linux_dsm_epyc7002/net/dsa/dsa2.c

898 lines
18 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* net/dsa/dsa2.c - Hardware switch handling, binding version 2
* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Marvell Semiconductor
* Copyright (c) 2013 Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
* Copyright (c) 2016 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
*/
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_net.h>
#include <net/devlink.h>
#include "dsa_priv.h"
static LIST_HEAD(dsa_tree_list);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dsa2_mutex);
static const struct devlink_ops dsa_devlink_ops = {
};
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_find(int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
list_for_each_entry(dst, &dsa_tree_list, list)
if (dst->index == index)
return dst;
return NULL;
}
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_alloc(int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
dst = kzalloc(sizeof(*dst), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dst)
return NULL;
dst->index = index;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dst->list);
list_add_tail(&dsa_tree_list, &dst->list);
kref_init(&dst->refcount);
return dst;
}
static void dsa_tree_free(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
list_del(&dst->list);
kfree(dst);
}
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_get(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
if (dst)
kref_get(&dst->refcount);
return dst;
}
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_touch(int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
dst = dsa_tree_find(index);
if (dst)
return dsa_tree_get(dst);
else
return dsa_tree_alloc(index);
}
static void dsa_tree_release(struct kref *ref)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
dst = container_of(ref, struct dsa_switch_tree, refcount);
dsa_tree_free(dst);
}
static void dsa_tree_put(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
if (dst)
kref_put(&dst->refcount, dsa_tree_release);
}
static bool dsa_port_is_dsa(struct dsa_port *port)
{
return port->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA;
}
static bool dsa_port_is_cpu(struct dsa_port *port)
{
return port->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU;
}
static bool dsa_port_is_user(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
return dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER;
}
static struct dsa_port *dsa_tree_find_port_by_node(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
struct device_node *dn)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int device, port;
for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
ds = dst->ds[device];
if (!ds)
continue;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = &ds->ports[port];
if (dp->dn == dn)
return dp;
}
}
return NULL;
}
static bool dsa_port_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
struct device_node *dn = dp->dn;
struct of_phandle_iterator it;
struct dsa_port *link_dp;
int err;
of_for_each_phandle(&it, err, dn, "link", NULL, 0) {
link_dp = dsa_tree_find_port_by_node(dst, it.node);
if (!link_dp) {
of_node_put(it.node);
return false;
}
ds->rtable[link_dp->ds->index] = dp->index;
}
return true;
}
static bool dsa_switch_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
bool complete = true;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; i++)
ds->rtable[i] = DSA_RTABLE_NONE;
for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) {
dp = &ds->ports[i];
if (dsa_port_is_dsa(dp)) {
complete = dsa_port_setup_routing_table(dp);
if (!complete)
break;
}
}
return complete;
}
static bool dsa_tree_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
bool complete = true;
int device;
for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
ds = dst->ds[device];
if (!ds)
continue;
complete = dsa_switch_setup_routing_table(ds);
if (!complete)
break;
}
return complete;
}
static struct dsa_port *dsa_tree_find_first_cpu(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int device, port;
for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
ds = dst->ds[device];
if (!ds)
continue;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = &ds->ports[port];
if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp))
return dp;
}
}
return NULL;
}
static int dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int device, port;
/* DSA currently only supports a single CPU port */
dst->cpu_dp = dsa_tree_find_first_cpu(dst);
if (!dst->cpu_dp) {
pr_warn("Tree has no master device\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Assign the default CPU port to all ports of the fabric */
for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
ds = dst->ds[device];
if (!ds)
continue;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = &ds->ports[port];
if (dsa_port_is_user(dp) || dsa_port_is_dsa(dp))
dp->cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp;
}
}
return 0;
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_default_cpu(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
/* DSA currently only supports a single CPU port */
dst->cpu_dp = NULL;
}
static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
const unsigned char *id = (const unsigned char *)&dst->index;
const unsigned char len = sizeof(dst->index);
struct devlink_port *dlp = &dp->devlink_port;
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
bool dsa_port_link_registered = false;
bool devlink_port_registered = false;
struct devlink *dl = ds->devlink;
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
bool dsa_port_enabled = false;
int err = 0;
switch (dp->type) {
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
dsa_port_disable(dp);
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
memset(dlp, 0, sizeof(*dlp));
devlink_port_attrs_set(dlp, DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU,
dp->index, false, 0, id, len);
err = devlink_port_register(dl, dlp, dp->index);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
devlink_port_registered = true;
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
dsa_port_link_registered = true;
err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
dsa_port_enabled = true;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
memset(dlp, 0, sizeof(*dlp));
devlink_port_attrs_set(dlp, DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA,
dp->index, false, 0, id, len);
err = devlink_port_register(dl, dlp, dp->index);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
devlink_port_registered = true;
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
dsa_port_link_registered = true;
err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
dsa_port_enabled = true;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER:
memset(dlp, 0, sizeof(*dlp));
devlink_port_attrs_set(dlp, DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL,
dp->index, false, 0, id, len);
err = devlink_port_register(dl, dlp, dp->index);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
devlink_port_registered = true;
dp->mac = of_get_mac_address(dp->dn);
err = dsa_slave_create(dp);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
break;
devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave);
break;
}
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 19:46:19 +07:00
if (err && dsa_port_enabled)
dsa_port_disable(dp);
if (err && dsa_port_link_registered)
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
if (err && devlink_port_registered)
devlink_port_unregister(dlp);
return err;
}
static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct devlink_port *dlp = &dp->devlink_port;
switch (dp->type) {
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
dsa_port_disable(dp);
dsa_tag_driver_put(dp->tag_ops);
devlink_port_unregister(dlp);
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
dsa_port_disable(dp);
devlink_port_unregister(dlp);
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER:
devlink_port_unregister(dlp);
if (dp->slave) {
dsa_slave_destroy(dp->slave);
dp->slave = NULL;
}
break;
}
}
static int dsa_switch_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
int err = 0;
/* Initialize ds->phys_mii_mask before registering the slave MDIO bus
* driver and before ops->setup() has run, since the switch drivers and
* the slave MDIO bus driver rely on these values for probing PHY
* devices or not
*/
ds->phys_mii_mask |= dsa_user_ports(ds);
/* Add the switch to devlink before calling setup, so that setup can
* add dpipe tables
*/
ds->devlink = devlink_alloc(&dsa_devlink_ops, 0);
if (!ds->devlink)
return -ENOMEM;
err = devlink_register(ds->devlink, ds->dev);
if (err)
goto free_devlink;
err = dsa_switch_register_notifier(ds);
if (err)
goto unregister_devlink;
err = ds->ops->setup(ds);
if (err < 0)
goto unregister_notifier;
if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) {
ds->slave_mii_bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc(ds->dev);
if (!ds->slave_mii_bus) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto unregister_notifier;
}
dsa_slave_mii_bus_init(ds);
err = mdiobus_register(ds->slave_mii_bus);
if (err < 0)
goto unregister_notifier;
}
return 0;
unregister_notifier:
dsa_switch_unregister_notifier(ds);
unregister_devlink:
devlink_unregister(ds->devlink);
free_devlink:
devlink_free(ds->devlink);
ds->devlink = NULL;
return err;
}
static void dsa_switch_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read)
mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
dsa_switch_unregister_notifier(ds);
if (ds->ops->teardown)
ds->ops->teardown(ds);
if (ds->devlink) {
devlink_unregister(ds->devlink);
devlink_free(ds->devlink);
ds->devlink = NULL;
}
}
static int dsa_tree_setup_switches(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int device, port, i;
int err = 0;
for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
ds = dst->ds[device];
if (!ds)
continue;
err = dsa_switch_setup(ds);
if (err)
goto switch_teardown;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = &ds->ports[port];
err = dsa_port_setup(dp);
if (err)
goto ports_teardown;
}
}
return 0;
ports_teardown:
for (i = 0; i < port; i++)
dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]);
dsa_switch_teardown(ds);
switch_teardown:
for (i = 0; i < device; i++) {
ds = dst->ds[i];
if (!ds)
continue;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = &ds->ports[port];
dsa_port_teardown(dp);
}
dsa_switch_teardown(ds);
}
return err;
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_switches(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int device, port;
for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
ds = dst->ds[device];
if (!ds)
continue;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = &ds->ports[port];
dsa_port_teardown(dp);
}
dsa_switch_teardown(ds);
}
}
static int dsa_tree_setup_master(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp;
struct net_device *master = cpu_dp->master;
/* DSA currently supports a single pair of CPU port and master device */
return dsa_master_setup(master, cpu_dp);
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_master(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp;
struct net_device *master = cpu_dp->master;
return dsa_master_teardown(master);
}
static int dsa_tree_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
bool complete;
int err;
if (dst->setup) {
pr_err("DSA: tree %d already setup! Disjoint trees?\n",
dst->index);
return -EEXIST;
}
complete = dsa_tree_setup_routing_table(dst);
if (!complete)
return 0;
err = dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu(dst);
if (err)
return err;
err = dsa_tree_setup_switches(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_default_cpu;
err = dsa_tree_setup_master(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_switches;
dst->setup = true;
pr_info("DSA: tree %d setup\n", dst->index);
return 0;
teardown_switches:
dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
teardown_default_cpu:
dsa_tree_teardown_default_cpu(dst);
return err;
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
if (!dst->setup)
return;
dsa_tree_teardown_master(dst);
dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
dsa_tree_teardown_default_cpu(dst);
pr_info("DSA: tree %d torn down\n", dst->index);
dst->setup = false;
}
static void dsa_tree_remove_switch(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
unsigned int index)
{
dsa_tree_teardown(dst);
dst->ds[index] = NULL;
dsa_tree_put(dst);
}
static int dsa_tree_add_switch(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
unsigned int index = ds->index;
int err;
if (dst->ds[index])
return -EBUSY;
dsa_tree_get(dst);
dst->ds[index] = ds;
err = dsa_tree_setup(dst);
if (err) {
dst->ds[index] = NULL;
dsa_tree_put(dst);
}
return err;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_user(struct dsa_port *dp, const char *name)
{
if (!name)
name = "eth%d";
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER;
dp->name = name;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_dsa(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_cpu(struct dsa_port *dp, struct net_device *master)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops;
enum dsa_tag_protocol tag_protocol;
tag_protocol = ds->ops->get_tag_protocol(ds, dp->index);
tag_ops = dsa_tag_driver_get(tag_protocol);
if (IS_ERR(tag_ops)) {
if (PTR_ERR(tag_ops) == -ENOPROTOOPT)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_warn(ds->dev, "No tagger for this switch\n");
return PTR_ERR(tag_ops);
}
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU;
net: dsa: Allow drivers to filter packets they can decode source port from Frames get processed by DSA and redirected to switch port net devices based on the ETH_P_XDSA multiplexed packet_type handler found by the network stack when calling eth_type_trans(). The running assumption is that once the DSA .rcv function is called, DSA is always able to decode the switch tag in order to change the skb->dev from its master. However there are tagging protocols (such as the new DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105, user of DSA_TAG_PROTO_8021Q) where this assumption is not completely true, since switch tagging piggybacks on the absence of a vlan_filtering bridge. Moreover, management traffic (BPDU, PTP) for this switch doesn't rely on switch tagging, but on a different mechanism. So it would make sense to at least be able to terminate that. Having DSA receive traffic it can't decode would put it in an impossible situation: the eth_type_trans() function would invoke the DSA .rcv(), which could not change skb->dev, then eth_type_trans() would be invoked again, which again would call the DSA .rcv, and the packet would never be able to exit the DSA filter and would spiral in a loop until the whole system dies. This happens because eth_type_trans() doesn't actually look at the skb (so as to identify a potential tag) when it deems it as being ETH_P_XDSA. It just checks whether skb->dev has a DSA private pointer installed (therefore it's a DSA master) and that there exists a .rcv callback (everybody except DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE has that). This is understandable as there are many switch tags out there, and exhaustively checking for all of them is far from ideal. The solution lies in introducing a filtering function for each tagging protocol. In the absence of a filtering function, all traffic is passed to the .rcv DSA callback. The tagging protocol should see the filtering function as a pre-validation that it can decode the incoming skb. The traffic that doesn't match the filter will bypass the DSA .rcv callback and be left on the master netdevice, which wasn't previously possible. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 17:19:23 +07:00
dp->filter = tag_ops->filter;
dp->rcv = tag_ops->rcv;
dp->tag_ops = tag_ops;
dp->master = master;
dp->dst = dst;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_of(struct dsa_port *dp, struct device_node *dn)
{
struct device_node *ethernet = of_parse_phandle(dn, "ethernet", 0);
const char *name = of_get_property(dn, "label", NULL);
bool link = of_property_read_bool(dn, "link");
dp->dn = dn;
if (ethernet) {
struct net_device *master;
master = of_find_net_device_by_node(ethernet);
if (!master)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
return dsa_port_parse_cpu(dp, master);
}
if (link)
return dsa_port_parse_dsa(dp);
return dsa_port_parse_user(dp, name);
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct device_node *dn)
{
struct device_node *ports, *port;
struct dsa_port *dp;
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 14:22:19 +07:00
int err = 0;
u32 reg;
ports = of_get_child_by_name(dn, "ports");
if (!ports) {
dev_err(ds->dev, "no ports child node found\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
for_each_available_child_of_node(ports, port) {
err = of_property_read_u32(port, "reg", &reg);
if (err)
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 14:22:19 +07:00
goto out_put_node;
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 14:22:19 +07:00
if (reg >= ds->num_ports) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_put_node;
}
dp = &ds->ports[reg];
err = dsa_port_parse_of(dp, port);
if (err)
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 14:22:19 +07:00
goto out_put_node;
}
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 14:22:19 +07:00
out_put_node:
of_node_put(ports);
return err;
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_member_of(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct device_node *dn)
{
u32 m[2] = { 0, 0 };
int sz;
/* Don't error out if this optional property isn't found */
sz = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(dn, "dsa,member", m, 2, 2);
if (sz < 0 && sz != -EINVAL)
return sz;
ds->index = m[1];
if (ds->index >= DSA_MAX_SWITCHES)
return -EINVAL;
ds->dst = dsa_tree_touch(m[0]);
if (!ds->dst)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_of(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device_node *dn)
{
int err;
err = dsa_switch_parse_member_of(ds, dn);
if (err)
return err;
return dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(ds, dn);
}
static int dsa_port_parse(struct dsa_port *dp, const char *name,
struct device *dev)
{
if (!strcmp(name, "cpu")) {
struct net_device *master;
master = dsa_dev_to_net_device(dev);
if (!master)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_put(master);
return dsa_port_parse_cpu(dp, master);
}
if (!strcmp(name, "dsa"))
return dsa_port_parse_dsa(dp);
return dsa_port_parse_user(dp, name);
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_ports(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct dsa_chip_data *cd)
{
bool valid_name_found = false;
struct dsa_port *dp;
struct device *dev;
const char *name;
unsigned int i;
int err;
for (i = 0; i < DSA_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
name = cd->port_names[i];
dev = cd->netdev[i];
dp = &ds->ports[i];
if (!name)
continue;
err = dsa_port_parse(dp, name, dev);
if (err)
return err;
valid_name_found = true;
}
if (!valid_name_found && i == DSA_MAX_PORTS)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_switch_parse(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct dsa_chip_data *cd)
{
ds->cd = cd;
/* We don't support interconnected switches nor multiple trees via
* platform data, so this is the unique switch of the tree.
*/
ds->index = 0;
ds->dst = dsa_tree_touch(0);
if (!ds->dst)
return -ENOMEM;
return dsa_switch_parse_ports(ds, cd);
}
static int dsa_switch_add(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
return dsa_tree_add_switch(dst, ds);
}
static int dsa_switch_probe(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_chip_data *pdata = ds->dev->platform_data;
struct device_node *np = ds->dev->of_node;
int err;
if (np)
err = dsa_switch_parse_of(ds, np);
else if (pdata)
err = dsa_switch_parse(ds, pdata);
else
err = -ENODEV;
if (err)
return err;
return dsa_switch_add(ds);
}
struct dsa_switch *dsa_switch_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t n)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds;
int i;
ds = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(ds, ports, n), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ds)
return NULL;
ds->dev = dev;
ds->num_ports = n;
for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; ++i) {
ds->ports[i].index = i;
ds->ports[i].ds = ds;
}
return ds;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_switch_alloc);
int dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
int err;
mutex_lock(&dsa2_mutex);
err = dsa_switch_probe(ds);
dsa_tree_put(ds->dst);
mutex_unlock(&dsa2_mutex);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_register_switch);
static void dsa_switch_remove(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
unsigned int index = ds->index;
dsa_tree_remove_switch(dst, index);
}
void dsa_unregister_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
mutex_lock(&dsa2_mutex);
dsa_switch_remove(ds);
mutex_unlock(&dsa2_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_unregister_switch);