linux_dsm_epyc7002/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c

133 lines
3.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 21:07:57 +07:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* ACPI 5.1 based NUMA setup for ARM64
* Lots of code was borrowed from arch/x86/mm/srat.c
*
* Copyright 2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
* Copyright (C) 2013-2016, Linaro Ltd.
* Author: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
*
* Reads the ACPI SRAT table to figure out what memory belongs to which CPUs.
*
* Called from acpi_numa_init while reading the SRAT and SLIT tables.
* Assumes all memory regions belonging to a single proximity domain
* are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: NUMA: " fmt
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/mmzone.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/topology.h>
#include <asm/numa.h>
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
{
return acpi_early_node_map[cpu];
}
static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid)
{
int cpu;
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu))
return cpu;
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
return -EINVAL;
}
static int __init acpi_parse_gicc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
const unsigned long end)
{
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa;
int cpu, pxm, node;
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
if (srat_disabled())
return -EINVAL;
pa = (struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *)header;
if (!pa)
return -EINVAL;
if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED))
return 0;
arm64: numa: rework ACPI NUMA initialization Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca8c23 ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-06-25 20:05:52 +07:00
pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
/*
* If we can't map the UID to a logical cpu this
* means that the UID is not part of possible cpus
* so we do not need a NUMA mapping for it, skip
* the SRAT entry and keep parsing.
*/
cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(pa->acpi_processor_uid);
if (cpu < 0)
return 0;
acpi_early_node_map[cpu] = node;
pr_info("SRAT: PXM %d -> MPIDR 0x%llx -> Node %d\n", pxm,
cpu_logical_map(cpu), node);
return 0;
}
void __init acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void)
{
acpi_table_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_gicc_pxm, 0);
}
/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> ACPI processor UID mapping */
void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
{
int pxm, node;
if (srat_disabled())
return;
if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity)) {
pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n",
pa->header.length);
bad_srat();
return;
}
if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED))
return;
pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
bad_srat();
return;
}
node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
}
int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
{
int ret;
ret = acpi_numa_init();
if (ret) {
pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
return ret;
}
return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
}