License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 21:07:57 +07:00
|
|
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
2005-09-23 02:20:04 +07:00
|
|
|
#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_ATOMIC_H_
|
|
|
|
#define _ASM_POWERPC_ATOMIC_H_
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PowerPC atomic operations
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __KERNEL__
|
2012-03-29 00:30:02 +07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
|
2014-03-14 01:00:35 +07:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/barrier.h>
|
2018-07-05 23:24:55 +07:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/asm-405.h>
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-23 02:20:04 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Since *_return_relaxed and {cmp}xchg_relaxed are implemented with
|
|
|
|
* a "bne-" instruction at the end, so an isync is enough as a acquire barrier
|
|
|
|
* on the platform without lwsync.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-07-16 18:30:11 +07:00
|
|
|
#define __atomic_acquire_fence() \
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define __atomic_release_fence() \
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory")
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-08-11 07:15:30 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__("lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m"(v->counter));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__("stw%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m"(v->counter) : "r"(i));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic_##op(int a, atomic_t *v) \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
int t; \
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%3 # atomic_" #op "\n" \
|
|
|
|
#asm_op " %0,%2,%0\n" \
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0,%3) \
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%3 \n" \
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b\n" \
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "r" (a), "r" (&v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "cc"); \
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC_OP_RETURN_RELAXED(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
static inline int atomic_##op##_return_relaxed(int a, atomic_t *v) \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
int t; \
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%3 # atomic_" #op "_return_relaxed\n" \
|
|
|
|
#asm_op " %0,%2,%0\n" \
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0, %3) \
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%3\n" \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
" bne- 1b\n" \
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter) \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (a), "r" (&v->counter) \
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc"); \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
return t; \
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_RELAXED(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
static inline int atomic_fetch_##op##_relaxed(int a, atomic_t *v) \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
int res, t; \
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%4 # atomic_fetch_" #op "_relaxed\n" \
|
|
|
|
#asm_op " %1,%3,%0\n" \
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0, %4) \
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %1,0,%4\n" \
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b\n" \
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (res), "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "r" (a), "r" (&v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "cc"); \
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
return res; \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op) \
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OP_RETURN_RELAXED(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_RELAXED(op, asm_op)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OPS(add, add)
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OPS(sub, subf)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_add_return_relaxed atomic_add_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_sub_return_relaxed atomic_sub_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_fetch_add_relaxed atomic_fetch_add_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC_OPS
|
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_RELAXED(op, asm_op)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OPS(and, and)
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OPS(or, or)
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC_OPS(xor, xor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_fetch_and_relaxed atomic_fetch_and_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_fetch_or_relaxed atomic_fetch_or_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC_OPS
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_RELAXED
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC_OP_RETURN_RELAXED
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC_OP
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 # atomic_inc\n\
|
|
|
|
addic %0,%0,1\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%2 \n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b"
|
2006-07-09 05:00:28 +07:00
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
2008-11-06 01:39:27 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:19 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_inc atomic_inc
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic_inc_return_relaxed(atomic_t *v)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 # atomic_inc_return_relaxed\n"
|
|
|
|
" addic %0,%0,1\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0, %2)
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%2\n"
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 # atomic_dec\n\
|
|
|
|
addic %0,%0,-1\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)\
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%2\n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b"
|
2006-07-09 05:00:28 +07:00
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
2008-11-06 01:39:27 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:19 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_dec atomic_dec
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic_dec_return_relaxed(atomic_t *v)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 # atomic_dec_return_relaxed\n"
|
|
|
|
" addic %0,%0,-1\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0, %2)
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%2\n"
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_inc_return_relaxed atomic_inc_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_dec_return_relaxed atomic_dec_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-08 14:34:27 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_cmpxchg(v, o, n) (cmpxchg(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)))
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement acquire/release/relaxed variants for cmpxchg
Implement cmpxchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_relaxed, based on
which _release variants can be built.
To avoid superfluous barriers in _acquire variants, we implement these
operations with assembly code rather use __atomic_op_acquire() to build
them automatically.
For the same reason, we keep the assembly implementation of fully
ordered cmpxchg operations.
However, we don't do the similar for _release, because that will require
putting barriers in the middle of ll/sc loops, which is probably a bad
idea.
Note cmpxchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_relaxed are not
compiler barriers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-12-15 21:24:17 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(v, o, n) \
|
|
|
|
cmpxchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (o), (n))
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(v, o, n) \
|
|
|
|
cmpxchg_acquire(&((v)->counter), (o), (n))
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-10 06:59:17 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new))
|
2015-12-15 21:24:16 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_xchg_relaxed(v, new) xchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (new))
|
2005-11-14 07:07:24 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-14 07:07:25 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
atomics/treewide: Rename __atomic_add_unless() => atomic_fetch_add_unless()
While __atomic_add_unless() was originally intended as a building-block
for atomic_add_unless(), it's now used in a number of places around the
kernel. It's the only common atomic operation named __atomic*(), rather
than atomic_*(), and for consistency it would be better named
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This lack of consistency is slightly confusing, and gets in the way of
scripting atomics. Given that, let's clean things up and promote it to
an official part of the atomics API, in the form of
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This patch converts definitions and invocations over to the new name,
including the instrumented version, using the following script:
----
git grep -w __atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__atomic_add_unless\>/atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
git grep -w __arch_atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__arch_atomic_add_unless\>/arch_atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
----
Note that we do not have atomic{64,_long}_fetch_add_unless(), which will
be introduced by later patches.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-06-21 19:13:04 +07:00
|
|
|
* atomic_fetch_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
|
2005-11-14 07:07:25 +07:00
|
|
|
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
|
|
|
|
* @a: the amount to add to v...
|
|
|
|
* @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
|
2011-07-27 06:09:07 +07:00
|
|
|
* Returns the old value of @v.
|
2005-11-14 07:07:25 +07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
atomics/treewide: Rename __atomic_add_unless() => atomic_fetch_add_unless()
While __atomic_add_unless() was originally intended as a building-block
for atomic_add_unless(), it's now used in a number of places around the
kernel. It's the only common atomic operation named __atomic*(), rather
than atomic_*(), and for consistency it would be better named
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This lack of consistency is slightly confusing, and gets in the way of
scripting atomics. Given that, let's clean things up and promote it to
an official part of the atomics API, in the form of
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This patch converts definitions and invocations over to the new name,
including the instrumented version, using the following script:
----
git grep -w __atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__atomic_add_unless\>/atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
git grep -w __arch_atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__arch_atomic_add_unless\>/arch_atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
----
Note that we do not have atomic{64,_long}_fetch_add_unless(), which will
be introduced by later patches.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-06-21 19:13:04 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic_fetch_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
|
2006-02-20 16:41:40 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__ (
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
|
atomics/treewide: Rename __atomic_add_unless() => atomic_fetch_add_unless()
While __atomic_add_unless() was originally intended as a building-block
for atomic_add_unless(), it's now used in a number of places around the
kernel. It's the only common atomic operation named __atomic*(), rather
than atomic_*(), and for consistency it would be better named
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This lack of consistency is slightly confusing, and gets in the way of
scripting atomics. Given that, let's clean things up and promote it to
an official part of the atomics API, in the form of
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This patch converts definitions and invocations over to the new name,
including the instrumented version, using the following script:
----
git grep -w __atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__atomic_add_unless\>/atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
git grep -w __arch_atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__arch_atomic_add_unless\>/arch_atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
----
Note that we do not have atomic{64,_long}_fetch_add_unless(), which will
be introduced by later patches.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-06-21 19:13:04 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%1 # atomic_fetch_add_unless\n\
|
2006-02-20 16:41:40 +07:00
|
|
|
cmpw 0,%0,%3 \n\
|
2016-10-03 13:03:03 +07:00
|
|
|
beq 2f \n\
|
2006-02-20 16:41:40 +07:00
|
|
|
add %0,%2,%0 \n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%1 \n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b \n"
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
|
2006-02-20 16:41:40 +07:00
|
|
|
" subf %0,%2,%0 \n\
|
|
|
|
2:"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (a), "r" (u)
|
|
|
|
: "cc", "memory");
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-27 06:09:07 +07:00
|
|
|
return t;
|
2006-02-20 16:41:40 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:09 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_fetch_add_unless atomic_fetch_add_unless
|
2006-02-20 16:41:40 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-01 04:12:16 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* atomic_inc_not_zero - increment unless the number is zero
|
|
|
|
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Atomically increments @v by 1, so long as @v is non-zero.
|
|
|
|
* Returns non-zero if @v was non-zero, and zero otherwise.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic_inc_not_zero(atomic_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t1, t2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__ (
|
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
|
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 # atomic_inc_not_zero\n\
|
|
|
|
cmpwi 0,%0,0\n\
|
|
|
|
beq- 2f\n\
|
|
|
|
addic %1,%0,1\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %1,0,%2\n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
|
|
|
|
"\n\
|
|
|
|
2:"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t1), "=&r" (t2)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer", "memory");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#define atomic_inc_not_zero(v) atomic_inc_not_zero((v))
|
2005-11-14 07:07:25 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Atomically test *v and decrement if it is greater than 0.
|
2007-01-17 23:50:20 +07:00
|
|
|
* The function returns the old value of *v minus 1, even if
|
|
|
|
* the atomic variable, v, was not decremented.
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic_dec_if_positive(atomic_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: lwarx %0,0,%1 # atomic_dec_if_positive\n\
|
2007-01-17 23:50:20 +07:00
|
|
|
cmpwi %0,1\n\
|
|
|
|
addi %0,%0,-1\n\
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
blt- 2f\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC405_ERR77(0,%1)
|
|
|
|
" stwcx. %0,0,%1\n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b"
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
"\n\
|
2007-01-17 23:50:20 +07:00
|
|
|
2:" : "=&b" (t)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "cc", "memory");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-10-09 06:32:18 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic_dec_if_positive atomic_dec_if_positive
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
#ifdef __powerpc64__
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ s64 atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
|
2007-08-11 07:15:30 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2007-08-11 07:15:30 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m"(v->counter));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
|
2007-08-11 07:15:30 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m"(v->counter) : "r"(i));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op) \
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic64_##op(s64 a, atomic64_t *v) \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
{ \
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t; \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%3 # atomic64_" #op "\n" \
|
|
|
|
#asm_op " %0,%2,%0\n" \
|
|
|
|
" stdcx. %0,0,%3 \n" \
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b\n" \
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "r" (a), "r" (&v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "cc"); \
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN_RELAXED(op, asm_op) \
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static inline s64 \
|
|
|
|
atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(s64 a, atomic64_t *v) \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
{ \
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t; \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%3 # atomic64_" #op "_return_relaxed\n" \
|
|
|
|
#asm_op " %0,%2,%0\n" \
|
|
|
|
" stdcx. %0,0,%3\n" \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
" bne- 1b\n" \
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter) \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (a), "r" (&v->counter) \
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc"); \
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
return t; \
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_RELAXED(op, asm_op) \
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static inline s64 \
|
|
|
|
atomic64_fetch_##op##_relaxed(s64 a, atomic64_t *v) \
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
{ \
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 res, t; \
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%4 # atomic64_fetch_" #op "_relaxed\n" \
|
|
|
|
#asm_op " %1,%3,%0\n" \
|
|
|
|
" stdcx. %1,0,%4\n" \
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b\n" \
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (res), "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "r" (a), "r" (&v->counter) \
|
|
|
|
: "cc"); \
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
return res; \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC64_OPS(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op) \
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN_RELAXED(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_RELAXED(op, asm_op)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OPS(add, add)
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OPS(sub, subf)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_add_return_relaxed atomic64_add_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_sub_return_relaxed atomic64_sub_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_fetch_add_relaxed atomic64_fetch_add_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_fetch_sub_relaxed atomic64_fetch_sub_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC64_OPS
|
|
|
|
#define ATOMIC64_OPS(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op) \
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_RELAXED(op, asm_op)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OPS(and, and)
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OPS(or, or)
|
|
|
|
ATOMIC64_OPS(xor, xor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_fetch_and_relaxed atomic64_fetch_and_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_fetch_or_relaxed atomic64_fetch_or_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_fetch_xor_relaxed atomic64_fetch_xor_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOPIC64_OPS
|
locking/atomic, arch/powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()
Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-18 06:16:05 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_RELAXED
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN_RELAXED
|
2014-03-27 00:11:31 +07:00
|
|
|
#undef ATOMIC64_OP
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 # atomic64_inc\n\
|
|
|
|
addic %0,%0,1\n\
|
|
|
|
stdcx. %0,0,%2 \n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b"
|
2006-07-09 05:00:28 +07:00
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
2008-11-06 01:39:27 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:19 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_inc atomic64_inc
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ s64 atomic64_inc_return_relaxed(atomic64_t *v)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 # atomic64_inc_return_relaxed\n"
|
|
|
|
" addic %0,%0,1\n"
|
|
|
|
" stdcx. %0,0,%2\n"
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __inline__ void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 # atomic64_dec\n\
|
|
|
|
addic %0,%0,-1\n\
|
|
|
|
stdcx. %0,0,%2\n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b"
|
2006-07-09 05:00:28 +07:00
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
2008-11-06 01:39:27 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:19 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_dec atomic64_dec
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ s64 atomic64_dec_return_relaxed(atomic64_t *v)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 # atomic64_dec_return_relaxed\n"
|
|
|
|
" addic %0,%0,-1\n"
|
|
|
|
" stdcx. %0,0,%2\n"
|
|
|
|
" bne- 1b"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t), "+m" (v->counter)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer");
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{, 64}_*_return_* variants
On powerpc, acquire and release semantics can be achieved with
lightweight barriers("lwsync" and "ctrl+isync"), which can be used to
implement __atomic_op_{acquire,release}.
For release semantics, since we only need to ensure all memory accesses
that issue before must take effects before the -store- part of the
atomics, "lwsync" is what we only need. On the platform without
"lwsync", "sync" should be used. Therefore in __atomic_op_release() we
use PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER.
For acquire semantics, "lwsync" is what we only need for the similar
reason. However on the platform without "lwsync", we can use "isync"
rather than "sync" as an acquire barrier. Therefore in
__atomic_op_acquire() we use PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, which is barrier() on
UP, "lwsync" if available and "isync" otherwise.
Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_relaxed, and build other
variants with these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-01-06 09:08:25 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_inc_return_relaxed atomic64_inc_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_dec_return_relaxed atomic64_dec_return_relaxed
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Atomically test *v and decrement if it is greater than 0.
|
|
|
|
* The function returns the old value of *v minus 1.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ s64 atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%1 # atomic64_dec_if_positive\n\
|
|
|
|
addic. %0,%0,-1\n\
|
|
|
|
blt- 2f\n\
|
|
|
|
stdcx. %0,0,%1\n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b"
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
"\n\
|
|
|
|
2:" : "=&r" (t)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
2008-11-06 01:39:27 +07:00
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer", "memory");
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:20 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_dec_if_positive atomic64_dec_if_positive
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-08 14:34:27 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_cmpxchg(v, o, n) (cmpxchg(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)))
|
powerpc: atomic: Implement acquire/release/relaxed variants for cmpxchg
Implement cmpxchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_relaxed, based on
which _release variants can be built.
To avoid superfluous barriers in _acquire variants, we implement these
operations with assembly code rather use __atomic_op_acquire() to build
them automatically.
For the same reason, we keep the assembly implementation of fully
ordered cmpxchg operations.
However, we don't do the similar for _release, because that will require
putting barriers in the middle of ll/sc loops, which is probably a bad
idea.
Note cmpxchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_relaxed are not
compiler barriers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-12-15 21:24:17 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(v, o, n) \
|
|
|
|
cmpxchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (o), (n))
|
|
|
|
#define atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(v, o, n) \
|
|
|
|
cmpxchg_acquire(&((v)->counter), (o), (n))
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new))
|
2015-12-15 21:24:16 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_xchg_relaxed(v, new) xchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (new))
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
2018-06-21 19:13:15 +07:00
|
|
|
* atomic64_fetch_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
* @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
|
|
|
|
* @a: the amount to add to v...
|
|
|
|
* @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
|
2011-07-27 06:09:07 +07:00
|
|
|
* Returns the old value of @v.
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ s64 atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, s64 a, s64 u)
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t;
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__ (
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
|
2018-06-21 19:13:15 +07:00
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%1 # atomic64_fetch_add_unless\n\
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
cmpd 0,%0,%3 \n\
|
2016-10-03 13:03:03 +07:00
|
|
|
beq 2f \n\
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
add %0,%2,%0 \n"
|
|
|
|
" stdcx. %0,0,%1 \n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b \n"
|
2011-11-16 00:11:27 +07:00
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
" subf %0,%2,%0 \n\
|
|
|
|
2:"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (a), "r" (u)
|
|
|
|
: "cc", "memory");
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 19:13:15 +07:00
|
|
|
return t;
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:15 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_fetch_add_unless atomic64_fetch_add_unless
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-01 04:12:16 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* atomic_inc64_not_zero - increment unless the number is zero
|
|
|
|
* @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Atomically increments @v by 1, so long as @v is non-zero.
|
|
|
|
* Returns non-zero if @v was non-zero, and zero otherwise.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-07-11 19:10:54 +07:00
|
|
|
static __inline__ int atomic64_inc_not_zero(atomic64_t *v)
|
2012-03-01 04:12:16 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-22 20:22:42 +07:00
|
|
|
s64 t1, t2;
|
2012-03-01 04:12:16 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__ (
|
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
|
|
|
|
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 # atomic64_inc_not_zero\n\
|
|
|
|
cmpdi 0,%0,0\n\
|
|
|
|
beq- 2f\n\
|
|
|
|
addic %1,%0,1\n\
|
|
|
|
stdcx. %1,0,%2\n\
|
|
|
|
bne- 1b\n"
|
|
|
|
PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
|
|
|
|
"\n\
|
|
|
|
2:"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (t1), "=&r" (t2)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
|
|
|
: "cc", "xer", "memory");
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 19:10:54 +07:00
|
|
|
return t1 != 0;
|
2012-03-01 04:12:16 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-06-21 19:13:08 +07:00
|
|
|
#define atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) atomic64_inc_not_zero((v))
|
2007-01-25 23:15:52 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-10 11:51:14 +07:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
|
2005-09-23 02:20:04 +07:00
|
|
|
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_ATOMIC_H_ */
|