linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/base/power/domain.c

2381 lines
61 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* drivers/base/power/domain.c - Common code related to device power domains.
*
* Copyright (C) 2011 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, Renesas Electronics Corp.
*
* This file is released under the GPLv2.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/pm_clock.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#define GENPD_DEV_CALLBACK(genpd, type, callback, dev) \
({ \
type (*__routine)(struct device *__d); \
type __ret = (type)0; \
\
__routine = genpd->dev_ops.callback; \
if (__routine) { \
__ret = __routine(dev); \
} \
__ret; \
})
#define GENPD_DEV_TIMED_CALLBACK(genpd, type, callback, dev, field, name) \
({ \
ktime_t __start = ktime_get(); \
type __retval = GENPD_DEV_CALLBACK(genpd, type, callback, dev); \
s64 __elapsed = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), __start)); \
struct gpd_timing_data *__td = &dev_gpd_data(dev)->td; \
if (!__retval && __elapsed > __td->field) { \
__td->field = __elapsed; \
dev_dbg(dev, name " latency exceeded, new value %lld ns\n", \
__elapsed); \
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true; \
__td->constraint_changed = true; \
} \
__retval; \
})
static LIST_HEAD(gpd_list);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(gpd_list_lock);
static struct generic_pm_domain *pm_genpd_lookup_name(const char *domain_name)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = NULL, *gpd;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(domain_name))
return NULL;
mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) {
if (!strcmp(gpd->name, domain_name)) {
genpd = gpd;
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
return genpd;
}
struct generic_pm_domain *dev_to_genpd(struct device *dev)
{
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->pm_domain))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
return pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain);
}
static int genpd_stop_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
{
return GENPD_DEV_TIMED_CALLBACK(genpd, int, stop, dev,
stop_latency_ns, "stop");
}
static int genpd_start_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
{
return GENPD_DEV_TIMED_CALLBACK(genpd, int, start, dev,
start_latency_ns, "start");
}
static bool genpd_sd_counter_dec(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
bool ret = false;
if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) == 0))
ret = !!atomic_dec_and_test(&genpd->sd_count);
return ret;
}
static void genpd_sd_counter_inc(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
atomic_inc(&genpd->sd_count);
smp_mb__after_atomic();
}
static void genpd_acquire_lock(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
/*
* Wait for the domain to transition into either the active,
* or the power off state.
*/
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&genpd->status_wait_queue, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
if (genpd->status == GPD_STATE_ACTIVE
|| genpd->status == GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF)
break;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
schedule();
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
}
finish_wait(&genpd->status_wait_queue, &wait);
}
static void genpd_release_lock(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
}
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
static void genpd_set_active(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
if (genpd->resume_count == 0)
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_ACTIVE;
}
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
static void genpd_recalc_cpu_exit_latency(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
s64 usecs64;
if (!genpd->cpuidle_data)
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
return;
usecs64 = genpd->power_on_latency_ns;
do_div(usecs64, NSEC_PER_USEC);
usecs64 += genpd->cpuidle_data->saved_exit_latency;
genpd->cpuidle_data->idle_state->exit_latency = usecs64;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
}
static int genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
ktime_t time_start;
s64 elapsed_ns;
int ret;
if (!genpd->power_on)
return 0;
time_start = ktime_get();
ret = genpd->power_on(genpd);
if (ret)
return ret;
elapsed_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), time_start));
if (elapsed_ns <= genpd->power_on_latency_ns)
return ret;
genpd->power_on_latency_ns = elapsed_ns;
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
genpd_recalc_cpu_exit_latency(genpd);
pr_warn("%s: Power-%s latency exceeded, new value %lld ns\n",
genpd->name, "on", elapsed_ns);
return ret;
}
static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
ktime_t time_start;
s64 elapsed_ns;
int ret;
if (!genpd->power_off)
return 0;
time_start = ktime_get();
ret = genpd->power_off(genpd);
if (ret == -EBUSY)
return ret;
elapsed_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), time_start));
if (elapsed_ns <= genpd->power_off_latency_ns)
return ret;
genpd->power_off_latency_ns = elapsed_ns;
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
pr_warn("%s: Power-%s latency exceeded, new value %lld ns\n",
genpd->name, "off", elapsed_ns);
return ret;
}
/**
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* __pm_genpd_poweron - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power up.
*
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* Restore power to @genpd and all of its masters so that it is possible to
* resume a device belonging to it.
*/
static int __pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
__releases(&genpd->lock) __acquires(&genpd->lock)
{
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
struct gpd_link *link;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
int ret = 0;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
/* If the domain's master is being waited for, we have to wait too. */
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&genpd->status_wait_queue, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (genpd->status != GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER)
break;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
schedule();
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
}
finish_wait(&genpd->status_wait_queue, &wait);
if (genpd->status == GPD_STATE_ACTIVE
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
|| (genpd->prepared_count > 0 && genpd->suspend_power_off))
return 0;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
if (genpd->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF) {
genpd_set_active(genpd);
return 0;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
}
if (genpd->cpuidle_data) {
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
cpuidle_pause_and_lock();
genpd->cpuidle_data->idle_state->disabled = true;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
goto out;
}
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
/*
* The list is guaranteed not to change while the loop below is being
* executed, unless one of the masters' .power_on() callbacks fiddles
* with it.
*/
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
genpd_sd_counter_inc(link->master);
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
ret = pm_genpd_poweron(link->master);
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
/*
* The "wait for parent" status is guaranteed not to change
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* while the master is powering on.
*/
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
wake_up_all(&genpd->status_wait_queue);
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
if (ret) {
genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
goto err;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
}
}
ret = genpd_power_on(genpd);
if (ret)
goto err;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
out:
genpd_set_active(genpd);
return 0;
err:
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node)
genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
return ret;
}
/**
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* pm_genpd_poweron - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power up.
*/
int pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
int ret;
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
ret = __pm_genpd_poweron(genpd);
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
return ret;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_name_poweron - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
* @domain_name: Name of the PM domain to power up.
*/
int pm_genpd_name_poweron(const char *domain_name)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
genpd = pm_genpd_lookup_name(domain_name);
return genpd ? pm_genpd_poweron(genpd) : -EINVAL;
}
static int genpd_start_dev_no_timing(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
struct device *dev)
{
return GENPD_DEV_CALLBACK(genpd, int, start, dev);
}
static int genpd_save_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
{
return GENPD_DEV_TIMED_CALLBACK(genpd, int, save_state, dev,
save_state_latency_ns, "state save");
}
static int genpd_restore_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
{
return GENPD_DEV_TIMED_CALLBACK(genpd, int, restore_state, dev,
restore_state_latency_ns,
"state restore");
}
static int genpd_dev_pm_qos_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long val, void *ptr)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
struct device *dev;
gpd_data = container_of(nb, struct generic_pm_domain_data, nb);
mutex_lock(&gpd_data->lock);
dev = gpd_data->base.dev;
if (!dev) {
mutex_unlock(&gpd_data->lock);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
mutex_unlock(&gpd_data->lock);
for (;;) {
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
pdd = dev->power.subsys_data ?
dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data : NULL;
if (pdd && pdd->dev) {
to_gpd_data(pdd)->td.constraint_changed = true;
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
} else {
genpd = ERR_PTR(-ENODATA);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
if (!IS_ERR(genpd)) {
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
}
dev = dev->parent;
if (!dev || dev->power.ignore_children)
break;
}
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
/**
* __pm_genpd_save_device - Save the pre-suspend state of a device.
* @pdd: Domain data of the device to save the state of.
* @genpd: PM domain the device belongs to.
*/
static int __pm_genpd_save_device(struct pm_domain_data *pdd,
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
__releases(&genpd->lock) __acquires(&genpd->lock)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
struct device *dev = pdd->dev;
int ret = 0;
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
if (gpd_data->need_restore > 0)
return 0;
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
/*
* If the value of the need_restore flag is still unknown at this point,
* we trust that pm_genpd_poweroff() has verified that the device is
* already runtime PM suspended.
*/
if (gpd_data->need_restore < 0) {
gpd_data->need_restore = 1;
return 0;
}
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
ret = genpd_save_dev(genpd, dev);
genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
if (!ret)
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
gpd_data->need_restore = 1;
return ret;
}
/**
* __pm_genpd_restore_device - Restore the pre-suspend state of a device.
* @pdd: Domain data of the device to restore the state of.
* @genpd: PM domain the device belongs to.
*/
static void __pm_genpd_restore_device(struct pm_domain_data *pdd,
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
__releases(&genpd->lock) __acquires(&genpd->lock)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
struct device *dev = pdd->dev;
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
int need_restore = gpd_data->need_restore;
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
gpd_data->need_restore = 0;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
/*
* Call genpd_restore_dev() for recently added devices too (need_restore
* is negative then).
*/
if (need_restore)
genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
}
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
/**
* genpd_abort_poweroff - Check if a PM domain power off should be aborted.
* @genpd: PM domain to check.
*
* Return true if a PM domain's status changed to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE during
* a "power off" operation, which means that a "power on" has occured in the
* meantime, or if its resume_count field is different from zero, which means
* that one of its devices has been resumed in the meantime.
*/
static bool genpd_abort_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
return genpd->status == GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER
|| genpd->status == GPD_STATE_ACTIVE || genpd->resume_count > 0;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
}
/**
* genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff().
* @genpd: PM domait to power off.
*
* Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff() unless it's already been done
* before.
*/
static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
queue_work(pm_wq, &genpd->power_off_work);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_poweroff - Remove power from a given PM domain.
* @genpd: PM domain to power down.
*
* If all of the @genpd's devices have been suspended and all of its subdomains
* have been powered down, run the runtime suspend callbacks provided by all of
* the @genpd's devices' drivers and remove power from @genpd.
*/
static int pm_genpd_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
__releases(&genpd->lock) __acquires(&genpd->lock)
{
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
struct gpd_link *link;
unsigned int not_suspended;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
int ret = 0;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
start:
/*
* Do not try to power off the domain in the following situations:
* (1) The domain is already in the "power off" state.
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* (2) The domain is waiting for its master to power up.
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
* (3) One of the domain's devices is being resumed right now.
* (4) System suspend is in progress.
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
*/
if (genpd->status == GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF
|| genpd->status == GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER
|| genpd->resume_count > 0 || genpd->prepared_count > 0)
return 0;
if (atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0)
return -EBUSY;
not_suspended = 0;
list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
enum pm_qos_flags_status stat;
stat = dev_pm_qos_flags(pdd->dev,
PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF
| PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP);
if (stat > PM_QOS_FLAGS_NONE)
return -EBUSY;
if (pdd->dev->driver && (!pm_runtime_suspended(pdd->dev)
|| pdd->dev->power.irq_safe))
not_suspended++;
}
if (not_suspended > genpd->in_progress)
return -EBUSY;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
if (genpd->poweroff_task) {
/*
* Another instance of pm_genpd_poweroff() is executing
* callbacks, so tell it to start over and return.
*/
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_REPEAT;
return 0;
}
if (genpd->gov && genpd->gov->power_down_ok) {
if (!genpd->gov->power_down_ok(&genpd->domain))
return -EAGAIN;
}
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_BUSY;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
genpd->poweroff_task = current;
list_for_each_entry_reverse(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
ret = atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) == 0 ?
__pm_genpd_save_device(pdd, genpd) : -EBUSY;
if (genpd_abort_poweroff(genpd))
goto out;
if (ret) {
genpd_set_active(genpd);
goto out;
}
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
if (genpd->status == GPD_STATE_REPEAT) {
genpd->poweroff_task = NULL;
goto start;
}
}
if (genpd->cpuidle_data) {
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
/*
* If cpuidle_data is set, cpuidle should turn the domain off
* when the CPU in it is idle. In that case we don't decrement
* the subdomain counts of the master domains, so that power is
* not removed from the current domain prematurely as a result
* of cutting off the masters' power.
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
*/
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
cpuidle_pause_and_lock();
genpd->cpuidle_data->idle_state->disabled = false;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
goto out;
}
if (genpd->power_off) {
if (atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0) {
ret = -EBUSY;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
goto out;
}
/*
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* If sd_count > 0 at this point, one of the subdomains hasn't
* managed to call pm_genpd_poweron() for the master yet after
* incrementing it. In that case pm_genpd_poweron() will wait
* for us to drop the lock, so we can call .power_off() and let
* the pm_genpd_poweron() restore power for us (this shouldn't
* happen very often).
*/
ret = genpd_power_off(genpd);
if (ret == -EBUSY) {
genpd_set_active(genpd);
goto out;
}
}
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
genpd_queue_power_off_work(link->master);
}
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
out:
genpd->poweroff_task = NULL;
wake_up_all(&genpd->status_wait_queue);
return ret;
}
/**
* genpd_power_off_work_fn - Power off PM domain whose subdomain count is 0.
* @work: Work structure used for scheduling the execution of this function.
*/
static void genpd_power_off_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
genpd = container_of(work, struct generic_pm_domain, power_off_work);
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
pm_genpd_poweroff(genpd);
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_runtime_suspend - Suspend a device belonging to I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to suspend.
*
* Carry out a runtime suspend of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a PM domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
bool (*stop_ok)(struct device *__dev);
int ret;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
stop_ok = genpd->gov ? genpd->gov->stop_ok : NULL;
if (stop_ok && !stop_ok(dev))
return -EBUSY;
ret = genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
/*
* If power.irq_safe is set, this routine will be run with interrupts
* off, so it can't use mutexes.
*/
if (dev->power.irq_safe)
return 0;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
/*
* If we have an unknown state of the need_restore flag, it means none
* of the runtime PM callbacks has been invoked yet. Let's update the
* flag to reflect that the current state is active.
*/
gpd_data = to_gpd_data(dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data);
if (gpd_data->need_restore < 0)
gpd_data->need_restore = 0;
genpd->in_progress++;
pm_genpd_poweroff(genpd);
genpd->in_progress--;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
return 0;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_runtime_resume - Resume a device belonging to I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to resume.
*
* Carry out a runtime resume of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a PM domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
int ret;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
/* If power.irq_safe, the PM domain is never powered off. */
if (dev->power.irq_safe)
return genpd_start_dev_no_timing(genpd, dev);
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
ret = __pm_genpd_poweron(genpd);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
return ret;
}
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_BUSY;
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
genpd->resume_count++;
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&genpd->status_wait_queue, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
/*
* If current is the powering off task, we have been called
* reentrantly from one of the device callbacks, so we should
* not wait.
*/
if (!genpd->poweroff_task || genpd->poweroff_task == current)
break;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
schedule();
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
}
finish_wait(&genpd->status_wait_queue, &wait);
__pm_genpd_restore_device(dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data, genpd);
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
genpd->resume_count--;
genpd_set_active(genpd);
wake_up_all(&genpd->status_wait_queue);
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
return 0;
}
static bool pd_ignore_unused;
static int __init pd_ignore_unused_setup(char *__unused)
{
pd_ignore_unused = true;
return 1;
}
__setup("pd_ignore_unused", pd_ignore_unused_setup);
/**
* pm_genpd_poweroff_unused - Power off all PM domains with no devices in use.
*/
void pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(void)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
if (pd_ignore_unused) {
pr_warn("genpd: Not disabling unused power domains\n");
return;
}
mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(genpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node)
genpd_queue_power_off_work(genpd);
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
}
static int __init genpd_poweroff_unused(void)
{
pm_genpd_poweroff_unused();
return 0;
}
late_initcall(genpd_poweroff_unused);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
/**
* pm_genpd_present - Check if the given PM domain has been initialized.
* @genpd: PM domain to check.
*/
static bool pm_genpd_present(const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
const struct generic_pm_domain *gpd;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd))
return false;
list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node)
if (gpd == genpd)
return true;
return false;
}
static bool genpd_dev_active_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
struct device *dev)
{
return GENPD_DEV_CALLBACK(genpd, bool, active_wakeup, dev);
}
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
/**
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* pm_genpd_sync_poweroff - Synchronously power off a PM domain and its masters.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @genpd: PM domain to power off, if possible.
*
* Check if the given PM domain can be powered off (during system suspend or
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* hibernation) and do that if so. Also, in that case propagate to its masters.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*
* This function is only called in "noirq" and "syscore" stages of system power
* transitions, so it need not acquire locks (all of the "noirq" callbacks are
* executed sequentially, so it is guaranteed that it will never run twice in
* parallel).
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*/
static void pm_genpd_sync_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
struct gpd_link *link;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
if (genpd->status == GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF)
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
return;
if (genpd->suspended_count != genpd->device_count
|| atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0)
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
return;
genpd_power_off(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
pm_genpd_sync_poweroff(link->master);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
}
/**
* pm_genpd_sync_poweron - Synchronously power on a PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power on.
*
* This function is only called in "noirq" and "syscore" stages of system power
* transitions, so it need not acquire locks (all of the "noirq" callbacks are
* executed sequentially, so it is guaranteed that it will never run twice in
* parallel).
*/
static void pm_genpd_sync_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
if (genpd->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF)
return;
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
pm_genpd_sync_poweron(link->master);
genpd_sd_counter_inc(link->master);
}
genpd_power_on(genpd);
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_ACTIVE;
}
/**
* resume_needed - Check whether to resume a device before system suspend.
* @dev: Device to check.
* @genpd: PM domain the device belongs to.
*
* There are two cases in which a device that can wake up the system from sleep
* states should be resumed by pm_genpd_prepare(): (1) if the device is enabled
* to wake up the system and it has to remain active for this purpose while the
* system is in the sleep state and (2) if the device is not enabled to wake up
* the system from sleep states and it generally doesn't generate wakeup signals
* by itself (those signals are generated on its behalf by other parts of the
* system). In the latter case it may be necessary to reconfigure the device's
* wakeup settings during system suspend, because it may have been set up to
* signal remote wakeup from the system's working state as needed by runtime PM.
* Return 'true' in either of the above cases.
*/
static bool resume_needed(struct device *dev, struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
bool active_wakeup;
if (!device_can_wakeup(dev))
return false;
active_wakeup = genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev);
return device_may_wakeup(dev) ? active_wakeup : !active_wakeup;
}
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
/**
* pm_genpd_prepare - Start power transition of a device in a PM domain.
* @dev: Device to start the transition of.
*
* Start a power transition of a device (during a system-wide power transition)
* under the assumption that its pm_domain field points to the domain member of
* an object of type struct generic_pm_domain representing a PM domain
* consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_prepare(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
int ret;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* If a wakeup request is pending for the device, it should be woken up
* at this point and a system wakeup event should be reported if it's
* set up to wake up the system from sleep states.
*/
pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
if (pm_runtime_barrier(dev) && device_may_wakeup(dev))
pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
pm_runtime_put(dev);
return -EBUSY;
}
if (resume_needed(dev, genpd))
pm_runtime_resume(dev);
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
if (genpd->prepared_count++ == 0) {
genpd->suspended_count = 0;
genpd->suspend_power_off = genpd->status == GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
}
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
if (genpd->suspend_power_off) {
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
return 0;
}
/*
* The PM domain must be in the GPD_STATE_ACTIVE state at this point,
* so pm_genpd_poweron() will return immediately, but if the device
* is suspended (e.g. it's been stopped by genpd_stop_dev()), we need
* to make it operational.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*/
pm_runtime_resume(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
__pm_runtime_disable(dev, false);
ret = pm_generic_prepare(dev);
if (ret) {
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
if (--genpd->prepared_count == 0)
genpd->suspend_power_off = false;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
}
pm_runtime_put(dev);
return ret;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_suspend - Suspend a device belonging to an I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to suspend.
*
* Suspend a device under the assumption that its pm_domain field points to the
* domain member of an object of type struct generic_pm_domain representing
* a PM domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_suspend(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_suspend_late - Late suspend of a device from an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to suspend.
*
* Carry out a late suspend of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a PM domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_suspend_late(dev);
}
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
/**
* pm_genpd_suspend_noirq - Completion of suspend of device in an I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to suspend.
*
* Stop the device and remove power from the domain if all devices in it have
* been stopped.
*/
static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
if (genpd->suspend_power_off
|| (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev)))
return 0;
genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
/*
* Since all of the "noirq" callbacks are executed sequentially, it is
* guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
* the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
*/
genpd->suspended_count++;
pm_genpd_sync_poweroff(genpd);
return 0;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_resume_noirq - Start of resume of device in an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to resume.
*
* Restore power to the device's PM domain, if necessary, and start the device.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*/
static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
if (genpd->suspend_power_off
|| (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev)))
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
return 0;
/*
* Since all of the "noirq" callbacks are executed sequentially, it is
* guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
* the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
*/
pm_genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->suspended_count--;
return genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_resume_early - Early resume of a device in an I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to resume.
*
* Carry out an early resume of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a power domain consisting of I/O
* devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_resume_early(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_resume_early(dev);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_resume - Resume of device in an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to resume.
*
* Resume a device under the assumption that its pm_domain field points to the
* domain member of an object of type struct generic_pm_domain representing
* a power domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_resume(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_freeze - Freezing a device in an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to freeze.
*
* Freeze a device under the assumption that its pm_domain field points to the
* domain member of an object of type struct generic_pm_domain representing
* a power domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_freeze(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_freeze(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_freeze_late - Late freeze of a device in an I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to freeze.
*
* Carry out a late freeze of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a power domain consisting of I/O
* devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_freeze_late(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_freeze_late(dev);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_freeze_noirq - Completion of freezing a device in an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to freeze.
*
* Carry out a late freeze of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a power domain consisting of I/O
* devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_freeze_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
}
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
/**
* pm_genpd_thaw_noirq - Early thaw of device in an I/O PM domain.
* @dev: Device to thaw.
*
* Start the device, unless power has been removed from the domain already
* before the system transition.
*/
static int pm_genpd_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_thaw_early - Early thaw of device in an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to thaw.
*
* Carry out an early thaw of a device under the assumption that its
* pm_domain field points to the domain member of an object of type
* struct generic_pm_domain representing a power domain consisting of I/O
* devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_thaw_early(struct device *dev)
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_thaw_early(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_thaw - Thaw a device belonging to an I/O power domain.
* @dev: Device to thaw.
*
* Thaw a device under the assumption that its pm_domain field points to the
* domain member of an object of type struct generic_pm_domain representing
* a power domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static int pm_genpd_thaw(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
return genpd->suspend_power_off ? 0 : pm_generic_thaw(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_restore_noirq - Start of restore of device in an I/O PM domain.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
* @dev: Device to resume.
*
* Make sure the domain will be in the same power state as before the
* hibernation the system is resuming from and start the device if necessary.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*/
static int pm_genpd_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Since all of the "noirq" callbacks are executed sequentially, it is
* guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
* the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
*
* At this point suspended_count == 0 means we are being run for the
* first time for the given domain in the present cycle.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*/
if (genpd->suspended_count++ == 0) {
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
/*
* The boot kernel might put the domain into arbitrary state,
* so make it appear as powered off to pm_genpd_sync_poweron(),
* so that it tries to power it on in case it was really off.
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
*/
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
if (genpd->suspend_power_off) {
/*
* If the domain was off before the hibernation, make
* sure it will be off going forward.
*/
genpd_power_off(genpd);
return 0;
}
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
if (genpd->suspend_power_off)
return 0;
pm_genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
return genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
/**
* pm_genpd_complete - Complete power transition of a device in a power domain.
* @dev: Device to complete the transition of.
*
* Complete a power transition of a device (during a system-wide power
* transition) under the assumption that its pm_domain field points to the
* domain member of an object of type struct generic_pm_domain representing
* a power domain consisting of I/O devices.
*/
static void pm_genpd_complete(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
bool run_complete;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return;
mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
run_complete = !genpd->suspend_power_off;
if (--genpd->prepared_count == 0)
genpd->suspend_power_off = false;
mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
if (run_complete) {
pm_generic_complete(dev);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
pm_request_idle(dev);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
}
}
/**
* genpd_syscore_switch - Switch power during system core suspend or resume.
* @dev: Device that normally is marked as "always on" to switch power for.
*
* This routine may only be called during the system core (syscore) suspend or
* resume phase for devices whose "always on" flags are set.
*/
static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd))
return;
if (suspend) {
genpd->suspended_count++;
pm_genpd_sync_poweroff(genpd);
} else {
pm_genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
genpd->suspended_count--;
}
}
void pm_genpd_syscore_poweroff(struct device *dev)
{
genpd_syscore_switch(dev, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_syscore_poweroff);
void pm_genpd_syscore_poweron(struct device *dev)
{
genpd_syscore_switch(dev, false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_syscore_poweron);
#else /* !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
#define pm_genpd_prepare NULL
#define pm_genpd_suspend NULL
#define pm_genpd_suspend_late NULL
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
#define pm_genpd_suspend_noirq NULL
#define pm_genpd_resume_early NULL
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
#define pm_genpd_resume_noirq NULL
#define pm_genpd_resume NULL
#define pm_genpd_freeze NULL
#define pm_genpd_freeze_late NULL
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
#define pm_genpd_freeze_noirq NULL
#define pm_genpd_thaw_early NULL
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
#define pm_genpd_thaw_noirq NULL
#define pm_genpd_thaw NULL
#define pm_genpd_restore_noirq NULL
#define pm_genpd_complete NULL
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
static struct generic_pm_domain_data *__pm_genpd_alloc_dev_data(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
gpd_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*gpd_data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!gpd_data)
return NULL;
mutex_init(&gpd_data->lock);
gpd_data->nb.notifier_call = genpd_dev_pm_qos_notifier;
dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(dev, &gpd_data->nb);
return gpd_data;
}
static void __pm_genpd_free_dev_data(struct device *dev,
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data)
{
dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &gpd_data->nb);
kfree(gpd_data);
}
/**
* __pm_genpd_add_device - Add a device to an I/O PM domain.
* @genpd: PM domain to add the device to.
* @dev: Device to be added.
* @td: Set of PM QoS timing parameters to attach to the device.
*/
int __pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
struct gpd_timing_data *td)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data_new, *gpd_data = NULL;
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
int ret = 0;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
return -EINVAL;
gpd_data_new = __pm_genpd_alloc_dev_data(dev);
if (!gpd_data_new)
return -ENOMEM;
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
if (genpd->prepared_count > 0) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node)
if (pdd->dev == dev) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
ret = dev_pm_get_subsys_data(dev);
if (ret)
goto out;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->device_count++;
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
dev->pm_domain = &genpd->domain;
if (dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data) {
gpd_data = to_gpd_data(dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data);
} else {
gpd_data = gpd_data_new;
dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data = &gpd_data->base;
}
gpd_data->refcount++;
if (td)
gpd_data->td = *td;
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
if (genpd->attach_dev)
genpd->attach_dev(genpd, dev);
mutex_lock(&gpd_data->lock);
gpd_data->base.dev = dev;
list_add_tail(&gpd_data->base.list_node, &genpd->dev_list);
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
gpd_data->need_restore = -1;
gpd_data->td.constraint_changed = true;
gpd_data->td.effective_constraint_ns = -1;
mutex_unlock(&gpd_data->lock);
out:
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
if (gpd_data != gpd_data_new)
__pm_genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data_new);
return ret;
}
/**
* __pm_genpd_name_add_device - Find I/O PM domain and add a device to it.
* @domain_name: Name of the PM domain to add the device to.
* @dev: Device to be added.
* @td: Set of PM QoS timing parameters to attach to the device.
*/
int __pm_genpd_name_add_device(const char *domain_name, struct device *dev,
struct gpd_timing_data *td)
{
return __pm_genpd_add_device(pm_genpd_lookup_name(domain_name), dev, td);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_remove_device - Remove a device from an I/O PM domain.
* @genpd: PM domain to remove the device from.
* @dev: Device to be removed.
*/
int pm_genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
bool remove = false;
int ret = 0;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)
|| IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->pm_domain)
|| pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain) != genpd)
return -EINVAL;
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
if (genpd->prepared_count > 0) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
genpd->device_count--;
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
if (genpd->detach_dev)
genpd->detach_dev(genpd, dev);
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
dev->pm_domain = NULL;
pdd = dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data;
list_del_init(&pdd->list_node);
gpd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
if (--gpd_data->refcount == 0) {
dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data = NULL;
remove = true;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
mutex_lock(&gpd_data->lock);
pdd->dev = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&gpd_data->lock);
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
dev_pm_put_subsys_data(dev);
if (remove)
__pm_genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data);
return 0;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
out:
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
return ret;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_dev_need_restore - Set/unset the device's "need restore" flag.
* @dev: Device to set/unset the flag for.
* @val: The new value of the device's "need restore" flag.
*/
void pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(struct device *dev, bool val)
{
struct pm_subsys_data *psd;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->power.lock, flags);
psd = dev_to_psd(dev);
if (psd && psd->domain_data)
PM / Domains: Fix initial default state of the need_restore flag The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain. The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to update the need_restore flag to somewhat cope with such scenarios. Typically that should have been done from drivers/buses ->probe() since it's those that put the requirements on the value of the need_restore flag. Until recently, the Exynos SOCs were the only user of the pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API, though invoking it from a centralized location while adding devices to their PM domains. Due to that Exynos now have swithed to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, it's no longer possible to invoke the API from a centralized location. The reason is because devices are now added to their PM domains during the probe sequence. Commit "ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings" did the switch for Exynos to the generic OF-based PM domain look-up, but it also removed the call to pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(). This caused a regression for some of the Exynos drivers. To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets invoked, update the initial value accordingly. Moreover, since the generic PM domain is verifying that all devices are both runtime PM enabled and suspended, using pm_runtime_suspended() while pm_genpd_poweroff() is invoked from the scheduled work, we can be sure of that the PM domain won't be powering off while having active devices. Do note that, the generic PM domain can still only know about active devices which has been activated through invoking its runtime PM resume callback. In other words, buses/drivers using pm_runtime_set_active() during ->probe() will still suffer from a race condition, potentially probing a device without having its PM domain being powered. That issue will have to be solved using a different approach. This a log from the boot regression for Exynos5, which is being fixed in this patch. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 308 at ../drivers/clk/clk.c:851 clk_disable+0x24/0x30() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 308 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-00569-gbd9449f-dirty #10 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work [<c0013c64>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0010dec>] (show_stack) from [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc) [<c03ee4cc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x88) [<c0020d34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c0020d74>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) [<c03107b0>] (clk_disable) from [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend+0x128/0x160) [<c02cc834>] (gsc_runtime_suspend) from [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x38) [<c0249024>] (pm_generic_runtime_suspend) from [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state+0x2c/0x8c) [<c024f44c>] (pm_genpd_default_save_state) from [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff+0x224/0x3ec) [<c024ff2c>] (pm_genpd_poweroff) from [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend+0x9c/0xcc) [<c02501b4>] (pm_genpd_runtime_suspend) from [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) [<c024a4f8>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74) [<c024a54c>] (rpm_callback) from [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend+0xd4/0x43c) [<c024a930>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work+0x80/0x90) [<c024bbcc>] (pm_runtime_work) from [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work+0x12c/0x314) [<c0032a9c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x4b0) [<c0032cf4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003747c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8) [<c003747c>] (kthread) from [<c000e738>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) ---[ end trace 40cd58bcd6988f12 ]--- Fixes: a4a8c2c4962bb655 (ARM: exynos: Move to generic PM domain DT bindings) Reported-and-tested0by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11 17:07:08 +07:00
to_gpd_data(psd->domain_data)->need_restore = val ? 1 : 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_dev_need_restore);
/**
* pm_genpd_add_subdomain - Add a subdomain to an I/O PM domain.
* @genpd: Master PM domain to add the subdomain to.
* @subdomain: Subdomain to be added.
*/
int pm_genpd_add_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
struct generic_pm_domain *subdomain)
{
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
struct gpd_link *link;
int ret = 0;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(subdomain)
|| genpd == subdomain)
return -EINVAL;
start:
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
mutex_lock_nested(&subdomain->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
if (subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF
&& subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_ACTIVE) {
mutex_unlock(&subdomain->lock);
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
goto start;
}
if (genpd->status == GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF
&& subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->master_links, master_node) {
if (link->slave == subdomain && link->master == genpd) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
}
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
link = kzalloc(sizeof(*link), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!link) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
link->master = genpd;
list_add_tail(&link->master_node, &genpd->master_links);
link->slave = subdomain;
list_add_tail(&link->slave_node, &subdomain->slave_links);
if (subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF)
genpd_sd_counter_inc(genpd);
out:
mutex_unlock(&subdomain->lock);
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
return ret;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_add_subdomain_names - Add a subdomain to an I/O PM domain.
* @master_name: Name of the master PM domain to add the subdomain to.
* @subdomain_name: Name of the subdomain to be added.
*/
int pm_genpd_add_subdomain_names(const char *master_name,
const char *subdomain_name)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *master = NULL, *subdomain = NULL, *gpd;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(master_name) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(subdomain_name))
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) {
if (!master && !strcmp(gpd->name, master_name))
master = gpd;
if (!subdomain && !strcmp(gpd->name, subdomain_name))
subdomain = gpd;
if (master && subdomain)
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
return pm_genpd_add_subdomain(master, subdomain);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_remove_subdomain - Remove a subdomain from an I/O PM domain.
* @genpd: Master PM domain to remove the subdomain from.
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
* @subdomain: Subdomain to be removed.
*/
int pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
struct generic_pm_domain *subdomain)
{
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
struct gpd_link *link;
int ret = -EINVAL;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(subdomain))
return -EINVAL;
start:
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->master_links, master_node) {
if (link->slave != subdomain)
continue;
mutex_lock_nested(&subdomain->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
if (subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF
&& subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_ACTIVE) {
mutex_unlock(&subdomain->lock);
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
goto start;
}
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
list_del(&link->master_node);
list_del(&link->slave_node);
kfree(link);
if (subdomain->status != GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF)
genpd_sd_counter_dec(genpd);
mutex_unlock(&subdomain->lock);
ret = 0;
break;
}
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
return ret;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_attach_cpuidle - Connect the given PM domain with cpuidle.
* @genpd: PM domain to be connected with cpuidle.
* @state: cpuidle state this domain can disable/enable.
*
* Make a PM domain behave as though it contained a CPU core, that is, instead
* of calling its power down routine it will enable the given cpuidle state so
* that the cpuidle subsystem can power it down (if possible and desirable).
*/
int pm_genpd_attach_cpuidle(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, int state)
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
{
struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_drv;
struct gpd_cpuidle_data *cpuidle_data;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
struct cpuidle_state *idle_state;
int ret = 0;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || state < 0)
return -EINVAL;
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
if (genpd->cpuidle_data) {
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
ret = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
cpuidle_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpuidle_data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cpuidle_data) {
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
cpuidle_drv = cpuidle_driver_ref();
if (!cpuidle_drv) {
ret = -ENODEV;
goto err_drv;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
}
if (cpuidle_drv->state_count <= state) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}
idle_state = &cpuidle_drv->states[state];
if (!idle_state->disabled) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto err;
}
cpuidle_data->idle_state = idle_state;
cpuidle_data->saved_exit_latency = idle_state->exit_latency;
genpd->cpuidle_data = cpuidle_data;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
genpd_recalc_cpu_exit_latency(genpd);
out:
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
return ret;
err:
cpuidle_driver_unref();
err_drv:
kfree(cpuidle_data);
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
goto out;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_name_attach_cpuidle - Find PM domain and connect cpuidle to it.
* @name: Name of the domain to connect to cpuidle.
* @state: cpuidle state this domain can manipulate.
*/
int pm_genpd_name_attach_cpuidle(const char *name, int state)
{
return pm_genpd_attach_cpuidle(pm_genpd_lookup_name(name), state);
}
/**
* pm_genpd_detach_cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle connection from a PM domain.
* @genpd: PM domain to remove the cpuidle connection from.
*
* Remove the cpuidle connection set up by pm_genpd_attach_cpuidle() from the
* given PM domain.
*/
int pm_genpd_detach_cpuidle(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
{
struct gpd_cpuidle_data *cpuidle_data;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
struct cpuidle_state *idle_state;
int ret = 0;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
genpd_acquire_lock(genpd);
cpuidle_data = genpd->cpuidle_data;
if (!cpuidle_data) {
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
ret = -ENODEV;
goto out;
}
idle_state = cpuidle_data->idle_state;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
if (!idle_state->disabled) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
idle_state->exit_latency = cpuidle_data->saved_exit_latency;
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
cpuidle_driver_unref();
genpd->cpuidle_data = NULL;
kfree(cpuidle_data);
PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle, v2 On some systems there are CPU cores located in the same power domains as I/O devices. Then, power can only be removed from the domain if all I/O devices in it are not in use and the CPU core is idle. Add preliminary support for that to the generic PM domains framework. First, the platform is expected to provide a cpuidle driver with one extra state designated for use with the generic PM domains code. This state should be initially disabled and its exit_latency value should be set to whatever time is needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it, not including the domain's power on latency. Its .enter() callback should point to a procedure that will remove power from the domain containing the CPU core at the end of the CPU power transition. The remaining characteristics of the extra cpuidle state, referred to as the "domain" cpuidle state below, (e.g. power usage, target residency) should be populated in accordance with the properties of the hardware. Next, the platform should execute genpd_attach_cpuidle() on the PM domain containing the CPU core. That will cause the generic PM domains framework to treat that domain in a special way such that: * When all devices in the domain have been suspended and it is about to be turned off, the states of the devices will be saved, but power will not be removed from the domain. Instead, the "domain" cpuidle state will be enabled so that power can be removed from the domain when the CPU core is idle and the state has been chosen as the target by the cpuidle governor. * When the first I/O device in the domain is resumed and __pm_genpd_poweron(() is called for the first time after power has been removed from the domain, the "domain" cpuidle state will be disabled to avoid subsequent surprise power removals via cpuidle. The effective exit_latency value of the "domain" cpuidle state depends on the time needed to bring up the CPU core itself after restoring power to it as well as on the power on latency of the domain containing the CPU core. Thus the "domain" cpuidle state's exit_latency has to be recomputed every time the domain's power on latency is updated, which may happen every time power is restored to the domain, if the measured power on latency is greater than the latency stored in the corresponding generic_pm_domain structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-07-04 00:07:42 +07:00
out:
genpd_release_lock(genpd);
return ret;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_name_detach_cpuidle - Find PM domain and disconnect cpuidle from it.
* @name: Name of the domain to disconnect cpuidle from.
*/
int pm_genpd_name_detach_cpuidle(const char *name)
{
return pm_genpd_detach_cpuidle(pm_genpd_lookup_name(name));
}
PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback routines (v2) The current generic PM domains code attempts to use the generic system suspend operations along with the domains' device stop/start routines, which requires device drivers to assume that their system suspend/resume (and hibernation/restore) callbacks will always be used with generic PM domains. However, in theory, the same hardware may be used in devices that don't belong to any PM domain, in which case it would be necessary to add "fake" PM domains to satisfy the above assumption. Also, the domain the hardware belongs to may not be handled with the help of the generic code. To allow device drivers that may be used along with the generic PM domains code of more flexibility, add new device callbacks, .suspend(), .suspend_late(), .resume_early(), .resume(), .freeze(), .freeze_late(), .thaw_early(), and .thaw(), that can be supplied by the drivers in addition to their "standard" system suspend and hibernation callbacks. These new callbacks, if defined, will be used by the generic PM domains code for the handling of system suspend and hibernation instead of the "standard" ones. This will allow drivers to be designed to work with generic PM domains as well as without them. For backwards compatibility, introduce default implementations of the new callbacks for PM domains that will execute pm_generic_suspend(), pm_generic_suspend_noirq(), pm_generic_resume_noirq(), pm_generic_resume(), pm_generic_freeze(), pm_generic_freeze_noirq(), pm_generic_thaw_noirq(), and pm_generic_thaw(), respectively, for the given device if its driver doesn't define those callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-11-27 19:11:51 +07:00
/* Default device callbacks for generic PM domains. */
/**
* pm_genpd_default_save_state - Default "save device state" for PM domains.
* @dev: Device to handle.
*/
static int pm_genpd_default_save_state(struct device *dev)
{
int (*cb)(struct device *__dev);
if (dev->type && dev->type->pm)
cb = dev->type->pm->runtime_suspend;
else if (dev->class && dev->class->pm)
cb = dev->class->pm->runtime_suspend;
else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm)
cb = dev->bus->pm->runtime_suspend;
else
cb = NULL;
if (!cb && dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
cb = dev->driver->pm->runtime_suspend;
return cb ? cb(dev) : 0;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_default_restore_state - Default PM domains "restore device state".
* @dev: Device to handle.
*/
static int pm_genpd_default_restore_state(struct device *dev)
{
int (*cb)(struct device *__dev);
if (dev->type && dev->type->pm)
cb = dev->type->pm->runtime_resume;
else if (dev->class && dev->class->pm)
cb = dev->class->pm->runtime_resume;
else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm)
cb = dev->bus->pm->runtime_resume;
else
cb = NULL;
if (!cb && dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
cb = dev->driver->pm->runtime_resume;
return cb ? cb(dev) : 0;
}
/**
* pm_genpd_init - Initialize a generic I/O PM domain object.
* @genpd: PM domain object to initialize.
* @gov: PM domain governor to associate with the domain (may be NULL).
* @is_off: Initial value of the domain's power_is_off field.
*/
void pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
struct dev_power_governor *gov, bool is_off)
{
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd))
return;
PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on). However, there is at least one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by introducing objects representing links between PM domains. The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off. Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and a list of links in which it is a slave. The first of these lists replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place of the parent pointer. Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links). This allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-09 04:43:40 +07:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&genpd->master_links);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&genpd->slave_links);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&genpd->dev_list);
mutex_init(&genpd->lock);
genpd->gov = gov;
INIT_WORK(&genpd->power_off_work, genpd_power_off_work_fn);
genpd->in_progress = 0;
atomic_set(&genpd->sd_count, 0);
genpd->status = is_off ? GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF : GPD_STATE_ACTIVE;
init_waitqueue_head(&genpd->status_wait_queue);
PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function. This happens, for example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain. A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is suspended at the moment). This, of course, is undesirable, so the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from happening. The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry about those cases. Still, it needs to prevent the other possible race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(), pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time. To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax synchronization rules so that: * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY. If it finds that the status is not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances). * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released the PM domain's lock. * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel. * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron() and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately after acquiring the lock. The counter of resuming devices is then decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY). This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume() callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume() invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see that there's nothing to do for it. Next, the PM domain's lock will be acquired without waiting for its status to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback will be executed. In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being resumed, so it will return immediately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-07-12 05:39:36 +07:00
genpd->poweroff_task = NULL;
genpd->resume_count = 0;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->device_count = 0;
genpd->max_off_time_ns = -1;
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
genpd->domain.ops.runtime_suspend = pm_genpd_runtime_suspend;
genpd->domain.ops.runtime_resume = pm_genpd_runtime_resume;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.prepare = pm_genpd_prepare;
genpd->domain.ops.suspend = pm_genpd_suspend;
genpd->domain.ops.suspend_late = pm_genpd_suspend_late;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.suspend_noirq = pm_genpd_suspend_noirq;
genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = pm_genpd_resume_noirq;
genpd->domain.ops.resume_early = pm_genpd_resume_early;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.resume = pm_genpd_resume;
genpd->domain.ops.freeze = pm_genpd_freeze;
genpd->domain.ops.freeze_late = pm_genpd_freeze_late;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.freeze_noirq = pm_genpd_freeze_noirq;
genpd->domain.ops.thaw_noirq = pm_genpd_thaw_noirq;
genpd->domain.ops.thaw_early = pm_genpd_thaw_early;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.thaw = pm_genpd_thaw;
PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback routines (v2) The current generic PM domains code attempts to use the generic system suspend operations along with the domains' device stop/start routines, which requires device drivers to assume that their system suspend/resume (and hibernation/restore) callbacks will always be used with generic PM domains. However, in theory, the same hardware may be used in devices that don't belong to any PM domain, in which case it would be necessary to add "fake" PM domains to satisfy the above assumption. Also, the domain the hardware belongs to may not be handled with the help of the generic code. To allow device drivers that may be used along with the generic PM domains code of more flexibility, add new device callbacks, .suspend(), .suspend_late(), .resume_early(), .resume(), .freeze(), .freeze_late(), .thaw_early(), and .thaw(), that can be supplied by the drivers in addition to their "standard" system suspend and hibernation callbacks. These new callbacks, if defined, will be used by the generic PM domains code for the handling of system suspend and hibernation instead of the "standard" ones. This will allow drivers to be designed to work with generic PM domains as well as without them. For backwards compatibility, introduce default implementations of the new callbacks for PM domains that will execute pm_generic_suspend(), pm_generic_suspend_noirq(), pm_generic_resume_noirq(), pm_generic_resume(), pm_generic_freeze(), pm_generic_freeze_noirq(), pm_generic_thaw_noirq(), and pm_generic_thaw(), respectively, for the given device if its driver doesn't define those callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-11-27 19:11:51 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.poweroff = pm_genpd_suspend;
genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_late = pm_genpd_suspend_late;
PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback routines (v2) The current generic PM domains code attempts to use the generic system suspend operations along with the domains' device stop/start routines, which requires device drivers to assume that their system suspend/resume (and hibernation/restore) callbacks will always be used with generic PM domains. However, in theory, the same hardware may be used in devices that don't belong to any PM domain, in which case it would be necessary to add "fake" PM domains to satisfy the above assumption. Also, the domain the hardware belongs to may not be handled with the help of the generic code. To allow device drivers that may be used along with the generic PM domains code of more flexibility, add new device callbacks, .suspend(), .suspend_late(), .resume_early(), .resume(), .freeze(), .freeze_late(), .thaw_early(), and .thaw(), that can be supplied by the drivers in addition to their "standard" system suspend and hibernation callbacks. These new callbacks, if defined, will be used by the generic PM domains code for the handling of system suspend and hibernation instead of the "standard" ones. This will allow drivers to be designed to work with generic PM domains as well as without them. For backwards compatibility, introduce default implementations of the new callbacks for PM domains that will execute pm_generic_suspend(), pm_generic_suspend_noirq(), pm_generic_resume_noirq(), pm_generic_resume(), pm_generic_freeze(), pm_generic_freeze_noirq(), pm_generic_thaw_noirq(), and pm_generic_thaw(), respectively, for the given device if its driver doesn't define those callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-11-27 19:11:51 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_suspend_noirq;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.restore_noirq = pm_genpd_restore_noirq;
genpd->domain.ops.restore_early = pm_genpd_resume_early;
PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback routines (v2) The current generic PM domains code attempts to use the generic system suspend operations along with the domains' device stop/start routines, which requires device drivers to assume that their system suspend/resume (and hibernation/restore) callbacks will always be used with generic PM domains. However, in theory, the same hardware may be used in devices that don't belong to any PM domain, in which case it would be necessary to add "fake" PM domains to satisfy the above assumption. Also, the domain the hardware belongs to may not be handled with the help of the generic code. To allow device drivers that may be used along with the generic PM domains code of more flexibility, add new device callbacks, .suspend(), .suspend_late(), .resume_early(), .resume(), .freeze(), .freeze_late(), .thaw_early(), and .thaw(), that can be supplied by the drivers in addition to their "standard" system suspend and hibernation callbacks. These new callbacks, if defined, will be used by the generic PM domains code for the handling of system suspend and hibernation instead of the "standard" ones. This will allow drivers to be designed to work with generic PM domains as well as without them. For backwards compatibility, introduce default implementations of the new callbacks for PM domains that will execute pm_generic_suspend(), pm_generic_suspend_noirq(), pm_generic_resume_noirq(), pm_generic_resume(), pm_generic_freeze(), pm_generic_freeze_noirq(), pm_generic_thaw_noirq(), and pm_generic_thaw(), respectively, for the given device if its driver doesn't define those callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-11-27 19:11:51 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.restore = pm_genpd_resume;
PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw, poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate. The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains that were powered down at run time (before the transition). For the other devices the action carried out depends on the type of the transition. During system suspend the power domain .suspend() callback executes pm_generic_suspend() for the device, while the PM domain .suspend_noirq() callback runs pm_generic_suspend_noirq() for it, stops it and eventually removes power from the PM domain it belongs to (after all devices in the domain have been stopped and its subdomains have been powered off). During system resume the PM domain .resume_noirq() callback restores power to the PM domain (when executed for it first time), starts the device and executes pm_generic_resume_noirq() for it, while the .resume() callback executes pm_generic_resume() for the device. Finally, the .complete() callback executes pm_runtime_idle() for the device which should put it back into the suspended state if its runtime PM usage count is equal to zero at that time. The actions carried out during hibernation and resume from it are analogous to the ones described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-02 03:13:19 +07:00
genpd->domain.ops.complete = pm_genpd_complete;
genpd->dev_ops.save_state = pm_genpd_default_save_state;
genpd->dev_ops.restore_state = pm_genpd_default_restore_state;
if (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK) {
genpd->dev_ops.stop = pm_clk_suspend;
genpd->dev_ops.start = pm_clk_resume;
}
mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
list_add(&genpd->gpd_list_node, &gpd_list);
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
/*
* Device Tree based PM domain providers.
*
* The code below implements generic device tree based PM domain providers that
* bind device tree nodes with generic PM domains registered in the system.
*
* Any driver that registers generic PM domains and needs to support binding of
* devices to these domains is supposed to register a PM domain provider, which
* maps a PM domain specifier retrieved from the device tree to a PM domain.
*
* Two simple mapping functions have been provided for convenience:
* - __of_genpd_xlate_simple() for 1:1 device tree node to PM domain mapping.
* - __of_genpd_xlate_onecell() for mapping of multiple PM domains per node by
* index.
*/
/**
* struct of_genpd_provider - PM domain provider registration structure
* @link: Entry in global list of PM domain providers
* @node: Pointer to device tree node of PM domain provider
* @xlate: Provider-specific xlate callback mapping a set of specifier cells
* into a PM domain.
* @data: context pointer to be passed into @xlate callback
*/
struct of_genpd_provider {
struct list_head link;
struct device_node *node;
genpd_xlate_t xlate;
void *data;
};
/* List of registered PM domain providers. */
static LIST_HEAD(of_genpd_providers);
/* Mutex to protect the list above. */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(of_genpd_mutex);
/**
* __of_genpd_xlate_simple() - Xlate function for direct node-domain mapping
* @genpdspec: OF phandle args to map into a PM domain
* @data: xlate function private data - pointer to struct generic_pm_domain
*
* This is a generic xlate function that can be used to model PM domains that
* have their own device tree nodes. The private data of xlate function needs
* to be a valid pointer to struct generic_pm_domain.
*/
struct generic_pm_domain *__of_genpd_xlate_simple(
struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
void *data)
{
if (genpdspec->args_count != 0)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
return data;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__of_genpd_xlate_simple);
/**
* __of_genpd_xlate_onecell() - Xlate function using a single index.
* @genpdspec: OF phandle args to map into a PM domain
* @data: xlate function private data - pointer to struct genpd_onecell_data
*
* This is a generic xlate function that can be used to model simple PM domain
* controllers that have one device tree node and provide multiple PM domains.
* A single cell is used as an index into an array of PM domains specified in
* the genpd_onecell_data struct when registering the provider.
*/
struct generic_pm_domain *__of_genpd_xlate_onecell(
struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
void *data)
{
struct genpd_onecell_data *genpd_data = data;
unsigned int idx = genpdspec->args[0];
if (genpdspec->args_count != 1)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (idx >= genpd_data->num_domains) {
pr_err("%s: invalid domain index %u\n", __func__, idx);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
if (!genpd_data->domains[idx])
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
return genpd_data->domains[idx];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__of_genpd_xlate_onecell);
/**
* __of_genpd_add_provider() - Register a PM domain provider for a node
* @np: Device node pointer associated with the PM domain provider.
* @xlate: Callback for decoding PM domain from phandle arguments.
* @data: Context pointer for @xlate callback.
*/
int __of_genpd_add_provider(struct device_node *np, genpd_xlate_t xlate,
void *data)
{
struct of_genpd_provider *cp;
cp = kzalloc(sizeof(*cp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cp)
return -ENOMEM;
cp->node = of_node_get(np);
cp->data = data;
cp->xlate = xlate;
mutex_lock(&of_genpd_mutex);
list_add(&cp->link, &of_genpd_providers);
mutex_unlock(&of_genpd_mutex);
pr_debug("Added domain provider from %s\n", np->full_name);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__of_genpd_add_provider);
/**
* of_genpd_del_provider() - Remove a previously registered PM domain provider
* @np: Device node pointer associated with the PM domain provider
*/
void of_genpd_del_provider(struct device_node *np)
{
struct of_genpd_provider *cp;
mutex_lock(&of_genpd_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(cp, &of_genpd_providers, link) {
if (cp->node == np) {
list_del(&cp->link);
of_node_put(cp->node);
kfree(cp);
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&of_genpd_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_del_provider);
/**
* of_genpd_get_from_provider() - Look-up PM domain
* @genpdspec: OF phandle args to use for look-up
*
* Looks for a PM domain provider under the node specified by @genpdspec and if
* found, uses xlate function of the provider to map phandle args to a PM
* domain.
*
* Returns a valid pointer to struct generic_pm_domain on success or ERR_PTR()
* on failure.
*/
struct generic_pm_domain *of_genpd_get_from_provider(
struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
struct of_genpd_provider *provider;
mutex_lock(&of_genpd_mutex);
/* Check if we have such a provider in our array */
list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_genpd_providers, link) {
if (provider->node == genpdspec->np)
genpd = provider->xlate(genpdspec, provider->data);
if (!IS_ERR(genpd))
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&of_genpd_mutex);
return genpd;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_get_from_provider);
/**
* genpd_dev_pm_detach - Detach a device from its PM domain.
* @dev: Device to attach.
* @power_off: Currently not used
*
* Try to locate a corresponding generic PM domain, which the device was
* attached to previously. If such is found, the device is detached from it.
*/
static void genpd_dev_pm_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *pd = NULL, *gpd;
int ret = 0;
if (!dev->pm_domain)
return;
mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) {
if (&gpd->domain == dev->pm_domain) {
pd = gpd;
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
if (!pd)
return;
dev_dbg(dev, "removing from PM domain %s\n", pd->name);
while (1) {
ret = pm_genpd_remove_device(pd, dev);
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
cond_resched();
}
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to remove from PM domain %s: %d",
pd->name, ret);
return;
}
/* Check if PM domain can be powered off after removing this device. */
genpd_queue_power_off_work(pd);
}
/**
* genpd_dev_pm_attach - Attach a device to its PM domain using DT.
* @dev: Device to attach.
*
* Parse device's OF node to find a PM domain specifier. If such is found,
* attaches the device to retrieved pm_domain ops.
*
* Both generic and legacy Samsung-specific DT bindings are supported to keep
* backwards compatibility with existing DTBs.
*
* Returns 0 on successfully attached PM domain or negative error code.
*/
int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
{
struct of_phandle_args pd_args;
struct generic_pm_domain *pd;
int ret;
if (!dev->of_node)
return -ENODEV;
if (dev->pm_domain)
return -EEXIST;
ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
"#power-domain-cells", 0, &pd_args);
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret != -ENOENT)
return ret;
/*
* Try legacy Samsung-specific bindings
* (for backwards compatibility of DT ABI)
*/
pd_args.args_count = 0;
pd_args.np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
"samsung,power-domain", 0);
if (!pd_args.np)
return -ENOENT;
}
pd = of_genpd_get_from_provider(&pd_args);
if (IS_ERR(pd)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "%s() failed to find PM domain: %ld\n",
__func__, PTR_ERR(pd));
of_node_put(dev->of_node);
return PTR_ERR(pd);
}
dev_dbg(dev, "adding to PM domain %s\n", pd->name);
while (1) {
ret = pm_genpd_add_device(pd, dev);
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
cond_resched();
}
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to add to PM domain %s: %d",
pd->name, ret);
of_node_put(dev->of_node);
return ret;
}
dev->pm_domain->detach = genpd_dev_pm_detach;
pm_genpd_poweron(pd);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genpd_dev_pm_attach);
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF */
PM / Domains: add debugfs listing of struct generic_pm_domain-s Add /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary file, which lists power domains in the system, their statuses and attached devices, resembling /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary. Currently it is impossible to inspect (from userland) whether a power domain is on or off. And, if it is on, which device blocks it from powering down. This change allows developers working on embedded devices power efficiency to list all necessary information about generic power domains in one place. The content of pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary file is generated by iterating over all generic power domain in the system, and, for each, over registered devices and over the subdomains, if present. Example output: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary domain status slaves /device runtime status ---------------------------------------------------------------------- a4su off a3sg off a3sm on a3sp on /devices/e6600000.pwm suspended /devices/e6c50000.serial active /devices/e6850000.sd suspended /devices/e6bd0000.mmc active a4s on a3sp, a3sm, a3sg /devices/e6900000.irqpin unsupported /devices/e6900004.irqpin unsupported /devices/e6900008.irqpin unsupported /devices/e690000c.irqpin unsupported /devices/e9a00000.ethernet active a3rv off a4r off a3rv /devices/fff20000.i2c suspended a4lc off c5 on a4lc, a4r, a4s, a4su /devices/e6050000.pfc unsupported /devices/e6138000.timer active To enable this feature, compile the kernel with debugfs and CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG enabled. Signed-off-by: Maciej Matraszek <m.matraszek@samsung.com> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-09-15 18:09:10 +07:00
/*** debugfs support ***/
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
static struct dentry *pm_genpd_debugfs_dir;
/*
* TODO: This function is a slightly modified version of rtpm_status_show
* from sysfs.c, so generalize it.
PM / Domains: add debugfs listing of struct generic_pm_domain-s Add /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary file, which lists power domains in the system, their statuses and attached devices, resembling /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary. Currently it is impossible to inspect (from userland) whether a power domain is on or off. And, if it is on, which device blocks it from powering down. This change allows developers working on embedded devices power efficiency to list all necessary information about generic power domains in one place. The content of pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary file is generated by iterating over all generic power domain in the system, and, for each, over registered devices and over the subdomains, if present. Example output: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary domain status slaves /device runtime status ---------------------------------------------------------------------- a4su off a3sg off a3sm on a3sp on /devices/e6600000.pwm suspended /devices/e6c50000.serial active /devices/e6850000.sd suspended /devices/e6bd0000.mmc active a4s on a3sp, a3sm, a3sg /devices/e6900000.irqpin unsupported /devices/e6900004.irqpin unsupported /devices/e6900008.irqpin unsupported /devices/e690000c.irqpin unsupported /devices/e9a00000.ethernet active a3rv off a4r off a3rv /devices/fff20000.i2c suspended a4lc off c5 on a4lc, a4r, a4s, a4su /devices/e6050000.pfc unsupported /devices/e6138000.timer active To enable this feature, compile the kernel with debugfs and CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG enabled. Signed-off-by: Maciej Matraszek <m.matraszek@samsung.com> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-09-15 18:09:10 +07:00
*/
static void rtpm_status_str(struct seq_file *s, struct device *dev)
{
static const char * const status_lookup[] = {
[RPM_ACTIVE] = "active",
[RPM_RESUMING] = "resuming",
[RPM_SUSPENDED] = "suspended",
[RPM_SUSPENDING] = "suspending"
};
const char *p = "";
if (dev->power.runtime_error)
p = "error";
else if (dev->power.disable_depth)
p = "unsupported";
else if (dev->power.runtime_status < ARRAY_SIZE(status_lookup))
p = status_lookup[dev->power.runtime_status];
else
WARN_ON(1);
seq_puts(s, p);
}
static int pm_genpd_summary_one(struct seq_file *s,
struct generic_pm_domain *gpd)
{
static const char * const status_lookup[] = {
[GPD_STATE_ACTIVE] = "on",
[GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER] = "wait-master",
[GPD_STATE_BUSY] = "busy",
[GPD_STATE_REPEAT] = "off-in-progress",
[GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF] = "off"
};
struct pm_domain_data *pm_data;
const char *kobj_path;
struct gpd_link *link;
int ret;
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&gpd->lock);
if (ret)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
if (WARN_ON(gpd->status >= ARRAY_SIZE(status_lookup)))
goto exit;
seq_printf(s, "%-30s %-15s ", gpd->name, status_lookup[gpd->status]);
/*
* Modifications on the list require holding locks on both
* master and slave, so we are safe.
* Also gpd->name is immutable.
*/
list_for_each_entry(link, &gpd->master_links, master_node) {
seq_printf(s, "%s", link->slave->name);
if (!list_is_last(&link->master_node, &gpd->master_links))
seq_puts(s, ", ");
}
list_for_each_entry(pm_data, &gpd->dev_list, list_node) {
kobj_path = kobject_get_path(&pm_data->dev->kobj, GFP_KERNEL);
if (kobj_path == NULL)
continue;
seq_printf(s, "\n %-50s ", kobj_path);
rtpm_status_str(s, pm_data->dev);
kfree(kobj_path);
}
seq_puts(s, "\n");
exit:
mutex_unlock(&gpd->lock);
return 0;
}
static int pm_genpd_summary_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *gpd;
int ret = 0;
seq_puts(s, " domain status slaves\n");
seq_puts(s, " /device runtime status\n");
seq_puts(s, "----------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&gpd_list_lock);
if (ret)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) {
ret = pm_genpd_summary_one(s, gpd);
if (ret)
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
return ret;
}
static int pm_genpd_summary_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return single_open(file, pm_genpd_summary_show, NULL);
}
static const struct file_operations pm_genpd_summary_fops = {
.open = pm_genpd_summary_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init pm_genpd_debug_init(void)
{
struct dentry *d;
pm_genpd_debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("pm_genpd", NULL);
if (!pm_genpd_debugfs_dir)
return -ENOMEM;
d = debugfs_create_file("pm_genpd_summary", S_IRUGO,
pm_genpd_debugfs_dir, NULL, &pm_genpd_summary_fops);
if (!d)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
late_initcall(pm_genpd_debug_init);
static void __exit pm_genpd_debug_exit(void)
{
debugfs_remove_recursive(pm_genpd_debugfs_dir);
}
__exitcall(pm_genpd_debug_exit);
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG */