linux_dsm_epyc7002/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c

530 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Copyright (C) 1991, 1992 Linus Torvalds
* Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs
* Copyright (C) 2011 Don Zickus Red Hat, Inc.
*
* Pentium III FXSR, SSE support
* Gareth Hughes <gareth@valinux.com>, May 2000
*/
/*
* Handle hardware traps and faults.
*/
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/kdebug.h>
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
#include <linux/nmi.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
x86/exceptions: Split debug IST stack The debug IST stack is actually two separate debug stacks to handle #DB recursion. This is required because the CPU starts always at top of stack on exception entry, which means on #DB recursion the second #DB would overwrite the stack of the first. The low level entry code therefore adjusts the top of stack on entry so a secondary #DB starts from a different stack page. But the stack pages are adjacent without a guard page between them. Split the debug stack into 3 stacks which are separated by guard pages. The 3rd stack is never mapped into the cpu_entry_area and is only there to catch triple #DB nesting: --- top of DB_stack <- Initial stack --- end of DB_stack guard page --- top of DB1_stack <- Top of stack after entering first #DB --- end of DB1_stack guard page --- top of DB2_stack <- Top of stack after entering second #DB --- end of DB2_stack guard page If DB2 would not act as the final guard hole, a second #DB would point the top of #DB stack to the stack below #DB1 which would be valid and not catch the not so desired triple nesting. The backing store does not allocate any memory for DB2 and its guard page as it is not going to be mapped into the cpu_entry_area. - Adjust the low level entry code so it adjusts top of #DB with the offset between the stacks instead of exception stack size. - Make the dumpstack code aware of the new stacks. - Adjust the in_debug_stack() implementation and move it into the NMI code where it belongs. As this is NMI hotpath code, it just checks the full area between top of DB_stack and bottom of DB1_stack without checking for the guard page. That's correct because the NMI cannot hit a stackpointer pointing to the guard page between DB and DB1 stack. Even if it would, then the NMI operation still is unaffected, but the resume of the debug exception on the topmost DB stack will crash by touching the guard page. [ bp: Make exception_stack_names static const char * const ] Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190414160145.439944544@linutronix.de
2019-04-14 22:59:57 +07:00
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
x86/exceptions: Split debug IST stack The debug IST stack is actually two separate debug stacks to handle #DB recursion. This is required because the CPU starts always at top of stack on exception entry, which means on #DB recursion the second #DB would overwrite the stack of the first. The low level entry code therefore adjusts the top of stack on entry so a secondary #DB starts from a different stack page. But the stack pages are adjacent without a guard page between them. Split the debug stack into 3 stacks which are separated by guard pages. The 3rd stack is never mapped into the cpu_entry_area and is only there to catch triple #DB nesting: --- top of DB_stack <- Initial stack --- end of DB_stack guard page --- top of DB1_stack <- Top of stack after entering first #DB --- end of DB1_stack guard page --- top of DB2_stack <- Top of stack after entering second #DB --- end of DB2_stack guard page If DB2 would not act as the final guard hole, a second #DB would point the top of #DB stack to the stack below #DB1 which would be valid and not catch the not so desired triple nesting. The backing store does not allocate any memory for DB2 and its guard page as it is not going to be mapped into the cpu_entry_area. - Adjust the low level entry code so it adjusts top of #DB with the offset between the stacks instead of exception stack size. - Make the dumpstack code aware of the new stacks. - Adjust the in_debug_stack() implementation and move it into the NMI code where it belongs. As this is NMI hotpath code, it just checks the full area between top of DB_stack and bottom of DB1_stack without checking for the guard page. That's correct because the NMI cannot hit a stackpointer pointing to the guard page between DB and DB1 stack. Even if it would, then the NMI operation still is unaffected, but the resume of the debug exception on the topmost DB stack will crash by touching the guard page. [ bp: Make exception_stack_names static const char * const ] Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190414160145.439944544@linutronix.de
2019-04-14 22:59:57 +07:00
#include <asm/cpu_entry_area.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/mach_traps.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
#include <asm/nmi.h>
#include <asm/x86_init.h>
x86/nmi: Save regs in crash dump on external NMI Now, multiple CPUs can receive an external NMI simultaneously by specifying the "apic_extnmi=all" command line parameter. When we take a crash dump by using external NMI with this option, we fail to save registers into the crash dump. This happens as follows: CPU 0 CPU 1 ================================ ============================= receive an external NMI default_do_nmi() receive an external NMI spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock) default_do_nmi() io_check_error() spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock) panic() busy loop ... kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() issue NMI IPI -----------> blocked until IRET busy loop... Here, since CPU 1 is in NMI context, an additional NMI from CPU 0 remains unhandled until CPU 1 IRETs. However, CPU 1 will never execute IRET so the NMI is not handled and the callback function to save registers is never called. To solve this issue, we check if the IPI for crash dumping was issued while waiting for nmi_reason_lock to be released, and if so, call its callback function directly. If the IPI is not issued (e.g. kdump is disabled), the actual behavior doesn't change. Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210065245.4587.39316.stgit@softrs Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:13 +07:00
#include <asm/reboot.h>
#include <asm/cache.h>
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/nmi.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
struct nmi_desc {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
struct list_head head;
};
static struct nmi_desc nmi_desc[NMI_MAX] =
{
{
.lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&nmi_desc[0].lock),
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
.head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(nmi_desc[0].head),
},
{
.lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&nmi_desc[1].lock),
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
.head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(nmi_desc[1].head),
},
{
.lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&nmi_desc[2].lock),
.head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(nmi_desc[2].head),
},
{
.lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&nmi_desc[3].lock),
.head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(nmi_desc[3].head),
},
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
};
struct nmi_stats {
unsigned int normal;
unsigned int unknown;
unsigned int external;
unsigned int swallow;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct nmi_stats, nmi_stats);
static int ignore_nmis __read_mostly;
int unknown_nmi_panic;
/*
* Prevent NMI reason port (0x61) being accessed simultaneously, can
* only be used in NMI handler.
*/
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(nmi_reason_lock);
static int __init setup_unknown_nmi_panic(char *str)
{
unknown_nmi_panic = 1;
return 1;
}
__setup("unknown_nmi_panic", setup_unknown_nmi_panic);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
#define nmi_to_desc(type) (&nmi_desc[type])
static u64 nmi_longest_ns = 1 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
static int __init nmi_warning_debugfs(void)
{
debugfs_create_u64("nmi_longest_ns", 0644,
arch_debugfs_dir, &nmi_longest_ns);
return 0;
}
fs_initcall(nmi_warning_debugfs);
static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
{
u64 whole_msecs = READ_ONCE(action->max_duration);
int remainder_ns, decimal_msecs;
if (duration < nmi_longest_ns || duration < action->max_duration)
return;
action->max_duration = duration;
remainder_ns = do_div(whole_msecs, (1000 * 1000));
decimal_msecs = remainder_ns / 1000;
printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
"INFO: NMI handler (%ps) took too long to run: %lld.%03d msecs\n",
action->handler, whole_msecs, decimal_msecs);
}
static int nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs)
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
{
struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type);
struct nmiaction *a;
int handled=0;
rcu_read_lock();
/*
* NMIs are edge-triggered, which means if you have enough
* of them concurrently, you can lose some because only one
* can be latched at any given time. Walk the whole list
* to handle those situations.
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu(a, &desc->head, list) {
int thishandled;
u64 delta;
delta = sched_clock();
thishandled = a->handler(type, regs);
handled += thishandled;
delta = sched_clock() - delta;
trace_nmi_handler(a->handler, (int)delta, thishandled);
nmi_check_duration(a, delta);
}
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
rcu_read_unlock();
/* return total number of NMI events handled */
return handled;
}
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(nmi_handle);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
x86/nmi: Fix page faults by nmiaction if kmemcheck is enabled This patch tries to fix the problem of page fault exception caused by accessing nmiaction structure in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled. If kmemcheck is enabled, the memory allocated through slab are in pages that are marked non-present, so that some checks could be done in the page fault handling code ( e.g. whether the memory is read before written to ). As nmiaction is allocated in this way, so it resides in a non-present page. Then there is a page fault while the nmi code accessing the nmiaction structure, which would then cause a warning by WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) in kmemcheck_fault(), called by do_page_fault(). This significantly simplifies the code as well, as the whole dynamic allocation dance goes away. v2: as Peter suggested, changed the nmiaction to use static storage. v3: as Peter suggested, use macro to shorten the codes. Also keep the original usage of register_nmi_handler, so users of this call doesn't need change. Tested-by: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Fixes: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/2/356 Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ simplified the wrappers ] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: thomas.mingarelli@hp.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333051877-15755-4-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com [ tidied the patch a bit ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-03-30 03:11:17 +07:00
int __register_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, struct nmiaction *action)
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
{
struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type);
unsigned long flags;
x86/nmi: Fix page faults by nmiaction if kmemcheck is enabled This patch tries to fix the problem of page fault exception caused by accessing nmiaction structure in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled. If kmemcheck is enabled, the memory allocated through slab are in pages that are marked non-present, so that some checks could be done in the page fault handling code ( e.g. whether the memory is read before written to ). As nmiaction is allocated in this way, so it resides in a non-present page. Then there is a page fault while the nmi code accessing the nmiaction structure, which would then cause a warning by WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) in kmemcheck_fault(), called by do_page_fault(). This significantly simplifies the code as well, as the whole dynamic allocation dance goes away. v2: as Peter suggested, changed the nmiaction to use static storage. v3: as Peter suggested, use macro to shorten the codes. Also keep the original usage of register_nmi_handler, so users of this call doesn't need change. Tested-by: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Fixes: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/2/356 Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ simplified the wrappers ] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: thomas.mingarelli@hp.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333051877-15755-4-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com [ tidied the patch a bit ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-03-30 03:11:17 +07:00
if (!action->handler)
return -EINVAL;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
/*
* Indicate if there are multiple registrations on the
* internal NMI handler call chains (SERR and IO_CHECK).
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(type == NMI_SERR && !list_empty(&desc->head));
WARN_ON_ONCE(type == NMI_IO_CHECK && !list_empty(&desc->head));
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
/*
* some handlers need to be executed first otherwise a fake
* event confuses some handlers (kdump uses this flag)
*/
if (action->flags & NMI_FLAG_FIRST)
list_add_rcu(&action->list, &desc->head);
else
list_add_tail_rcu(&action->list, &desc->head);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
return 0;
}
x86/nmi: Fix page faults by nmiaction if kmemcheck is enabled This patch tries to fix the problem of page fault exception caused by accessing nmiaction structure in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled. If kmemcheck is enabled, the memory allocated through slab are in pages that are marked non-present, so that some checks could be done in the page fault handling code ( e.g. whether the memory is read before written to ). As nmiaction is allocated in this way, so it resides in a non-present page. Then there is a page fault while the nmi code accessing the nmiaction structure, which would then cause a warning by WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) in kmemcheck_fault(), called by do_page_fault(). This significantly simplifies the code as well, as the whole dynamic allocation dance goes away. v2: as Peter suggested, changed the nmiaction to use static storage. v3: as Peter suggested, use macro to shorten the codes. Also keep the original usage of register_nmi_handler, so users of this call doesn't need change. Tested-by: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Fixes: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/2/356 Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ simplified the wrappers ] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: thomas.mingarelli@hp.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333051877-15755-4-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com [ tidied the patch a bit ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-03-30 03:11:17 +07:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__register_nmi_handler);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
x86/nmi: Fix page faults by nmiaction if kmemcheck is enabled This patch tries to fix the problem of page fault exception caused by accessing nmiaction structure in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled. If kmemcheck is enabled, the memory allocated through slab are in pages that are marked non-present, so that some checks could be done in the page fault handling code ( e.g. whether the memory is read before written to ). As nmiaction is allocated in this way, so it resides in a non-present page. Then there is a page fault while the nmi code accessing the nmiaction structure, which would then cause a warning by WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) in kmemcheck_fault(), called by do_page_fault(). This significantly simplifies the code as well, as the whole dynamic allocation dance goes away. v2: as Peter suggested, changed the nmiaction to use static storage. v3: as Peter suggested, use macro to shorten the codes. Also keep the original usage of register_nmi_handler, so users of this call doesn't need change. Tested-by: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Fixes: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/2/356 Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ simplified the wrappers ] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: thomas.mingarelli@hp.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333051877-15755-4-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com [ tidied the patch a bit ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-03-30 03:11:17 +07:00
void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const char *name)
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
{
struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type);
struct nmiaction *n;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
list_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &desc->head, list) {
/*
* the name passed in to describe the nmi handler
* is used as the lookup key
*/
if (!strcmp(n->name, name)) {
WARN(in_nmi(),
"Trying to free NMI (%s) from NMI context!\n", n->name);
list_del_rcu(&n->list);
break;
}
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:20 +07:00
synchronize_rcu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_nmi_handler);
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
static void
pci_serr_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/* check to see if anyone registered against these types of errors */
if (nmi_handle(NMI_SERR, regs))
return;
pr_emerg("NMI: PCI system error (SERR) for reason %02x on CPU %d.\n",
reason, smp_processor_id());
if (panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even if looping in NMI context Currently, kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus(), a subroutine of crash_kexec(), sends an NMI IPI to CPUs which haven't called panic() to stop them, save their register information and do some cleanups for crash dumping. However, if such a CPU is infinitely looping in NMI context, we fail to save its register information into the crash dump. For example, this can happen when unknown NMIs are broadcast to all CPUs as follows: CPU 0 CPU 1 =========================== ========================== receive an unknown NMI unknown_nmi_error() panic() receive an unknown NMI spin_trylock(&panic_lock) unknown_nmi_error() crash_kexec() panic() spin_trylock(&panic_lock) panic_smp_self_stop() infinite loop kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() issue NMI IPI -----------> blocked until IRET infinite loop... Here, since CPU 1 is in NMI context, the second NMI from CPU 0 is blocked until CPU 1 executes IRET. However, CPU 1 never executes IRET, so the NMI is not handled and the callback function to save registers is never called. In practice, this can happen on some servers which broadcast NMIs to all CPUs when the NMI button is pushed. To save registers in this case, we need to: a) Return from NMI handler instead of looping infinitely or b) Call the callback function directly from the infinite loop Inherently, a) is risky because NMI is also used to prevent corrupted data from being propagated to devices. So, we chose b). This patch does the following: 1. Move the infinite looping of CPUs which haven't called panic() in NMI context (actually done by panic_smp_self_stop()) outside of panic() to enable us to refer pt_regs. Please note that panic_smp_self_stop() is still used for normal context. 2. Call a callback of kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() directly to save registers and do some cleanups after setting waiting_for_crash_ipi which is used for counting down the number of CPUs which handled the callback Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com> Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Cc: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210014628.25437.75256.stgit@softrs [ Cleanup comments, fixup formatting. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:10 +07:00
nmi_panic(regs, "NMI: Not continuing");
pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
/* Clear and disable the PCI SERR error line. */
reason = (reason & NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MASK) | NMI_REASON_CLEAR_SERR;
outb(reason, NMI_REASON_PORT);
}
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(pci_serr_error);
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
static void
io_check_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long i;
/* check to see if anyone registered against these types of errors */
if (nmi_handle(NMI_IO_CHECK, regs))
return;
pr_emerg(
"NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) for reason %02x on CPU %d.\n",
reason, smp_processor_id());
show_regs(regs);
panic, x86: Fix re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI If panic on NMI happens just after panic() on the same CPU, panic() is recursively called. Kernel stalls, as a result, after failing to acquire panic_lock. To avoid this problem, don't call panic() in NMI context if we've already entered panic(). For that, introduce nmi_panic() macro to reduce code duplication. In the case of panic on NMI, don't return from NMI handlers if another CPU already panicked. Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com> Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Cc: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210014626.25437.13302.stgit@softrs [ Cleanup comments, fixup formatting. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:09 +07:00
if (panic_on_io_nmi) {
panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even if looping in NMI context Currently, kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus(), a subroutine of crash_kexec(), sends an NMI IPI to CPUs which haven't called panic() to stop them, save their register information and do some cleanups for crash dumping. However, if such a CPU is infinitely looping in NMI context, we fail to save its register information into the crash dump. For example, this can happen when unknown NMIs are broadcast to all CPUs as follows: CPU 0 CPU 1 =========================== ========================== receive an unknown NMI unknown_nmi_error() panic() receive an unknown NMI spin_trylock(&panic_lock) unknown_nmi_error() crash_kexec() panic() spin_trylock(&panic_lock) panic_smp_self_stop() infinite loop kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() issue NMI IPI -----------> blocked until IRET infinite loop... Here, since CPU 1 is in NMI context, the second NMI from CPU 0 is blocked until CPU 1 executes IRET. However, CPU 1 never executes IRET, so the NMI is not handled and the callback function to save registers is never called. In practice, this can happen on some servers which broadcast NMIs to all CPUs when the NMI button is pushed. To save registers in this case, we need to: a) Return from NMI handler instead of looping infinitely or b) Call the callback function directly from the infinite loop Inherently, a) is risky because NMI is also used to prevent corrupted data from being propagated to devices. So, we chose b). This patch does the following: 1. Move the infinite looping of CPUs which haven't called panic() in NMI context (actually done by panic_smp_self_stop()) outside of panic() to enable us to refer pt_regs. Please note that panic_smp_self_stop() is still used for normal context. 2. Call a callback of kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() directly to save registers and do some cleanups after setting waiting_for_crash_ipi which is used for counting down the number of CPUs which handled the callback Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com> Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Cc: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210014628.25437.75256.stgit@softrs [ Cleanup comments, fixup formatting. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:10 +07:00
nmi_panic(regs, "NMI IOCK error: Not continuing");
panic, x86: Fix re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI If panic on NMI happens just after panic() on the same CPU, panic() is recursively called. Kernel stalls, as a result, after failing to acquire panic_lock. To avoid this problem, don't call panic() in NMI context if we've already entered panic(). For that, introduce nmi_panic() macro to reduce code duplication. In the case of panic on NMI, don't return from NMI handlers if another CPU already panicked. Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com> Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Cc: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210014626.25437.13302.stgit@softrs [ Cleanup comments, fixup formatting. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:09 +07:00
/*
* If we end up here, it means we have received an NMI while
* processing panic(). Simply return without delaying and
* re-enabling NMIs.
*/
return;
}
/* Re-enable the IOCK line, wait for a few seconds */
reason = (reason & NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MASK) | NMI_REASON_CLEAR_IOCHK;
outb(reason, NMI_REASON_PORT);
i = 20000;
while (--i) {
touch_nmi_watchdog();
udelay(100);
}
reason &= ~NMI_REASON_CLEAR_IOCHK;
outb(reason, NMI_REASON_PORT);
}
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(io_check_error);
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
static void
unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int handled;
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
/*
* Use 'false' as back-to-back NMIs are dealt with one level up.
* Of course this makes having multiple 'unknown' handlers useless
* as only the first one is ever run (unless it can actually determine
* if it caused the NMI)
*/
handled = nmi_handle(NMI_UNKNOWN, regs);
if (handled) {
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.unknown, handled);
return;
}
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.unknown, 1);
pr_emerg("Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason %02x on CPU %d.\n",
reason, smp_processor_id());
pr_emerg("Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?\n");
if (unknown_nmi_panic || panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even if looping in NMI context Currently, kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus(), a subroutine of crash_kexec(), sends an NMI IPI to CPUs which haven't called panic() to stop them, save their register information and do some cleanups for crash dumping. However, if such a CPU is infinitely looping in NMI context, we fail to save its register information into the crash dump. For example, this can happen when unknown NMIs are broadcast to all CPUs as follows: CPU 0 CPU 1 =========================== ========================== receive an unknown NMI unknown_nmi_error() panic() receive an unknown NMI spin_trylock(&panic_lock) unknown_nmi_error() crash_kexec() panic() spin_trylock(&panic_lock) panic_smp_self_stop() infinite loop kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() issue NMI IPI -----------> blocked until IRET infinite loop... Here, since CPU 1 is in NMI context, the second NMI from CPU 0 is blocked until CPU 1 executes IRET. However, CPU 1 never executes IRET, so the NMI is not handled and the callback function to save registers is never called. In practice, this can happen on some servers which broadcast NMIs to all CPUs when the NMI button is pushed. To save registers in this case, we need to: a) Return from NMI handler instead of looping infinitely or b) Call the callback function directly from the infinite loop Inherently, a) is risky because NMI is also used to prevent corrupted data from being propagated to devices. So, we chose b). This patch does the following: 1. Move the infinite looping of CPUs which haven't called panic() in NMI context (actually done by panic_smp_self_stop()) outside of panic() to enable us to refer pt_regs. Please note that panic_smp_self_stop() is still used for normal context. 2. Call a callback of kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() directly to save registers and do some cleanups after setting waiting_for_crash_ipi which is used for counting down the number of CPUs which handled the callback Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Gobinda Charan Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com> Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Cc: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210014628.25437.75256.stgit@softrs [ Cleanup comments, fixup formatting. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:10 +07:00
nmi_panic(regs, "NMI: Not continuing");
pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
}
kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation under arch/x86. This applies nokprobe_inline annotation for some cases, because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring the symbol address. This just folds a bunch of previous NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() cleanup patches for x86 to one patch. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081814.26341.51656.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-04-17 15:18:14 +07:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unknown_nmi_error);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, swallow_nmi);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, last_nmi_rip);
static noinstr void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned char reason = 0;
int handled;
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
bool b2b = false;
/*
* CPU-specific NMI must be processed before non-CPU-specific
* NMI, otherwise we may lose it, because the CPU-specific
* NMI can not be detected/processed on other CPUs.
*/
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
/*
* Back-to-back NMIs are interesting because they can either
* be two NMI or more than two NMIs (any thing over two is dropped
* due to NMI being edge-triggered). If this is the second half
* of the back-to-back NMI, assume we dropped things and process
* more handlers. Otherwise reset the 'swallow' NMI behaviour
*/
if (regs->ip == __this_cpu_read(last_nmi_rip))
b2b = true;
else
__this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, false);
__this_cpu_write(last_nmi_rip, regs->ip);
instrumentation_begin();
trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
handled = nmi_handle(NMI_LOCAL, regs);
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.normal, handled);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
if (handled) {
/*
* There are cases when a NMI handler handles multiple
* events in the current NMI. One of these events may
* be queued for in the next NMI. Because the event is
* already handled, the next NMI will result in an unknown
* NMI. Instead lets flag this for a potential NMI to
* swallow.
*/
if (handled > 1)
__this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, true);
goto out;
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
}
x86/nmi: Save regs in crash dump on external NMI Now, multiple CPUs can receive an external NMI simultaneously by specifying the "apic_extnmi=all" command line parameter. When we take a crash dump by using external NMI with this option, we fail to save registers into the crash dump. This happens as follows: CPU 0 CPU 1 ================================ ============================= receive an external NMI default_do_nmi() receive an external NMI spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock) default_do_nmi() io_check_error() spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock) panic() busy loop ... kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() issue NMI IPI -----------> blocked until IRET busy loop... Here, since CPU 1 is in NMI context, an additional NMI from CPU 0 remains unhandled until CPU 1 IRETs. However, CPU 1 will never execute IRET so the NMI is not handled and the callback function to save registers is never called. To solve this issue, we check if the IPI for crash dumping was issued while waiting for nmi_reason_lock to be released, and if so, call its callback function directly. If the IPI is not issued (e.g. kdump is disabled), the actual behavior doesn't change. Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151210065245.4587.39316.stgit@softrs Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-12-14 17:19:13 +07:00
/*
* Non-CPU-specific NMI: NMI sources can be processed on any CPU.
*
* Another CPU may be processing panic routines while holding
* nmi_reason_lock. Check if the CPU issued the IPI for crash dumping,
* and if so, call its callback directly. If there is no CPU preparing
* crash dump, we simply loop here.
*/
while (!raw_spin_trylock(&nmi_reason_lock)) {
run_crash_ipi_callback(regs);
cpu_relax();
}
reason = x86_platform.get_nmi_reason();
if (reason & NMI_REASON_MASK) {
if (reason & NMI_REASON_SERR)
pci_serr_error(reason, regs);
else if (reason & NMI_REASON_IOCHK)
io_check_error(reason, regs);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
/*
* Reassert NMI in case it became active
* meanwhile as it's edge-triggered:
*/
reassert_nmi();
#endif
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.external, 1);
raw_spin_unlock(&nmi_reason_lock);
goto out;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&nmi_reason_lock);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
/*
* Only one NMI can be latched at a time. To handle
* this we may process multiple nmi handlers at once to
* cover the case where an NMI is dropped. The downside
* to this approach is we may process an NMI prematurely,
* while its real NMI is sitting latched. This will cause
* an unknown NMI on the next run of the NMI processing.
*
* We tried to flag that condition above, by setting the
* swallow_nmi flag when we process more than one event.
* This condition is also only present on the second half
* of a back-to-back NMI, so we flag that condition too.
*
* If both are true, we assume we already processed this
* NMI previously and we swallow it. Otherwise we reset
* the logic.
*
* There are scenarios where we may accidentally swallow
* a 'real' unknown NMI. For example, while processing
* a perf NMI another perf NMI comes in along with a
* 'real' unknown NMI. These two NMIs get combined into
* one (as described above). When the next NMI gets
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
* processed, it will be flagged by perf as handled, but
* no one will know that there was a 'real' unknown NMI sent
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
* also. As a result it gets swallowed. Or if the first
* perf NMI returns two events handled then the second
* NMI will get eaten by the logic below, again losing a
* 'real' unknown NMI. But this is the best we can do
* for now.
*/
if (b2b && __this_cpu_read(swallow_nmi))
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.swallow, 1);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
else
unknown_nmi_error(reason, regs);
out:
if (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
instrumentation_end();
}
2011-12-14 04:44:16 +07:00
/*
* NMIs can page fault or hit breakpoints which will cause it to lose
* its NMI context with the CPU when the breakpoint or page fault does an IRET.
*
* As a result, NMIs can nest if NMIs get unmasked due an IRET during
* NMI processing. On x86_64, the asm glue protects us from nested NMIs
* if the outer NMI came from kernel mode, but we can still nest if the
* outer NMI came from user mode.
*
* To handle these nested NMIs, we have three states:
2011-12-14 04:44:16 +07:00
*
* 1) not running
* 2) executing
* 3) latched
*
* When no NMI is in progress, it is in the "not running" state.
* When an NMI comes in, it goes into the "executing" state.
* Normally, if another NMI is triggered, it does not interrupt
* the running NMI and the HW will simply latch it so that when
* the first NMI finishes, it will restart the second NMI.
* (Note, the latch is binary, thus multiple NMIs triggering,
* when one is running, are ignored. Only one NMI is restarted.)
*
* If an NMI executes an iret, another NMI can preempt it. We do not
* want to allow this new NMI to run, but we want to execute it when the
* first one finishes. We set the state to "latched", and the exit of
* the first NMI will perform a dec_return, if the result is zero
* (NOT_RUNNING), then it will simply exit the NMI handler. If not, the
* dec_return would have set the state to NMI_EXECUTING (what we want it
* to be when we are running). In this case, we simply jump back to
* rerun the NMI handler again, and restart the 'latched' NMI.
*
* No trap (breakpoint or page fault) should be hit before nmi_restart,
* thus there is no race between the first check of state for NOT_RUNNING
* and setting it to NMI_EXECUTING. The HW will prevent nested NMIs
* at this point.
*
* In case the NMI takes a page fault, we need to save off the CR2
* because the NMI could have preempted another page fault and corrupt
* the CR2 that is about to be read. As nested NMIs must be restarted
* and they can not take breakpoints or page faults, the update of the
* CR2 must be done before converting the nmi state back to NOT_RUNNING.
* Otherwise, there would be a race of another nested NMI coming in
* after setting state to NOT_RUNNING but before updating the nmi_cr2.
2011-12-14 04:44:16 +07:00
*/
enum nmi_states {
NMI_NOT_RUNNING = 0,
2011-12-14 04:44:16 +07:00
NMI_EXECUTING,
NMI_LATCHED,
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(enum nmi_states, nmi_state);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, nmi_cr2);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, nmi_dr7);
DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW(exc_nmi)
2011-12-14 04:44:16 +07:00
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) && cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
return;
if (this_cpu_read(nmi_state) != NMI_NOT_RUNNING) {
this_cpu_write(nmi_state, NMI_LATCHED);
return;
}
this_cpu_write(nmi_state, NMI_EXECUTING);
this_cpu_write(nmi_cr2, read_cr2());
nmi_restart:
this_cpu_write(nmi_dr7, local_db_save());
2011-12-14 04:44:16 +07:00
nmi_enter();
inc_irq_stat(__nmi_count);
if (!ignore_nmis)
default_do_nmi(regs);
nmi_exit();
local_db_restore(this_cpu_read(nmi_dr7));
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(nmi_cr2) != read_cr2()))
write_cr2(this_cpu_read(nmi_cr2));
if (this_cpu_dec_return(nmi_state))
goto nmi_restart;
if (user_mode(regs))
mds_user_clear_cpu_buffers();
}
void stop_nmi(void)
{
ignore_nmis++;
}
void restart_nmi(void)
{
ignore_nmis--;
}
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-10-01 02:06:22 +07:00
/* reset the back-to-back NMI logic */
void local_touch_nmi(void)
{
__this_cpu_write(last_nmi_rip, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(local_touch_nmi);