linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2408.c

354 lines
9.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* w1_ds2408.c - w1 family 29 (DS2408) driver
*
* Copyright (c) 2010 Jean-Francois Dagenais <dagenaisj@sonatest.com>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/w1.h>
#define W1_FAMILY_DS2408 0x29
#define W1_F29_RETRIES 3
#define W1_F29_REG_LOGIG_STATE 0x88 /* R */
#define W1_F29_REG_OUTPUT_LATCH_STATE 0x89 /* R */
#define W1_F29_REG_ACTIVITY_LATCH_STATE 0x8A /* R */
#define W1_F29_REG_COND_SEARCH_SELECT_MASK 0x8B /* RW */
#define W1_F29_REG_COND_SEARCH_POL_SELECT 0x8C /* RW */
#define W1_F29_REG_CONTROL_AND_STATUS 0x8D /* RW */
#define W1_F29_FUNC_READ_PIO_REGS 0xF0
#define W1_F29_FUNC_CHANN_ACCESS_READ 0xF5
#define W1_F29_FUNC_CHANN_ACCESS_WRITE 0x5A
/* also used to write the control/status reg (0x8D): */
#define W1_F29_FUNC_WRITE_COND_SEARCH_REG 0xCC
#define W1_F29_FUNC_RESET_ACTIVITY_LATCHES 0xC3
#define W1_F29_SUCCESS_CONFIRM_BYTE 0xAA
static int _read_reg(struct w1_slave *sl, u8 address, unsigned char* buf)
{
u8 wrbuf[3];
dev_dbg(&sl->dev,
"Reading with slave: %p, reg addr: %0#4x, buff addr: %p",
sl, (unsigned int)address, buf);
if (!buf)
return -EINVAL;
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
dev_dbg(&sl->dev, "mutex locked");
if (w1_reset_select_slave(sl)) {
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
return -EIO;
}
wrbuf[0] = W1_F29_FUNC_READ_PIO_REGS;
wrbuf[1] = address;
wrbuf[2] = 0;
w1_write_block(sl->master, wrbuf, 3);
*buf = w1_read_8(sl->master);
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
dev_dbg(&sl->dev, "mutex unlocked");
return 1;
}
static ssize_t state_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf, loff_t off,
size_t count)
{
dev_dbg(&kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj)->dev,
"Reading %s kobj: %p, off: %0#10x, count: %zu, buff addr: %p",
bin_attr->attr.name, kobj, (unsigned int)off, count, buf);
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
return _read_reg(kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj), W1_F29_REG_LOGIG_STATE, buf);
}
static ssize_t output_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
dev_dbg(&kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj)->dev,
"Reading %s kobj: %p, off: %0#10x, count: %zu, buff addr: %p",
bin_attr->attr.name, kobj, (unsigned int)off, count, buf);
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
return _read_reg(kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj),
W1_F29_REG_OUTPUT_LATCH_STATE, buf);
}
static ssize_t activity_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
dev_dbg(&kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj)->dev,
"Reading %s kobj: %p, off: %0#10x, count: %zu, buff addr: %p",
bin_attr->attr.name, kobj, (unsigned int)off, count, buf);
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
return _read_reg(kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj),
W1_F29_REG_ACTIVITY_LATCH_STATE, buf);
}
static ssize_t cond_search_mask_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
dev_dbg(&kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj)->dev,
"Reading %s kobj: %p, off: %0#10x, count: %zu, buff addr: %p",
bin_attr->attr.name, kobj, (unsigned int)off, count, buf);
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
return _read_reg(kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj),
W1_F29_REG_COND_SEARCH_SELECT_MASK, buf);
}
static ssize_t cond_search_polarity_read(struct file *filp,
struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
{
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
return _read_reg(kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj),
W1_F29_REG_COND_SEARCH_POL_SELECT, buf);
}
static ssize_t status_control_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
return _read_reg(kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj),
W1_F29_REG_CONTROL_AND_STATUS, buf);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2408_READBACK
static bool optional_read_back_valid(struct w1_slave *sl, u8 expected)
{
u8 w1_buf[3];
if (w1_reset_resume_command(sl->master))
return false;
w1_buf[0] = W1_F29_FUNC_READ_PIO_REGS;
w1_buf[1] = W1_F29_REG_OUTPUT_LATCH_STATE;
w1_buf[2] = 0;
w1_write_block(sl->master, w1_buf, 3);
return (w1_read_8(sl->master) == expected);
}
#else
static bool optional_read_back_valid(struct w1_slave *sl, u8 expected)
{
return true;
}
#endif
static ssize_t output_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
u8 w1_buf[3];
unsigned int retries = W1_F29_RETRIES;
ssize_t bytes_written = -EIO;
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
dev_dbg(&sl->dev, "locking mutex for write_output");
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
dev_dbg(&sl->dev, "mutex locked");
if (w1_reset_select_slave(sl))
goto out;
do {
w1_buf[0] = W1_F29_FUNC_CHANN_ACCESS_WRITE;
w1_buf[1] = *buf;
w1_buf[2] = ~(*buf);
w1_write_block(sl->master, w1_buf, 3);
if (w1_read_8(sl->master) == W1_F29_SUCCESS_CONFIRM_BYTE &&
optional_read_back_valid(sl, *buf)) {
bytes_written = 1;
goto out;
}
if (w1_reset_resume_command(sl->master))
goto out; /* unrecoverable error */
/* try again, the slave is ready for a command */
} while (--retries);
out:
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
dev_dbg(&sl->dev, "%s, mutex unlocked retries:%d\n",
(bytes_written > 0) ? "succeeded" : "error", retries);
return bytes_written;
}
/**
* Writing to the activity file resets the activity latches.
*/
static ssize_t activity_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
unsigned int retries = W1_F29_RETRIES;
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
if (w1_reset_select_slave(sl))
goto error;
while (retries--) {
w1_write_8(sl->master, W1_F29_FUNC_RESET_ACTIVITY_LATCHES);
if (w1_read_8(sl->master) == W1_F29_SUCCESS_CONFIRM_BYTE) {
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
return 1;
}
if (w1_reset_resume_command(sl->master))
goto error;
}
error:
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
return -EIO;
}
static ssize_t status_control_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
loff_t off, size_t count)
{
struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
u8 w1_buf[4];
unsigned int retries = W1_F29_RETRIES;
if (count != 1 || off != 0)
return -EFAULT;
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
if (w1_reset_select_slave(sl))
goto error;
while (retries--) {
w1_buf[0] = W1_F29_FUNC_WRITE_COND_SEARCH_REG;
w1_buf[1] = W1_F29_REG_CONTROL_AND_STATUS;
w1_buf[2] = 0;
w1_buf[3] = *buf;
w1_write_block(sl->master, w1_buf, 4);
if (w1_reset_resume_command(sl->master))
goto error;
w1_buf[0] = W1_F29_FUNC_READ_PIO_REGS;
w1_buf[1] = W1_F29_REG_CONTROL_AND_STATUS;
w1_buf[2] = 0;
w1_write_block(sl->master, w1_buf, 3);
if (w1_read_8(sl->master) == *buf) {
/* success! */
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
return 1;
}
}
error:
W1: split master mutex to avoid deadlocks. The 'mutex' in struct w1_master is use for two very different purposes. Firstly it protects various data structures such as the list of all slaves. Secondly it protects the w1 buss against concurrent accesses. This can lead to deadlocks when the ->probe code called while adding a slave needs to talk on the bus, as is the case for power_supply devices. ds2780 and ds2781 drivers contain a work around to track which process hold the lock simply to avoid this deadlock. bq27000 doesn't have that work around and so deadlocks. There are other possible deadlocks involving sysfs. When removing a device the sysfs s_active lock is held, so the lock that protects the slave list must take precedence over s_active. However when access power_supply attributes via sysfs, the s_active lock must take precedence over the lock that protects accesses to the bus. So to avoid deadlocks between w1 slaves and sysfs, these must be two separate locks. Making them separate means that the work around in ds2780 and ds2781 can be removed. So this patch: - adds a new mutex: "bus_mutex" which serialises access to the bus. - takes in mutex in w1_search and ds1wm_search while they access the bus for searching. The mutex is dropped before calling the callback which adds the slave. - changes all slaves to use bus_mutex instead of mutex to protect access to the bus - removes w1_ds2790_io_nolock and w1_ds2781_io_nolock, and the related code from drivers/power/ds278[01]_battery.c which calls them. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-18 12:59:52 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
return -EIO;
}
/*
* This is a special sequence we must do to ensure the P0 output is not stuck
* in test mode. This is described in rev 2 of the ds2408's datasheet
* (http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS2408.pdf) under
* "APPLICATION INFORMATION/Power-up timing".
*/
static int w1_f29_disable_test_mode(struct w1_slave *sl)
{
int res;
u8 magic[10] = {0x96, };
u64 rn = le64_to_cpu(*((u64*)&sl->reg_num));
memcpy(&magic[1], &rn, 8);
magic[9] = 0x3C;
mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
res = w1_reset_bus(sl->master);
if (res)
goto out;
w1_write_block(sl->master, magic, ARRAY_SIZE(magic));
res = w1_reset_bus(sl->master);
out:
mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
return res;
}
static BIN_ATTR_RO(state, 1);
static BIN_ATTR_RW(output, 1);
static BIN_ATTR_RW(activity, 1);
static BIN_ATTR_RO(cond_search_mask, 1);
static BIN_ATTR_RO(cond_search_polarity, 1);
static BIN_ATTR_RW(status_control, 1);
static struct bin_attribute *w1_f29_bin_attrs[] = {
&bin_attr_state,
&bin_attr_output,
&bin_attr_activity,
&bin_attr_cond_search_mask,
&bin_attr_cond_search_polarity,
&bin_attr_status_control,
NULL,
};
static const struct attribute_group w1_f29_group = {
.bin_attrs = w1_f29_bin_attrs,
};
static const struct attribute_group *w1_f29_groups[] = {
&w1_f29_group,
NULL,
};
static struct w1_family_ops w1_f29_fops = {
.add_slave = w1_f29_disable_test_mode,
.groups = w1_f29_groups,
};
static struct w1_family w1_family_29 = {
.fid = W1_FAMILY_DS2408,
.fops = &w1_f29_fops,
};
module_w1_family(w1_family_29);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Jean-Francois Dagenais <dagenaisj@sonatest.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("w1 family 29 driver for DS2408 8 Pin IO");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_ALIAS("w1-family-" __stringify(W1_FAMILY_DS2408));