2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
IB/{hfi1, rdmavt, qib}: Implement CQ completion vector support
Currently the driver doesn't support completion vectors. These
are used to indicate which sets of CQs should be grouped together
into the same vector. A vector is a CQ processing thread that
runs on a specific CPU.
If an application has several CQs bound to different completion
vectors, and each completion vector runs on different CPUs, then
the completion queue workload is balanced. This helps scale as more
nodes are used.
Implement CQ completion vector support using a global workqueue
where a CQ entry is queued to the CPU corresponding to the CQ's
completion vector. Since the workqueue is global, it's guaranteed
to always be there when queueing CQ entries; Therefore, the RCU
locking for cq->rdi->worker in the hot path is superfluous.
Each completion vector is assigned to a different CPU. The number of
completion vectors available is computed by taking the number of
online, physical CPUs from the local NUMA node and subtracting the
CPUs used for kernel receive queues and the general interrupt.
Special use cases:
* If there are no CPUs left for completion vectors, the same CPU
for the general interrupt is used; Therefore, there would only
be one completion vector available.
* For multi-HFI systems, the number of completion vectors available
for each device is the total number of completion vectors in
the local NUMA node divided by the number of devices in the same
NUMA node. If there's a division remainder, the first device to
get initialized gets an extra completion vector.
Upon a CQ creation, an invalid completion vector could be specified.
Handle it as follows:
* If the completion vector is less than 0, set it to 0.
* Set the completion vector to the result of the passed completion
vector moded with the number of device completion vectors
available.
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2018-05-02 20:43:55 +07:00
|
|
|
* Copyright(c) 2015 - 2018 Intel Corporation.
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file is provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
|
|
|
|
* redistributing this file, you may do so under either license.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* GPL LICENSE SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
|
|
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
|
|
|
|
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
|
|
|
* General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* BSD LICENSE
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
|
|
|
|
* the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
|
|
|
|
* distribution.
|
|
|
|
* - Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
|
|
|
|
* contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
|
|
|
|
* from this software without specific prior written permission.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
|
|
|
* "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
|
|
|
* LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
|
|
|
|
* A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
* OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
|
|
|
|
* SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
|
|
|
* LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
|
|
|
|
* DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
|
|
|
|
* THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
|
|
|
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
|
|
|
|
* OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifndef _HFI1_AFFINITY_H
|
|
|
|
#define _HFI1_AFFINITY_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "hfi.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enum irq_type {
|
|
|
|
IRQ_SDMA,
|
|
|
|
IRQ_RCVCTXT,
|
|
|
|
IRQ_GENERAL,
|
|
|
|
IRQ_OTHER
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Can be used for both memory and cpu */
|
|
|
|
enum affinity_flags {
|
|
|
|
AFF_AUTO,
|
|
|
|
AFF_NUMA_LOCAL,
|
|
|
|
AFF_DEV_LOCAL,
|
|
|
|
AFF_IRQ_LOCAL
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-13 01:30:08 +07:00
|
|
|
struct cpu_mask_set {
|
|
|
|
struct cpumask mask;
|
|
|
|
struct cpumask used;
|
|
|
|
uint gen;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
struct hfi1_msix_entry;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-13 01:30:08 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Initialize non-HT cpu cores mask */
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
void init_real_cpu_mask(void);
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Initialize driver affinity data */
|
2017-05-26 19:35:25 +07:00
|
|
|
int hfi1_dev_affinity_init(struct hfi1_devdata *dd);
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Set IRQ affinity to a CPU. The function will determine the
|
|
|
|
* CPU and set the affinity to it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-05-26 19:35:25 +07:00
|
|
|
int hfi1_get_irq_affinity(struct hfi1_devdata *dd,
|
|
|
|
struct hfi1_msix_entry *msix);
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Remove the IRQ's CPU affinity. This function also updates
|
|
|
|
* any internal CPU tracking data
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-05-26 19:35:25 +07:00
|
|
|
void hfi1_put_irq_affinity(struct hfi1_devdata *dd,
|
|
|
|
struct hfi1_msix_entry *msix);
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Determine a CPU affinity for a user process, if the process does not
|
|
|
|
* have an affinity set yet.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-05-26 19:35:25 +07:00
|
|
|
int hfi1_get_proc_affinity(int node);
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Release a CPU used by a user process. */
|
2017-05-26 19:35:25 +07:00
|
|
|
void hfi1_put_proc_affinity(int cpu);
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct hfi1_affinity_node {
|
|
|
|
int node;
|
IB/{hfi1, rdmavt, qib}: Implement CQ completion vector support
Currently the driver doesn't support completion vectors. These
are used to indicate which sets of CQs should be grouped together
into the same vector. A vector is a CQ processing thread that
runs on a specific CPU.
If an application has several CQs bound to different completion
vectors, and each completion vector runs on different CPUs, then
the completion queue workload is balanced. This helps scale as more
nodes are used.
Implement CQ completion vector support using a global workqueue
where a CQ entry is queued to the CPU corresponding to the CQ's
completion vector. Since the workqueue is global, it's guaranteed
to always be there when queueing CQ entries; Therefore, the RCU
locking for cq->rdi->worker in the hot path is superfluous.
Each completion vector is assigned to a different CPU. The number of
completion vectors available is computed by taking the number of
online, physical CPUs from the local NUMA node and subtracting the
CPUs used for kernel receive queues and the general interrupt.
Special use cases:
* If there are no CPUs left for completion vectors, the same CPU
for the general interrupt is used; Therefore, there would only
be one completion vector available.
* For multi-HFI systems, the number of completion vectors available
for each device is the total number of completion vectors in
the local NUMA node divided by the number of devices in the same
NUMA node. If there's a division remainder, the first device to
get initialized gets an extra completion vector.
Upon a CQ creation, an invalid completion vector could be specified.
Handle it as follows:
* If the completion vector is less than 0, set it to 0.
* Set the completion vector to the result of the passed completion
vector moded with the number of device completion vectors
available.
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2018-05-02 20:43:55 +07:00
|
|
|
u16 __percpu *comp_vect_affinity;
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct cpu_mask_set def_intr;
|
|
|
|
struct cpu_mask_set rcv_intr;
|
2016-07-25 21:54:48 +07:00
|
|
|
struct cpumask general_intr_mask;
|
IB/{hfi1, rdmavt, qib}: Implement CQ completion vector support
Currently the driver doesn't support completion vectors. These
are used to indicate which sets of CQs should be grouped together
into the same vector. A vector is a CQ processing thread that
runs on a specific CPU.
If an application has several CQs bound to different completion
vectors, and each completion vector runs on different CPUs, then
the completion queue workload is balanced. This helps scale as more
nodes are used.
Implement CQ completion vector support using a global workqueue
where a CQ entry is queued to the CPU corresponding to the CQ's
completion vector. Since the workqueue is global, it's guaranteed
to always be there when queueing CQ entries; Therefore, the RCU
locking for cq->rdi->worker in the hot path is superfluous.
Each completion vector is assigned to a different CPU. The number of
completion vectors available is computed by taking the number of
online, physical CPUs from the local NUMA node and subtracting the
CPUs used for kernel receive queues and the general interrupt.
Special use cases:
* If there are no CPUs left for completion vectors, the same CPU
for the general interrupt is used; Therefore, there would only
be one completion vector available.
* For multi-HFI systems, the number of completion vectors available
for each device is the total number of completion vectors in
the local NUMA node divided by the number of devices in the same
NUMA node. If there's a division remainder, the first device to
get initialized gets an extra completion vector.
Upon a CQ creation, an invalid completion vector could be specified.
Handle it as follows:
* If the completion vector is less than 0, set it to 0.
* Set the completion vector to the result of the passed completion
vector moded with the number of device completion vectors
available.
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2018-05-02 20:43:55 +07:00
|
|
|
struct cpumask comp_vect_mask;
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct hfi1_affinity_node_list {
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
struct cpumask real_cpu_mask;
|
|
|
|
struct cpu_mask_set proc;
|
IB/hfi1: Refine user process affinity algorithm
When performing process affinity recommendations for MPI ranks, the current
algorithm doesn't take into account multiple HFI units. Also, real
cores and HT cores are not distinguished from one another. Therefore,
all HT cores are recommended to be assigned first within the local NUMA
node before recommending the assignments of cores in other NUMA nodes.
It's ideal to assign all real cores across all NUMA nodes first, then all
HT 1 cores, then all HT 2 cores, and so on to balance CPU workload. CPU
cores in other NUMA nodes could be running interrupt handlers, and this is
not taken into account.
To balance the CPU workload for user processes, the following
recommendation algorithm is used:
For each user process that is opening a context on HFI Y:
a) If all cores are assigned to user processes, start assignments all
over from the first core
b) Assign real cores first, then HT cores (First set of HT cores on
all physical cores, then second set of HT cores, and, so on) in the
following order:
1. Same NUMA node as HFI Y and not running an IRQ handler
2. Same NUMA node as HFI Y and running an IRQ handler
3. Different NUMA node to HFI Y and not running an IRQ handler
4. Different NUMA node to HFI Y and running an IRQ handler
c) Mark core as assigned in the global affinity structure. As user
processes are done, remove core assignments from global affinity
structure.
This implementation allows an arbitrary number of HT cores and provides
support for multiple HFIs.
This is being included in the kernel rather than user space due to the
fact that user space has no way of knowing the CPU recommendations for
contexts running as part of other jobs.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2016-07-25 21:54:57 +07:00
|
|
|
int num_core_siblings;
|
2016-12-08 10:34:19 +07:00
|
|
|
int num_possible_nodes;
|
IB/hfi1: Refine user process affinity algorithm
When performing process affinity recommendations for MPI ranks, the current
algorithm doesn't take into account multiple HFI units. Also, real
cores and HT cores are not distinguished from one another. Therefore,
all HT cores are recommended to be assigned first within the local NUMA
node before recommending the assignments of cores in other NUMA nodes.
It's ideal to assign all real cores across all NUMA nodes first, then all
HT 1 cores, then all HT 2 cores, and so on to balance CPU workload. CPU
cores in other NUMA nodes could be running interrupt handlers, and this is
not taken into account.
To balance the CPU workload for user processes, the following
recommendation algorithm is used:
For each user process that is opening a context on HFI Y:
a) If all cores are assigned to user processes, start assignments all
over from the first core
b) Assign real cores first, then HT cores (First set of HT cores on
all physical cores, then second set of HT cores, and, so on) in the
following order:
1. Same NUMA node as HFI Y and not running an IRQ handler
2. Same NUMA node as HFI Y and running an IRQ handler
3. Different NUMA node to HFI Y and not running an IRQ handler
4. Different NUMA node to HFI Y and running an IRQ handler
c) Mark core as assigned in the global affinity structure. As user
processes are done, remove core assignments from global affinity
structure.
This implementation allows an arbitrary number of HT cores and provides
support for multiple HFIs.
This is being included in the kernel rather than user space due to the
fact that user space has no way of knowing the CPU recommendations for
contexts running as part of other jobs.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2016-07-25 21:54:57 +07:00
|
|
|
int num_online_nodes;
|
|
|
|
int num_online_cpus;
|
2016-09-06 18:36:18 +07:00
|
|
|
struct mutex lock; /* protects affinity nodes */
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 21:54:48 +07:00
|
|
|
int node_affinity_init(void);
|
IB/{hfi1, rdmavt, qib}: Implement CQ completion vector support
Currently the driver doesn't support completion vectors. These
are used to indicate which sets of CQs should be grouped together
into the same vector. A vector is a CQ processing thread that
runs on a specific CPU.
If an application has several CQs bound to different completion
vectors, and each completion vector runs on different CPUs, then
the completion queue workload is balanced. This helps scale as more
nodes are used.
Implement CQ completion vector support using a global workqueue
where a CQ entry is queued to the CPU corresponding to the CQ's
completion vector. Since the workqueue is global, it's guaranteed
to always be there when queueing CQ entries; Therefore, the RCU
locking for cq->rdi->worker in the hot path is superfluous.
Each completion vector is assigned to a different CPU. The number of
completion vectors available is computed by taking the number of
online, physical CPUs from the local NUMA node and subtracting the
CPUs used for kernel receive queues and the general interrupt.
Special use cases:
* If there are no CPUs left for completion vectors, the same CPU
for the general interrupt is used; Therefore, there would only
be one completion vector available.
* For multi-HFI systems, the number of completion vectors available
for each device is the total number of completion vectors in
the local NUMA node divided by the number of devices in the same
NUMA node. If there's a division remainder, the first device to
get initialized gets an extra completion vector.
Upon a CQ creation, an invalid completion vector could be specified.
Handle it as follows:
* If the completion vector is less than 0, set it to 0.
* Set the completion vector to the result of the passed completion
vector moded with the number of device completion vectors
available.
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2018-05-02 20:43:55 +07:00
|
|
|
void node_affinity_destroy_all(void);
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
extern struct hfi1_affinity_node_list node_affinity;
|
IB/{hfi1, rdmavt, qib}: Implement CQ completion vector support
Currently the driver doesn't support completion vectors. These
are used to indicate which sets of CQs should be grouped together
into the same vector. A vector is a CQ processing thread that
runs on a specific CPU.
If an application has several CQs bound to different completion
vectors, and each completion vector runs on different CPUs, then
the completion queue workload is balanced. This helps scale as more
nodes are used.
Implement CQ completion vector support using a global workqueue
where a CQ entry is queued to the CPU corresponding to the CQ's
completion vector. Since the workqueue is global, it's guaranteed
to always be there when queueing CQ entries; Therefore, the RCU
locking for cq->rdi->worker in the hot path is superfluous.
Each completion vector is assigned to a different CPU. The number of
completion vectors available is computed by taking the number of
online, physical CPUs from the local NUMA node and subtracting the
CPUs used for kernel receive queues and the general interrupt.
Special use cases:
* If there are no CPUs left for completion vectors, the same CPU
for the general interrupt is used; Therefore, there would only
be one completion vector available.
* For multi-HFI systems, the number of completion vectors available
for each device is the total number of completion vectors in
the local NUMA node divided by the number of devices in the same
NUMA node. If there's a division remainder, the first device to
get initialized gets an extra completion vector.
Upon a CQ creation, an invalid completion vector could be specified.
Handle it as follows:
* If the completion vector is less than 0, set it to 0.
* Set the completion vector to the result of the passed completion
vector moded with the number of device completion vectors
available.
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
2018-05-02 20:43:55 +07:00
|
|
|
void hfi1_dev_affinity_clean_up(struct hfi1_devdata *dd);
|
|
|
|
int hfi1_comp_vect_mappings_lookup(struct rvt_dev_info *rdi, int comp_vect);
|
|
|
|
int hfi1_comp_vectors_set_up(struct hfi1_devdata *dd);
|
|
|
|
void hfi1_comp_vectors_clean_up(struct hfi1_devdata *dd);
|
2016-07-25 21:52:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-04 05:33:40 +07:00
|
|
|
#endif /* _HFI1_AFFINITY_H */
|