linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c

538 lines
13 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright 2014 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* All Rights Reserved.
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
* "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
* without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
* distribute, sub license, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
* permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
* the following conditions:
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS, AUTHORS AND/OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM,
* DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
* OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE
* USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the
* next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
* of the Software.
*
*/
/*
* Authors:
* Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
*/
/**
* DOC: MMU Notifier
*
* For coherent userptr handling registers an MMU notifier to inform the driver
* about updates on the page tables of a process.
*
* When somebody tries to invalidate the page tables we block the update until
* all operations on the pages in question are completed, then those pages are
* marked as accessed and also dirty if it wasn't a read only access.
*
* New command submissions using the userptrs in question are delayed until all
* page table invalidation are completed and we once more see a coherent process
* address space.
*/
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <linux/interval_tree.h>
#include <drm/drmP.h>
#include <drm/drm.h>
#include "amdgpu.h"
#include "amdgpu_amdkfd.h"
/**
* struct amdgpu_mn
*
* @adev: amdgpu device pointer
* @mm: process address space
* @mn: MMU notifier structure
* @type: type of MMU notifier
* @work: destruction work item
* @node: hash table node to find structure by adev and mn
* @lock: rw semaphore protecting the notifier nodes
* @objects: interval tree containing amdgpu_mn_nodes
* @read_lock: mutex for recursive locking of @lock
* @recursion: depth of recursion
*
* Data for each amdgpu device and process address space.
*/
struct amdgpu_mn {
/* constant after initialisation */
struct amdgpu_device *adev;
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct mmu_notifier mn;
enum amdgpu_mn_type type;
/* only used on destruction */
struct work_struct work;
/* protected by adev->mn_lock */
struct hlist_node node;
/* objects protected by lock */
struct rw_semaphore lock;
struct rb_root_cached objects;
struct mutex read_lock;
atomic_t recursion;
};
/**
* struct amdgpu_mn_node
*
* @it: interval node defining start-last of the affected address range
* @bos: list of all BOs in the affected address range
*
* Manages all BOs which are affected of a certain range of address space.
*/
struct amdgpu_mn_node {
struct interval_tree_node it;
struct list_head bos;
};
/**
* amdgpu_mn_destroy - destroy the MMU notifier
*
* @work: previously sheduled work item
*
* Lazy destroys the notifier from a work item
*/
static void amdgpu_mn_destroy(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct amdgpu_mn *amn = container_of(work, struct amdgpu_mn, work);
struct amdgpu_device *adev = amn->adev;
struct amdgpu_mn_node *node, *next_node;
struct amdgpu_bo *bo, *next_bo;
mutex_lock(&adev->mn_lock);
down_write(&amn->lock);
hash_del(&amn->node);
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(node, next_node,
&amn->objects.rb_root, it.rb) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next_bo, &node->bos, mn_list) {
bo->mn = NULL;
list_del_init(&bo->mn_list);
}
kfree(node);
}
up_write(&amn->lock);
mutex_unlock(&adev->mn_lock);
mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(&amn->mn, amn->mm);
kfree(amn);
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_release - callback to notify about mm destruction
*
* @mn: our notifier
* @mm: the mm this callback is about
*
* Shedule a work item to lazy destroy our notifier.
*/
static void amdgpu_mn_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct amdgpu_mn *amn = container_of(mn, struct amdgpu_mn, mn);
INIT_WORK(&amn->work, amdgpu_mn_destroy);
schedule_work(&amn->work);
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_lock - take the write side lock for this notifier
*
* @mn: our notifier
*/
void amdgpu_mn_lock(struct amdgpu_mn *mn)
{
if (mn)
down_write(&mn->lock);
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_unlock - drop the write side lock for this notifier
*
* @mn: our notifier
*/
void amdgpu_mn_unlock(struct amdgpu_mn *mn)
{
if (mn)
up_write(&mn->lock);
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_read_lock - take the read side lock for this notifier
*
* @amn: our notifier
*/
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
static int amdgpu_mn_read_lock(struct amdgpu_mn *amn, bool blockable)
{
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
if (blockable)
mutex_lock(&amn->read_lock);
else if (!mutex_trylock(&amn->read_lock))
return -EAGAIN;
if (atomic_inc_return(&amn->recursion) == 1)
down_read_non_owner(&amn->lock);
mutex_unlock(&amn->read_lock);
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
return 0;
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_read_unlock - drop the read side lock for this notifier
*
* @amn: our notifier
*/
static void amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(struct amdgpu_mn *amn)
{
if (atomic_dec_return(&amn->recursion) == 0)
up_read_non_owner(&amn->lock);
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node - unmap all BOs of a node
*
* @node: the node with the BOs to unmap
* @start: start of address range affected
* @end: end of address range affected
*
* Block for operations on BOs to finish and mark pages as accessed and
* potentially dirty.
*/
static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node(struct amdgpu_mn_node *node,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
long r;
list_for_each_entry(bo, &node->bos, mn_list) {
if (!amdgpu_ttm_tt_affect_userptr(bo->tbo.ttm, start, end))
continue;
r = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->tbo.resv,
true, false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
if (r <= 0)
DRM_ERROR("(%ld) failed to wait for user bo\n", r);
amdgpu_ttm_tt_mark_user_pages(bo->tbo.ttm);
}
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start_gfx - callback to notify about mm change
*
* @mn: our notifier
* @mm: the mm this callback is about
* @start: start of updated range
* @end: end of updated range
*
* Block for operations on BOs to finish and mark pages as accessed and
* potentially dirty.
*/
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
static int amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start_gfx(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
unsigned long end,
bool blockable)
{
struct amdgpu_mn *amn = container_of(mn, struct amdgpu_mn, mn);
struct interval_tree_node *it;
/* notification is exclusive, but interval is inclusive */
end -= 1;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
/* TODO we should be able to split locking for interval tree and
* amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node
*/
if (amdgpu_mn_read_lock(amn, blockable))
return -EAGAIN;
it = interval_tree_iter_first(&amn->objects, start, end);
while (it) {
struct amdgpu_mn_node *node;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
if (!blockable) {
amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(amn);
return -EAGAIN;
}
node = container_of(it, struct amdgpu_mn_node, it);
it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end);
amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node(node, start, end);
}
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
return 0;
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start_hsa - callback to notify about mm change
*
* @mn: our notifier
* @mm: the mm this callback is about
* @start: start of updated range
* @end: end of updated range
*
* We temporarily evict all BOs between start and end. This
* necessitates evicting all user-mode queues of the process. The BOs
* are restorted in amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end_hsa.
*/
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
static int amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start_hsa(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
unsigned long end,
bool blockable)
{
struct amdgpu_mn *amn = container_of(mn, struct amdgpu_mn, mn);
struct interval_tree_node *it;
/* notification is exclusive, but interval is inclusive */
end -= 1;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
if (amdgpu_mn_read_lock(amn, blockable))
return -EAGAIN;
it = interval_tree_iter_first(&amn->objects, start, end);
while (it) {
struct amdgpu_mn_node *node;
struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
if (!blockable) {
amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(amn);
return -EAGAIN;
}
node = container_of(it, struct amdgpu_mn_node, it);
it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end);
list_for_each_entry(bo, &node->bos, mn_list) {
struct kgd_mem *mem = bo->kfd_bo;
if (amdgpu_ttm_tt_affect_userptr(bo->tbo.ttm,
start, end))
amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr(mem, mm);
}
}
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 11:52:33 +07:00
return 0;
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end - callback to notify about mm change
*
* @mn: our notifier
* @mm: the mm this callback is about
* @start: start of updated range
* @end: end of updated range
*
* Release the lock again to allow new command submissions.
*/
static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
struct amdgpu_mn *amn = container_of(mn, struct amdgpu_mn, mn);
amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(amn);
}
static const struct mmu_notifier_ops amdgpu_mn_ops[] = {
[AMDGPU_MN_TYPE_GFX] = {
.release = amdgpu_mn_release,
.invalidate_range_start = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start_gfx,
.invalidate_range_end = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end,
},
[AMDGPU_MN_TYPE_HSA] = {
.release = amdgpu_mn_release,
.invalidate_range_start = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start_hsa,
.invalidate_range_end = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end,
},
};
/* Low bits of any reasonable mm pointer will be unused due to struct
* alignment. Use these bits to make a unique key from the mm pointer
* and notifier type.
*/
#define AMDGPU_MN_KEY(mm, type) ((unsigned long)(mm) + (type))
/**
* amdgpu_mn_get - create notifier context
*
* @adev: amdgpu device pointer
* @type: type of MMU notifier context
*
* Creates a notifier context for current->mm.
*/
struct amdgpu_mn *amdgpu_mn_get(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
enum amdgpu_mn_type type)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct amdgpu_mn *amn;
unsigned long key = AMDGPU_MN_KEY(mm, type);
int r;
mutex_lock(&adev->mn_lock);
if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
mutex_unlock(&adev->mn_lock);
return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
}
hash_for_each_possible(adev->mn_hash, amn, node, key)
if (AMDGPU_MN_KEY(amn->mm, amn->type) == key)
goto release_locks;
amn = kzalloc(sizeof(*amn), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!amn) {
amn = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
goto release_locks;
}
amn->adev = adev;
amn->mm = mm;
init_rwsem(&amn->lock);
amn->type = type;
amn->mn.ops = &amdgpu_mn_ops[type];
amn->objects = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
mutex_init(&amn->read_lock);
atomic_set(&amn->recursion, 0);
r = __mmu_notifier_register(&amn->mn, mm);
if (r)
goto free_amn;
hash_add(adev->mn_hash, &amn->node, AMDGPU_MN_KEY(mm, type));
release_locks:
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_unlock(&adev->mn_lock);
return amn;
free_amn:
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
mutex_unlock(&adev->mn_lock);
kfree(amn);
return ERR_PTR(r);
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_register - register a BO for notifier updates
*
* @bo: amdgpu buffer object
* @addr: userptr addr we should monitor
*
* Registers an MMU notifier for the given BO at the specified address.
* Returns 0 on success, -ERRNO if anything goes wrong.
*/
int amdgpu_mn_register(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, unsigned long addr)
{
unsigned long end = addr + amdgpu_bo_size(bo) - 1;
struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
enum amdgpu_mn_type type =
bo->kfd_bo ? AMDGPU_MN_TYPE_HSA : AMDGPU_MN_TYPE_GFX;
struct amdgpu_mn *amn;
struct amdgpu_mn_node *node = NULL, *new_node;
struct list_head bos;
struct interval_tree_node *it;
amn = amdgpu_mn_get(adev, type);
if (IS_ERR(amn))
return PTR_ERR(amn);
new_node = kmalloc(sizeof(*new_node), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_node)
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bos);
down_write(&amn->lock);
while ((it = interval_tree_iter_first(&amn->objects, addr, end))) {
kfree(node);
node = container_of(it, struct amdgpu_mn_node, it);
interval_tree_remove(&node->it, &amn->objects);
addr = min(it->start, addr);
end = max(it->last, end);
list_splice(&node->bos, &bos);
}
if (!node)
node = new_node;
else
kfree(new_node);
bo->mn = amn;
node->it.start = addr;
node->it.last = end;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->bos);
list_splice(&bos, &node->bos);
list_add(&bo->mn_list, &node->bos);
interval_tree_insert(&node->it, &amn->objects);
up_write(&amn->lock);
return 0;
}
/**
* amdgpu_mn_unregister - unregister a BO for notifier updates
*
* @bo: amdgpu buffer object
*
* Remove any registration of MMU notifier updates from the buffer object.
*/
void amdgpu_mn_unregister(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
struct amdgpu_mn *amn;
struct list_head *head;
mutex_lock(&adev->mn_lock);
amn = bo->mn;
if (amn == NULL) {
mutex_unlock(&adev->mn_lock);
return;
}
down_write(&amn->lock);
/* save the next list entry for later */
head = bo->mn_list.next;
bo->mn = NULL;
list_del_init(&bo->mn_list);
if (list_empty(head)) {
struct amdgpu_mn_node *node;
node = container_of(head, struct amdgpu_mn_node, bos);
interval_tree_remove(&node->it, &amn->objects);
kfree(node);
}
up_write(&amn->lock);
mutex_unlock(&adev->mn_lock);
}