2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
/* U1memcpy.S: UltraSPARC-I/II/IIi/IIe optimized memcpy.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 1997, 2004 David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Jakub Jelinek (jj@ultra.linux.cz)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __KERNEL__
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/visasm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/asi.h>
|
|
|
|
#define GLOBAL_SPARE g7
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define GLOBAL_SPARE g5
|
|
|
|
#define ASI_BLK_P 0xf0
|
|
|
|
#define FPRS_FEF 0x04
|
|
|
|
#ifdef MEMCPY_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
#define VISEntry rd %fprs, %o5; wr %g0, FPRS_FEF, %fprs; \
|
|
|
|
clr %g1; clr %g2; clr %g3; subcc %g0, %g0, %g0;
|
|
|
|
#define VISExit and %o5, FPRS_FEF, %o5; wr %o5, 0x0, %fprs
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define VISEntry rd %fprs, %o5; wr %g0, FPRS_FEF, %fprs
|
|
|
|
#define VISExit and %o5, FPRS_FEF, %o5; wr %o5, 0x0, %fprs
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef EX_LD
|
|
|
|
#define EX_LD(x) x
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
#ifndef EX_LD_FP
|
|
|
|
#define EX_LD_FP(x) x
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef EX_ST
|
|
|
|
#define EX_ST(x) x
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
#ifndef EX_ST_FP
|
|
|
|
#define EX_ST_FP(x) x
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef EX_RETVAL
|
|
|
|
#define EX_RETVAL(x) x
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef LOAD
|
|
|
|
#define LOAD(type,addr,dest) type [addr], dest
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef LOAD_BLK
|
|
|
|
#define LOAD_BLK(addr,dest) ldda [addr] ASI_BLK_P, dest
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef STORE
|
|
|
|
#define STORE(type,src,addr) type src, [addr]
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef STORE_BLK
|
|
|
|
#define STORE_BLK(src,addr) stda src, [addr] ASI_BLK_P
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef FUNC_NAME
|
|
|
|
#define FUNC_NAME memcpy
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef PREAMBLE
|
|
|
|
#define PREAMBLE
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef XCC
|
|
|
|
#define XCC xcc
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define FREG_FROB(f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8, f9) \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f1, %f2, %f48; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f2, %f3, %f50; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f3, %f4, %f52; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f4, %f5, %f54; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f5, %f6, %f56; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f6, %f7, %f58; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f7, %f8, %f60; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f8, %f9, %f62;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define MAIN_LOOP_CHUNK(src, dest, fdest, fsrc, len, jmptgt) \
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD_BLK(%src, %fdest)); \
|
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE_BLK(%fsrc, %dest)); \
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %src, 0x40, %src; \
|
|
|
|
subcc %len, 0x40, %len; \
|
|
|
|
be,pn %xcc, jmptgt; \
|
|
|
|
add %dest, 0x40, %dest; \
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define LOOP_CHUNK1(src, dest, len, branch_dest) \
|
|
|
|
MAIN_LOOP_CHUNK(src, dest, f0, f48, len, branch_dest)
|
|
|
|
#define LOOP_CHUNK2(src, dest, len, branch_dest) \
|
|
|
|
MAIN_LOOP_CHUNK(src, dest, f16, f48, len, branch_dest)
|
|
|
|
#define LOOP_CHUNK3(src, dest, len, branch_dest) \
|
|
|
|
MAIN_LOOP_CHUNK(src, dest, f32, f48, len, branch_dest)
|
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
#define DO_SYNC membar #Sync;
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
#define STORE_SYNC(dest, fsrc) \
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE_BLK(%fsrc, %dest)); \
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
add %dest, 0x40, %dest; \
|
|
|
|
DO_SYNC
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define STORE_JUMP(dest, fsrc, target) \
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE_BLK(%fsrc, %dest)); \
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %dest, 0x40, %dest; \
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, target; \
|
|
|
|
nop;
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define FINISH_VISCHUNK(dest, f0, f1, left) \
|
|
|
|
subcc %left, 8, %left;\
|
|
|
|
bl,pn %xcc, 95f; \
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f0, %f1, %f48; \
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(std, %f48, %dest)); \
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %dest, 8, %dest;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define UNEVEN_VISCHUNK_LAST(dest, f0, f1, left) \
|
|
|
|
subcc %left, 8, %left; \
|
|
|
|
bl,pn %xcc, 95f; \
|
2012-06-27 15:25:23 +07:00
|
|
|
fsrc2 %f0, %f1;
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define UNEVEN_VISCHUNK(dest, f0, f1, left) \
|
|
|
|
UNEVEN_VISCHUNK_LAST(dest, f0, f1, left) \
|
|
|
|
ba,a,pt %xcc, 93f;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.register %g2,#scratch
|
|
|
|
.register %g3,#scratch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.text
|
|
|
|
.align 64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.globl FUNC_NAME
|
|
|
|
.type FUNC_NAME,#function
|
|
|
|
FUNC_NAME: /* %o0=dst, %o1=src, %o2=len */
|
|
|
|
srlx %o2, 31, %g2
|
|
|
|
cmp %g2, 0
|
|
|
|
tne %xcc, 5
|
|
|
|
PREAMBLE
|
|
|
|
mov %o0, %o4
|
|
|
|
cmp %o2, 0
|
|
|
|
be,pn %XCC, 85f
|
|
|
|
or %o0, %o1, %o3
|
|
|
|
cmp %o2, 16
|
|
|
|
blu,a,pn %XCC, 80f
|
|
|
|
or %o3, %o2, %o3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmp %o2, (5 * 64)
|
|
|
|
blu,pt %XCC, 70f
|
|
|
|
andcc %o3, 0x7, %g0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Clobbers o5/g1/g2/g3/g7/icc/xcc. */
|
|
|
|
VISEntry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Is 'dst' already aligned on an 64-byte boundary? */
|
|
|
|
andcc %o0, 0x3f, %g2
|
|
|
|
be,pt %XCC, 2f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Compute abs((dst & 0x3f) - 0x40) into %g2. This is the number
|
|
|
|
* of bytes to copy to make 'dst' 64-byte aligned. We pre-
|
|
|
|
* subtract this from 'len'.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
sub %o0, %o1, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
sub %g2, 0x40, %g2
|
|
|
|
sub %g0, %g2, %g2
|
|
|
|
sub %o2, %g2, %o2
|
|
|
|
andcc %g2, 0x7, %g1
|
|
|
|
be,pt %icc, 2f
|
|
|
|
and %g2, 0x38, %g2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: subcc %g1, 0x1, %g1
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldub, %o1 + 0x00, %o3))
|
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(stb, %o3, %o1 + %GLOBAL_SPARE))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
bgu,pt %XCC, 1b
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x1, %o1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add %o1, %GLOBAL_SPARE, %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2: cmp %g2, 0x0
|
|
|
|
and %o1, 0x7, %g1
|
|
|
|
be,pt %icc, 3f
|
|
|
|
alignaddr %o1, %g0, %o1
|
|
|
|
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldd, %o1, %f4))
|
|
|
|
1: EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldd, %o1 + 0x8, %f6))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x8, %o1
|
|
|
|
subcc %g2, 0x8, %g2
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f4, %f6, %f0
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(std, %f0, %o0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
be,pn %icc, 3f
|
|
|
|
add %o0, 0x8, %o0
|
|
|
|
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldd, %o1 + 0x8, %f4))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x8, %o1
|
|
|
|
subcc %g2, 0x8, %g2
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f6, %f4, %f0
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(std, %f0, %o0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
bne,pt %icc, 1b
|
|
|
|
add %o0, 0x8, %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Destination is 64-byte aligned. */
|
|
|
|
3:
|
|
|
|
membar #LoadStore | #StoreStore | #StoreLoad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subcc %o2, 0x40, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
add %o1, %g1, %g1
|
|
|
|
andncc %GLOBAL_SPARE, (0x40 - 1), %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
srl %g1, 3, %g2
|
|
|
|
sub %o2, %GLOBAL_SPARE, %g3
|
|
|
|
andn %o1, (0x40 - 1), %o1
|
|
|
|
and %g2, 7, %g2
|
|
|
|
andncc %g3, 0x7, %g3
|
2012-06-27 15:25:23 +07:00
|
|
|
fsrc2 %f0, %f2
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
sub %g3, 0x8, %g3
|
|
|
|
sub %o2, %GLOBAL_SPARE, %o2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add %g1, %GLOBAL_SPARE, %g1
|
|
|
|
subcc %o2, %g3, %o2
|
|
|
|
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD_BLK(%o1, %f0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x40, %o1
|
|
|
|
add %g1, %g3, %g1
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD_BLK(%o1, %f16))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x40, %o1
|
|
|
|
sub %GLOBAL_SPARE, 0x80, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD_BLK(%o1, %f32))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x40, %o1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* There are 8 instances of the unrolled loop,
|
|
|
|
* one for each possible alignment of the
|
|
|
|
* source buffer. Each loop instance is 452
|
|
|
|
* bytes.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
sll %g2, 3, %o3
|
|
|
|
sub %o3, %g2, %o3
|
|
|
|
sllx %o3, 4, %o3
|
|
|
|
add %o3, %g2, %o3
|
|
|
|
sllx %o3, 2, %g2
|
|
|
|
1: rd %pc, %o3
|
|
|
|
add %o3, %lo(1f - 1b), %o3
|
|
|
|
jmpl %o3 + %g2, %g0
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.align 64
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f0, %f2, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 40f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 48f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 56f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f2, %f4, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 41f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 49f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 57f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f4, %f6, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 42f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 50f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 58f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f6, %f8, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 43f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f38,f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 51f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f6, f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f22,f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 59f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f8, %f10, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 44f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f40,f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 52f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f8, f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f24,f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 60f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f10, %f12, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 45f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f42,f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 53f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f10,f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f26,f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 61f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f12, %f14, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 46f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f44,f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 54f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f12,f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f28,f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 62f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK1(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 1f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK2(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 2f)
|
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14)
|
|
|
|
LOOP_CHUNK3(o1, o0, GLOBAL_SPARE, 3f)
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 1b+4
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f14, %f16, %f48
|
|
|
|
1: FREG_FROB(f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 47f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
2: FREG_FROB(f46,f0, f2, f4, f6, f8, f10,f12,f14)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 55f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3: FREG_FROB(f14,f16,f18,f20,f22,f24,f26,f28,f30)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_SYNC(o0, f48)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
FREG_FROB(f30,f32,f34,f36,f38,f40,f42,f44,f46)
|
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots.
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay
slot of a jmpl instruction.
UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in
the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51
The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses
on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing
membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions.
If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the
chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer.
We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but
it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-28 05:42:04 +07:00
|
|
|
STORE_JUMP(o0, f48, 63f)
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f0, f2, g3)
|
|
|
|
41: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f2, f4, g3)
|
|
|
|
42: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f4, f6, g3)
|
|
|
|
43: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f6, f8, g3)
|
|
|
|
44: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f8, f10, g3)
|
|
|
|
45: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f10, f12, g3)
|
|
|
|
46: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f12, f14, g3)
|
|
|
|
47: UNEVEN_VISCHUNK(o0, f14, f0, g3)
|
|
|
|
48: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f16, f18, g3)
|
|
|
|
49: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f18, f20, g3)
|
|
|
|
50: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f20, f22, g3)
|
|
|
|
51: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f22, f24, g3)
|
|
|
|
52: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f24, f26, g3)
|
|
|
|
53: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f26, f28, g3)
|
|
|
|
54: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f28, f30, g3)
|
|
|
|
55: UNEVEN_VISCHUNK(o0, f30, f0, g3)
|
|
|
|
56: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f32, f34, g3)
|
|
|
|
57: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f34, f36, g3)
|
|
|
|
58: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f36, f38, g3)
|
|
|
|
59: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f38, f40, g3)
|
|
|
|
60: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f40, f42, g3)
|
|
|
|
61: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f42, f44, g3)
|
|
|
|
62: FINISH_VISCHUNK(o0, f44, f46, g3)
|
|
|
|
63: UNEVEN_VISCHUNK_LAST(o0, f46, f0, g3)
|
|
|
|
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
93: EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldd, %o1, %f2))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 8, %o1
|
|
|
|
subcc %g3, 8, %g3
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f0, %f2, %f8
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(std, %f8, %o0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
bl,pn %xcc, 95f
|
|
|
|
add %o0, 8, %o0
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldd, %o1, %f0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 8, %o1
|
|
|
|
subcc %g3, 8, %g3
|
|
|
|
faligndata %f2, %f0, %f8
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(std, %f8, %o0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
bge,pt %xcc, 93b
|
|
|
|
add %o0, 8, %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95: brz,pt %o2, 2f
|
|
|
|
mov %g1, %o1
|
|
|
|
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
1: EX_LD_FP(LOAD(ldub, %o1, %o3))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
add %o1, 1, %o1
|
|
|
|
subcc %o2, 1, %o2
|
sparc64: fix FP corruption in user copy functions
Short story: Exception handlers used by some copy_to_user() and
copy_from_user() functions do not diligently clean up floating point
register usage, and this can result in a user process seeing invalid
values in floating point registers. This sometimes makes the process
fail.
Long story: Several cpu-specific (NG4, NG2, U1, U3) memcpy functions
use floating point registers and VIS alignaddr/faligndata to
accelerate data copying when source and dest addresses don't align
well. Linux uses a lazy scheme for saving floating point registers; It
is not done upon entering the kernel since it's a very expensive
operation. Rather, it is done only when needed. If the kernel ends up
not using FP regs during the course of some trap or system call, then
it can return to user space without saving or restoring them.
The various memcpy functions begin their FP code with VISEntry (or a
variation thereof), which saves the FP regs. They conclude their FP
code with VISExit (or a variation) which essentially marks the FP regs
"clean", ie, they contain no unsaved values. fprs.FPRS_FEF is turned
off so that a lazy restore will be triggered when/if the user process
accesses floating point regs again.
The bug is that the user copy variants of memcpy, copy_from_user() and
copy_to_user(), employ an exception handling mechanism to detect faults
when accessing user space addresses, and when this handler is invoked,
an immediate return from the function is forced, and VISExit is not
executed, thus leaving the fprs register in an indeterminate state,
but often with fprs.FPRS_FEF set and one or more dirty bits. This
results in a return to user space with invalid values in the FP regs,
and since fprs.FPRS_FEF is on, no lazy restore occurs.
This bug affects copy_to_user() and copy_from_user() for NG4, NG2,
U3, and U1. All are fixed by using a new exception handler for those
loads and stores that are done during the time between VISEnter and
VISExit.
n.b. In NG4memcpy, the problematic code can be triggered by a copy
size greater than 128 bytes and an unaligned source address. This bug
is known to be the cause of random user process memory corruptions
while perf is running with the callgraph option (ie, perf record -g).
This occurs because perf uses copy_from_user() to read user stacks,
and may fault when it follows a stack frame pointer off to an
invalid page. Validation checks on the stack address just obscure
the underlying problem.
Signed-off-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge <david.j.aldridge@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-23 13:24:49 +07:00
|
|
|
EX_ST_FP(STORE(stb, %o3, %o0))
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
bne,pt %xcc, 1b
|
|
|
|
add %o0, 1, %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2: membar #StoreLoad | #StoreStore
|
|
|
|
VISExit
|
|
|
|
retl
|
|
|
|
mov EX_RETVAL(%o4), %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.align 64
|
|
|
|
70: /* 16 < len <= (5 * 64) */
|
|
|
|
bne,pn %XCC, 75f
|
|
|
|
sub %o0, %o1, %o3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72: andn %o2, 0xf, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
and %o2, 0xf, %o2
|
|
|
|
1: EX_LD(LOAD(ldx, %o1 + 0x00, %o5))
|
|
|
|
EX_LD(LOAD(ldx, %o1 + 0x08, %g1))
|
|
|
|
subcc %GLOBAL_SPARE, 0x10, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stx, %o5, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x8, %o1
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stx, %g1, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
bgu,pt %XCC, 1b
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x8, %o1
|
|
|
|
73: andcc %o2, 0x8, %g0
|
|
|
|
be,pt %XCC, 1f
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
EX_LD(LOAD(ldx, %o1, %o5))
|
|
|
|
sub %o2, 0x8, %o2
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stx, %o5, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x8, %o1
|
|
|
|
1: andcc %o2, 0x4, %g0
|
|
|
|
be,pt %XCC, 1f
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
EX_LD(LOAD(lduw, %o1, %o5))
|
|
|
|
sub %o2, 0x4, %o2
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stw, %o5, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x4, %o1
|
|
|
|
1: cmp %o2, 0
|
|
|
|
be,pt %XCC, 85f
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 90f
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75: andcc %o0, 0x7, %g1
|
|
|
|
sub %g1, 0x8, %g1
|
|
|
|
be,pn %icc, 2f
|
|
|
|
sub %g0, %g1, %g1
|
|
|
|
sub %o2, %g1, %o2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: EX_LD(LOAD(ldub, %o1, %o5))
|
|
|
|
subcc %g1, 1, %g1
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stb, %o5, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
bgu,pt %icc, 1b
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 1, %o1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2: add %o1, %o3, %o0
|
|
|
|
andcc %o1, 0x7, %g1
|
|
|
|
bne,pt %icc, 8f
|
|
|
|
sll %g1, 3, %g1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmp %o2, 16
|
|
|
|
bgeu,pt %icc, 72b
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
ba,a,pt %xcc, 73b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8: mov 64, %o3
|
|
|
|
andn %o1, 0x7, %o1
|
|
|
|
EX_LD(LOAD(ldx, %o1, %g2))
|
|
|
|
sub %o3, %g1, %o3
|
|
|
|
andn %o2, 0x7, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
sllx %g2, %g1, %g2
|
|
|
|
1: EX_LD(LOAD(ldx, %o1 + 0x8, %g3))
|
|
|
|
subcc %GLOBAL_SPARE, 0x8, %GLOBAL_SPARE
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 0x8, %o1
|
|
|
|
srlx %g3, %o3, %o5
|
|
|
|
or %o5, %g2, %o5
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stx, %o5, %o0))
|
|
|
|
add %o0, 0x8, %o0
|
|
|
|
bgu,pt %icc, 1b
|
|
|
|
sllx %g3, %g1, %g2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
srl %g1, 3, %g1
|
|
|
|
andcc %o2, 0x7, %o2
|
|
|
|
be,pn %icc, 85f
|
|
|
|
add %o1, %g1, %o1
|
|
|
|
ba,pt %xcc, 90f
|
|
|
|
sub %o0, %o1, %o3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.align 64
|
|
|
|
80: /* 0 < len <= 16 */
|
|
|
|
andcc %o3, 0x3, %g0
|
|
|
|
bne,pn %XCC, 90f
|
|
|
|
sub %o0, %o1, %o3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: EX_LD(LOAD(lduw, %o1, %g1))
|
|
|
|
subcc %o2, 4, %o2
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stw, %g1, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
bgu,pt %XCC, 1b
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 4, %o1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85: retl
|
|
|
|
mov EX_RETVAL(%o4), %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.align 32
|
|
|
|
90: EX_LD(LOAD(ldub, %o1, %g1))
|
|
|
|
subcc %o2, 1, %o2
|
|
|
|
EX_ST(STORE(stb, %g1, %o1 + %o3))
|
|
|
|
bgu,pt %XCC, 90b
|
|
|
|
add %o1, 1, %o1
|
|
|
|
retl
|
|
|
|
mov EX_RETVAL(%o4), %o0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.size FUNC_NAME, .-FUNC_NAME
|