register-indirect memory addressing c) results stored directly in operands Unfortunately, it is not possible to check the results against a set of expected values because no emulation will occur in systems that do not have the UMIP feature. Instead, results are printed for verification. A simple verification is done to ensure that results of all tests are identical. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-12-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 09:27:56 +07:00
/* UMIP -- should exit with INTx 0x80 unless UMIP was not disabled */
do_umip_tests(&v86, addr);
/* Execute a null pointer */
v86.regs.cs = 0;
v86.regs.ss = 0;
sethandler(SIGSEGV, sighandler, 0);
got_signal = 0;
if (do_test(&v86, 0, VM86_SIGNAL, 0, "Execute null pointer") &&
!got_signal) {
printf("[FAIL]\tDid not receive SIGSEGV\n");
nerrs++;
}
clearhandler(SIGSEGV);
/* Make sure nothing explodes if we fork. */
if (fork() == 0)
return 0;
return (nerrs == 0 ? 0 : 1);
}