linux_dsm_epyc7002/net/tipc/node.c

1230 lines
31 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* net/tipc/node.c: TIPC node management routines
*
* Copyright (c) 2000-2006, 2012-2015, Ericsson AB
* Copyright (c) 2005-2006, 2010-2014, Wind River Systems
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
*
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
* 3. Neither the names of the copyright holders nor the names of its
* contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
* this software without specific prior written permission.
*
* Alternatively, this software may be distributed under the terms of the
* GNU General Public License ("GPL") version 2 as published by the Free
* Software Foundation.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
* AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
* LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
* CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
* SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
* INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
* CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
* ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
* POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#include "core.h"
#include "link.h"
#include "node.h"
#include "name_distr.h"
#include "socket.h"
#include "bcast.h"
#include "discover.h"
/* Node FSM states and events:
*/
enum {
SELF_DOWN_PEER_DOWN = 0xdd,
SELF_UP_PEER_UP = 0xaa,
SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING = 0xd1,
SELF_UP_PEER_COMING = 0xac,
SELF_COMING_PEER_UP = 0xca,
SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN = 0x1d,
NODE_FAILINGOVER = 0xf0,
NODE_SYNCHING = 0xcc
};
enum {
SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT = 0xece,
SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT = 0x1ce,
PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT = 0x9ece,
PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT = 0x91ce,
NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT = 0xfbe,
NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT = 0xfee,
NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT = 0xcbe,
NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT = 0xcee
};
static void tipc_node_link_down(struct tipc_node *n, int bearer_id);
static void node_lost_contact(struct tipc_node *n_ptr);
static void node_established_contact(struct tipc_node *n_ptr);
static void tipc_node_delete(struct tipc_node *node);
static void tipc_node_timeout(unsigned long data);
static void tipc_node_fsm_evt(struct tipc_node *n, int evt);
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
struct tipc_sock_conn {
u32 port;
u32 peer_port;
u32 peer_node;
struct list_head list;
};
static const struct nla_policy tipc_nl_node_policy[TIPC_NLA_NODE_MAX + 1] = {
[TIPC_NLA_NODE_UNSPEC] = { .type = NLA_UNSPEC },
[TIPC_NLA_NODE_ADDR] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[TIPC_NLA_NODE_UP] = { .type = NLA_FLAG }
};
/*
* A trivial power-of-two bitmask technique is used for speed, since this
* operation is done for every incoming TIPC packet. The number of hash table
* entries has been chosen so that no hash chain exceeds 8 nodes and will
* usually be much smaller (typically only a single node).
*/
static unsigned int tipc_hashfn(u32 addr)
{
return addr & (NODE_HTABLE_SIZE - 1);
}
static void tipc_node_kref_release(struct kref *kref)
{
struct tipc_node *node = container_of(kref, struct tipc_node, kref);
tipc_node_delete(node);
}
void tipc_node_put(struct tipc_node *node)
{
kref_put(&node->kref, tipc_node_kref_release);
}
static void tipc_node_get(struct tipc_node *node)
{
kref_get(&node->kref);
}
/*
* tipc_node_find - locate specified node object, if it exists
*/
struct tipc_node *tipc_node_find(struct net *net, u32 addr)
{
struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(net, tipc_net_id);
struct tipc_node *node;
if (unlikely(!in_own_cluster_exact(net, addr)))
return NULL;
rcu_read_lock();
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(node, &tn->node_htable[tipc_hashfn(addr)],
hash) {
if (node->addr == addr) {
tipc_node_get(node);
rcu_read_unlock();
return node;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
}
struct tipc_node *tipc_node_create(struct net *net, u32 addr)
{
struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(net, tipc_net_id);
struct tipc_node *n_ptr, *temp_node;
spin_lock_bh(&tn->node_list_lock);
n_ptr = tipc_node_find(net, addr);
if (n_ptr)
goto exit;
n_ptr = kzalloc(sizeof(*n_ptr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!n_ptr) {
pr_warn("Node creation failed, no memory\n");
goto exit;
}
n_ptr->addr = addr;
n_ptr->net = net;
kref_init(&n_ptr->kref);
spin_lock_init(&n_ptr->lock);
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&n_ptr->hash);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n_ptr->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n_ptr->publ_list);
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n_ptr->conn_sks);
skb_queue_head_init(&n_ptr->bclink.namedq);
__skb_queue_head_init(&n_ptr->bclink.deferdq);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&n_ptr->hash, &tn->node_htable[tipc_hashfn(addr)]);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(temp_node, &tn->node_list, list) {
if (n_ptr->addr < temp_node->addr)
break;
}
list_add_tail_rcu(&n_ptr->list, &temp_node->list);
n_ptr->state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING;
n_ptr->signature = INVALID_NODE_SIG;
n_ptr->active_links[0] = INVALID_BEARER_ID;
n_ptr->active_links[1] = INVALID_BEARER_ID;
tipc_node_get(n_ptr);
setup_timer(&n_ptr->timer, tipc_node_timeout, (unsigned long)n_ptr);
n_ptr->keepalive_intv = U32_MAX;
exit:
spin_unlock_bh(&tn->node_list_lock);
return n_ptr;
}
static void tipc_node_calculate_timer(struct tipc_node *n, struct tipc_link *l)
{
unsigned long tol = l->tolerance;
unsigned long intv = ((tol / 4) > 500) ? 500 : tol / 4;
unsigned long keepalive_intv = msecs_to_jiffies(intv);
/* Link with lowest tolerance determines timer interval */
if (keepalive_intv < n->keepalive_intv)
n->keepalive_intv = keepalive_intv;
/* Ensure link's abort limit corresponds to current interval */
l->abort_limit = l->tolerance / jiffies_to_msecs(n->keepalive_intv);
}
static void tipc_node_delete(struct tipc_node *node)
{
list_del_rcu(&node->list);
hlist_del_rcu(&node->hash);
kfree_rcu(node, rcu);
}
void tipc_node_stop(struct net *net)
{
struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(net, tipc_net_id);
struct tipc_node *node, *t_node;
spin_lock_bh(&tn->node_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(node, t_node, &tn->node_list, list) {
if (del_timer(&node->timer))
tipc_node_put(node);
tipc_node_put(node);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&tn->node_list_lock);
}
int tipc_node_add_conn(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u32 port, u32 peer_port)
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
{
struct tipc_node *node;
struct tipc_sock_conn *conn;
int err = 0;
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
if (in_own_node(net, dnode))
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
return 0;
node = tipc_node_find(net, dnode);
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
if (!node) {
pr_warn("Connecting sock to node 0x%x failed\n", dnode);
return -EHOSTUNREACH;
}
conn = kmalloc(sizeof(*conn), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!conn) {
err = -EHOSTUNREACH;
goto exit;
}
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
conn->peer_node = dnode;
conn->port = port;
conn->peer_port = peer_port;
tipc_node_lock(node);
list_add_tail(&conn->list, &node->conn_sks);
tipc_node_unlock(node);
exit:
tipc_node_put(node);
return err;
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
}
void tipc_node_remove_conn(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u32 port)
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
{
struct tipc_node *node;
struct tipc_sock_conn *conn, *safe;
if (in_own_node(net, dnode))
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
return;
node = tipc_node_find(net, dnode);
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
if (!node)
return;
tipc_node_lock(node);
list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, safe, &node->conn_sks, list) {
if (port != conn->port)
continue;
list_del(&conn->list);
kfree(conn);
}
tipc_node_unlock(node);
tipc_node_put(node);
tipc: use message to abort connections when losing contact to node In the current implementation, each 'struct tipc_node' instance keeps a linked list of those ports/sockets that are connected to the node represented by that struct. The purpose of this is to let the node object know which sockets to alert when it loses contact with its peer node, i.e., which sockets need to have their connections aborted. This entails an unwanted direct reference from the node structure back to the port/socket structure, and a need to grab port_lock when we have to make an upcall to the port. We want to get rid of this unecessary BH entry point into the socket, and also eliminate its use of port_lock. In this commit, we instead let the node struct keep list of "connected socket" structs, which each represents a connected socket, but is allocated independently by the node at the moment of connection. If the node loses contact with its peer node, the list is traversed, and a "connection abort" message is created for each entry in the list. The message is sent to it respective connected socket using the ordinary data path, and the receiving socket aborts its connections upon reception of the message. This enables us to get rid of the direct reference from 'struct node' to ´struct port', and another unwanted BH access point to the latter. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-23 05:09:08 +07:00
}
/* tipc_node_timeout - handle expiration of node timer
*/
static void tipc_node_timeout(unsigned long data)
{
struct tipc_node *n = (struct tipc_node *)data;
struct sk_buff_head xmitq;
struct tipc_link *l;
struct tipc_media_addr *maddr;
int bearer_id;
int rc = 0;
__skb_queue_head_init(&xmitq);
for (bearer_id = 0; bearer_id < MAX_BEARERS; bearer_id++) {
tipc_node_lock(n);
l = n->links[bearer_id].link;
if (l) {
/* Link tolerance may change asynchronously: */
tipc_node_calculate_timer(n, l);
rc = tipc_link_timeout(l, &xmitq);
if (rc & TIPC_LINK_DOWN_EVT)
tipc_node_link_down(n, bearer_id);
}
tipc_node_unlock(n);
maddr = &n->links[bearer_id].maddr;
tipc_bearer_xmit(n->net, bearer_id, &xmitq, maddr);
}
if (!mod_timer(&n->timer, jiffies + n->keepalive_intv))
tipc_node_get(n);
tipc_node_put(n);
}
/**
* tipc_node_link_up - handle addition of link
*
* Link becomes active (alone or shared) or standby, depending on its priority.
*/
static void tipc_node_link_up(struct tipc_node *n, int bearer_id,
struct sk_buff_head *xmitq)
{
int *slot0 = &n->active_links[0];
int *slot1 = &n->active_links[1];
struct tipc_link *ol = node_active_link(n, 0);
struct tipc_link *nl = n->links[bearer_id].link;
if (n->working_links > 1) {
pr_warn("Attempt to establish 3rd link to %x\n", n->addr);
return;
}
n->working_links++;
n->action_flags |= TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_UP;
n->link_id = nl->peer_bearer_id << 16 | bearer_id;
/* Leave room for tunnel header when returning 'mtu' to users: */
n->links[bearer_id].mtu = nl->mtu - INT_H_SIZE;
tipc_bearer_add_dest(n->net, bearer_id, n->addr);
pr_debug("Established link <%s> on network plane %c\n",
nl->name, nl->net_plane);
/* First link? => give it both slots */
if (!ol) {
*slot0 = bearer_id;
*slot1 = bearer_id;
nl->exec_mode = TIPC_LINK_OPEN;
node_established_contact(n);
return;
}
/* Second link => redistribute slots */
if (nl->priority > ol->priority) {
pr_debug("Old link <%s> becomes standby\n", ol->name);
*slot0 = bearer_id;
*slot1 = bearer_id;
} else if (nl->priority == ol->priority) {
*slot0 = bearer_id;
} else {
pr_debug("New link <%s> is standby\n", nl->name);
}
/* Prepare synchronization with first link */
tipc_link_tnl_prepare(ol, nl, SYNCH_MSG, xmitq);
}
/**
* tipc_node_link_down - handle loss of link
*/
static void tipc_node_link_down(struct tipc_node *n, int bearer_id)
{
int *slot0 = &n->active_links[0];
int *slot1 = &n->active_links[1];
struct tipc_media_addr *maddr = &n->links[bearer_id].maddr;
int i, highest = 0;
struct tipc_link *l, *_l, *tnl;
struct sk_buff_head xmitq;
l = n->links[bearer_id].link;
if (!l || !tipc_link_is_up(l))
return;
__skb_queue_head_init(&xmitq);
n->working_links--;
n->action_flags |= TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_DOWN;
n->link_id = l->peer_bearer_id << 16 | bearer_id;
tipc_bearer_remove_dest(n->net, l->bearer_id, n->addr);
pr_debug("Lost link <%s> on network plane %c\n",
l->name, l->net_plane);
/* Select new active link if any available */
*slot0 = INVALID_BEARER_ID;
*slot1 = INVALID_BEARER_ID;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BEARERS; i++) {
_l = n->links[i].link;
if (!_l || !tipc_link_is_up(_l))
continue;
if (_l == l)
continue;
if (_l->priority < highest)
continue;
if (_l->priority > highest) {
highest = _l->priority;
*slot0 = i;
*slot1 = i;
continue;
}
*slot1 = i;
}
if (!tipc_node_is_up(n)) {
tipc_link_reset(l);
node_lost_contact(n);
return;
}
/* There is still a working link => initiate failover */
tnl = node_active_link(n, 0);
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n, NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT);
n->sync_point = tnl->rcv_nxt + (U16_MAX / 2 - 1);
tipc_link_tnl_prepare(l, tnl, FAILOVER_MSG, &xmitq);
tipc_link_reset(l);
tipc_bearer_xmit(n->net, tnl->bearer_id, &xmitq, maddr);
}
bool tipc_node_is_up(struct tipc_node *n)
{
return n->active_links[0] != INVALID_BEARER_ID;
}
void tipc_node_check_dest(struct tipc_node *n, struct tipc_bearer *b,
bool *link_up, bool *addr_match,
struct tipc_media_addr *maddr)
{
struct tipc_link *l = n->links[b->identity].link;
struct tipc_media_addr *curr = &n->links[b->identity].maddr;
*link_up = l && tipc_link_is_up(l);
*addr_match = l && !memcmp(curr, maddr, sizeof(*maddr));
}
bool tipc_node_update_dest(struct tipc_node *n, struct tipc_bearer *b,
struct tipc_media_addr *maddr)
{
struct tipc_link *l = n->links[b->identity].link;
struct tipc_media_addr *curr = &n->links[b->identity].maddr;
struct sk_buff_head *inputq = &n->links[b->identity].inputq;
if (!l) {
l = tipc_link_create(n, b, maddr, inputq, &n->bclink.namedq);
if (!l)
return false;
tipc_node_calculate_timer(n, l);
if (n->link_cnt == 1) {
if (!mod_timer(&n->timer, jiffies + n->keepalive_intv))
tipc_node_get(n);
}
}
memcpy(&l->media_addr, maddr, sizeof(*maddr));
memcpy(curr, maddr, sizeof(*maddr));
tipc_node_link_down(n, b->identity);
return true;
}
void tipc_node_delete_links(struct net *net, int bearer_id)
{
struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(net, tipc_net_id);
struct tipc_link *l;
struct tipc_node *n;
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &tn->node_list, list) {
tipc_node_lock(n);
l = n->links[bearer_id].link;
if (l) {
tipc_node_link_down(n, bearer_id);
n->links[bearer_id].link = NULL;
n->link_cnt--;
}
tipc_node_unlock(n);
kfree(l);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
static void tipc_node_reset_links(struct tipc_node *n)
{
char addr_string[16];
u32 i;
tipc_node_lock(n);
pr_warn("Resetting all links to %s\n",
tipc_addr_string_fill(addr_string, n->addr));
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BEARERS; i++) {
if (!n->links[i].link)
continue;
tipc_node_link_down(n, i);
}
tipc_node_unlock(n);
}
void tipc_node_attach_link(struct tipc_node *n_ptr, struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
{
n_ptr->links[l_ptr->bearer_id].link = l_ptr;
n_ptr->link_cnt++;
}
void tipc_node_detach_link(struct tipc_node *n_ptr, struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BEARERS; i++) {
if (l_ptr != n_ptr->links[i].link)
continue;
n_ptr->links[i].link = NULL;
n_ptr->link_cnt--;
}
}
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
/* tipc_node_fsm_evt - node finite state machine
* Determines when contact is allowed with peer node
*/
static void tipc_node_fsm_evt(struct tipc_node *n, int evt)
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
{
int state = n->state;
switch (state) {
case SELF_DOWN_PEER_DOWN:
switch (evt) {
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_UP_PEER_COMING;
break;
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_COMING_PEER_UP;
break;
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
default:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
goto illegal_evt;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
break;
case SELF_UP_PEER_UP:
switch (evt) {
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING;
break;
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN;
break;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
state = NODE_SYNCHING;
break;
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
state = NODE_FAILINGOVER;
break;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
break;
default:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
goto illegal_evt;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
break;
case SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING:
switch (evt) {
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_DOWN;
break;
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
default:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
goto illegal_evt;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
break;
case SELF_UP_PEER_COMING:
switch (evt) {
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_UP_PEER_UP;
break;
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING;
break;
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
default:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
goto illegal_evt;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
break;
case SELF_COMING_PEER_UP:
switch (evt) {
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_UP_PEER_UP;
break;
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN;
break;
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
default:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
goto illegal_evt;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
break;
case SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN:
switch (evt) {
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_DOWN;
break;
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
default:
goto illegal_evt;
}
break;
case NODE_FAILINGOVER:
switch (evt) {
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING;
break;
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN;
break;
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
state = SELF_UP_PEER_UP;
break;
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
default:
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
goto illegal_evt;
}
break;
case NODE_SYNCHING:
switch (evt) {
case SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING;
break;
case PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT:
state = SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN;
break;
case NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT:
state = SELF_UP_PEER_UP;
break;
case NODE_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
state = NODE_FAILINGOVER;
break;
case NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT:
case SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
case PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT:
break;
case NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT:
default:
goto illegal_evt;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
break;
default:
pr_err("Unknown node fsm state %x\n", state);
break;
}
n->state = state;
tipc: extend node FSM In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER, plus four new events to enter and leave those states. This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it. The node FSM now looks as follows: +-----------------------------------------+ | PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | +------------------------+----------------+ | |SELF_DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | |NODE_ | |NODE_ | | | +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING |------------+ | | |SELF_ +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+ PEER_ | | | |DOWN_EVT | A BEGIN_EVT A | DOWN_EVT| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_ |SYNCH_ |SYNCH_ | | | | |END_EVT |BEGIN_EVT |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+ | | | | | +------->| SELF_UP_ |<-------+ | | | | +----------------| PEER_UP |------------------+ | | | | |SELF_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ PEER_DOWN_EVT| | | | | | A A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PEER_UP_EVT| |SELF_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | | | V V V | | V V V +------------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +------------+ |SELF_DOWN_ | |SELF_UP_ | |PEER_UP_ | |PEER_DOWN | |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING| |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING| +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+ +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+ | DOWN_EVT A A DOWN_EVT | | | | | | | | | | SELF_UP_EVT| |PEER_UP_EVT | | | | | | | | | |PEER_DOWN_EVT +--------------+ SELF_DOWN_EVT| +------------------->| SELF_DOWN_ |<--------------------+ | PEER_DOWN | +--------------+ Tested-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-31 05:24:18 +07:00
return;
illegal_evt:
pr_err("Illegal node fsm evt %x in state %x\n", evt, state);
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
bool tipc_node_filter_pkt(struct tipc_node *n, struct tipc_msg *hdr)
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
{
int state = n->state;
if (likely(state == SELF_UP_PEER_UP))
return true;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
if (state == SELF_LEAVING_PEER_DOWN)
return false;
if (state == SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING) {
if (msg_peer_node_is_up(hdr))
return false;
}
return true;
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
}
static void node_established_contact(struct tipc_node *n_ptr)
{
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n_ptr, SELF_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT);
n_ptr->action_flags |= TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_UP;
tipc: introduce message to synchronize broadcast link Upon establishing a first link between two nodes, there is currently a risk that the two endpoints will disagree on exactly which sequence number reception and acknowleding of broadcast packets should start. The following scenarios may happen: 1: Node A sends an ACTIVATE message to B, telling it to start acking packets from sequence number N. 2: Node A sends out broadcast N, but does not expect an acknowledge from B, since B is not yet in its broadcast receiver's list. 3: Node A receives ACK for N from all nodes except B, and releases packet N. 4: Node B receives the ACTIVATE, activates its link endpoint, and stores the value N as sequence number of first expected packet. 5: Node B sends a NAME_DISTR message to A. 6: Node A receives the NAME_DISTR message, and activates its endpoint. At this moment B is added to A's broadcast receiver's set. Node A also sets sequence number 0 as the first broadcast packet to be received from B. 7: Node A sends broadcast N+1. 8: B receives N+1, determines there is a gap in the sequence, since it is expecting N, and sends a NACK for N back to A. 9: Node A has already released N, so no retransmission is possible. The broadcast link in direction A->B is stale. In addition to, or instead of, 7-9 above, the following may happen: 10: Node B sends broadcast M > 0 to A. 11: Node A receives M, falsely decides there must be a gap, since it is expecting packet 0, and asks for retransmission of packets [0,M-1]. 12: Node B has already released these packets, so the broadcast link is stale in direction B->A. We solve this problem by introducing a new unicast message type, BCAST_PROTOCOL/STATE, to convey the sequence number of the next sent broadcast packet to the other endpoint, at exactly the moment that endpoint is added to the own node's broadcast receivers list, and before any other unicast messages are permitted to be sent. Furthermore, we don't allow any node to start receiving and processing broadcast packets until this new synchronization message has been received. To maintain backwards compatibility, we still open up for broadcast reception if we receive a NAME_DISTR message without any preceding broadcast sync message. In this case, we must assume that the other end has an older code version, and will never send out the new synchronization message. Hence, for mixed old and new nodes, the issue arising in 7-12 of the above may happen with the same probability as before. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-11-16 12:51:31 +07:00
n_ptr->bclink.oos_state = 0;
n_ptr->bclink.acked = tipc_bclink_get_last_sent(n_ptr->net);
tipc_bclink_add_node(n_ptr->net, n_ptr->addr);
}
static void node_lost_contact(struct tipc_node *n_ptr)
{
char addr_string[16];
struct tipc_sock_conn *conn, *safe;
struct list_head *conns = &n_ptr->conn_sks;
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(n_ptr->net, tipc_net_id);
uint i;
pr_debug("Lost contact with %s\n",
tipc_addr_string_fill(addr_string, n_ptr->addr));
/* Flush broadcast link info associated with lost node */
if (n_ptr->bclink.recv_permitted) {
__skb_queue_purge(&n_ptr->bclink.deferdq);
if (n_ptr->bclink.reasm_buf) {
kfree_skb(n_ptr->bclink.reasm_buf);
n_ptr->bclink.reasm_buf = NULL;
}
tipc_bclink_remove_node(n_ptr->net, n_ptr->addr);
tipc_bclink_acknowledge(n_ptr, INVALID_LINK_SEQ);
n_ptr->bclink.recv_permitted = false;
}
/* Abort any ongoing link failover */
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BEARERS; i++) {
struct tipc_link *l_ptr = n_ptr->links[i].link;
if (!l_ptr)
continue;
l_ptr->exec_mode = TIPC_LINK_OPEN;
kfree_skb(l_ptr->failover_reasm_skb);
l_ptr->failover_reasm_skb = NULL;
tipc_link_reset_fragments(l_ptr);
}
/* Prevent re-contact with node until cleanup is done */
tipc: introduce node contact FSM The logics for determining when a node is permitted to establish and maintain contact with its peer node becomes non-trivial in the presence of multiple parallel links that may come and go independently. A known failure scenario is that one endpoint registers both its links to the peer lost, cleans up it binding table, and prepares for a table update once contact is re-establihed, while the other endpoint may see its links reset and re-established one by one, hence seeing no need to re-synchronize the binding table. To avoid this, a node must not allow re-establishing contact until it has confirmation that even the peer has lost both links. Currently, the mechanism for handling this consists of setting and resetting two state flags from different locations in the code. This solution is hard to understand and maintain. A closer analysis even reveals that it is not completely safe. In this commit we do instead introduce an FSM that keeps track of the conditions for when the node can establish and maintain links. It has six states and four events, and is strictly based on explicit knowledge about the own node's and the peer node's contact states. Only events leading to state change are shown as edges in the figure below. +--------------+ | SELF_UP/ | +---------------->| PEER_COMING |-----------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ |PEER_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| SELF_LOST_CONTACT | |CONTACT | v | | +--------------+ | | PEER_ | SELF_DOWN/ | SELF_ | | LOST_ +--| PEER_LEAVING |<--+ LOST_ v +-------------+ CONTACT | +--------------+ | CONTACT +-----------+ | SELF_DOWN/ |<----------+ +----------| SELF_UP/ | | PEER_DOWN |<----------+ +----------| PEER_UP | +-------------+ SELF_ | +--------------+ | PEER_ +-----------+ | LOST_ +--| SELF_LEAVING/|<--+ LOST_ A | CONTACT | PEER_DOWN | CONTACT | | +--------------+ | | A | PEER_ | PEER_LOST_CONTACT | |SELF_ ESTBL_ | | |ESTBL_ CONTACT| +--------------+ |CONTACT +---------------->| PEER_UP/ |-----------------+ | SELF_COMING | +--------------+ Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-17 03:54:30 +07:00
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n_ptr, SELF_LOST_CONTACT_EVT);
/* Notify publications from this node */
n_ptr->action_flags |= TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_DOWN;
/* Notify sockets connected to node */
list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, safe, conns, list) {
skb = tipc_msg_create(TIPC_CRITICAL_IMPORTANCE, TIPC_CONN_MSG,
SHORT_H_SIZE, 0, tn->own_addr,
conn->peer_node, conn->port,
conn->peer_port, TIPC_ERR_NO_NODE);
if (likely(skb)) {
skb_queue_tail(n_ptr->inputq, skb);
n_ptr->action_flags |= TIPC_MSG_EVT;
}
list_del(&conn->list);
kfree(conn);
}
}
/**
* tipc_node_get_linkname - get the name of a link
*
* @bearer_id: id of the bearer
* @node: peer node address
* @linkname: link name output buffer
*
* Returns 0 on success
*/
int tipc_node_get_linkname(struct net *net, u32 bearer_id, u32 addr,
char *linkname, size_t len)
{
struct tipc_link *link;
int err = -EINVAL;
struct tipc_node *node = tipc_node_find(net, addr);
if (!node)
return err;
if (bearer_id >= MAX_BEARERS)
goto exit;
tipc_node_lock(node);
link = node->links[bearer_id].link;
if (link) {
strncpy(linkname, link->name, len);
err = 0;
}
exit:
tipc_node_unlock(node);
tipc_node_put(node);
return err;
}
void tipc_node_unlock(struct tipc_node *node)
{
struct net *net = node->net;
u32 addr = 0;
tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception TIPC handles message cardinality and sequencing at the link layer, before passing messages upwards to the destination sockets. During the upcall from link to socket no locks are held. It is therefore possible, and we see it happen occasionally, that messages arriving in different threads and delivered in sequence still bypass each other before they reach the destination socket. This must not happen, since it violates the sequentiality guarantee. We solve this by adding a new input buffer queue to the link structure. Arriving messages are added safely to the tail of that queue by the link, while the head of the queue is consumed, also safely, by the receiving socket. Sequentiality is secured per socket by only allowing buffers to be dequeued inside the socket lock. Since there may be multiple simultaneous readers of the queue, we use a 'filter' parameter to reduce the risk that they peek the same buffer from the queue, hence also reducing the risk of contention on the receiving socket locks. This solves the sequentiality problem, and seems to cause no measurable performance degradation. A nice side effect of this change is that lock handling in the functions tipc_rcv() and tipc_bcast_rcv() now becomes uniform, something that will enable future simplifications of those functions. Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-02-05 20:36:41 +07:00
u32 flags = node->action_flags;
u32 link_id = 0;
struct list_head *publ_list;
tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception TIPC handles message cardinality and sequencing at the link layer, before passing messages upwards to the destination sockets. During the upcall from link to socket no locks are held. It is therefore possible, and we see it happen occasionally, that messages arriving in different threads and delivered in sequence still bypass each other before they reach the destination socket. This must not happen, since it violates the sequentiality guarantee. We solve this by adding a new input buffer queue to the link structure. Arriving messages are added safely to the tail of that queue by the link, while the head of the queue is consumed, also safely, by the receiving socket. Sequentiality is secured per socket by only allowing buffers to be dequeued inside the socket lock. Since there may be multiple simultaneous readers of the queue, we use a 'filter' parameter to reduce the risk that they peek the same buffer from the queue, hence also reducing the risk of contention on the receiving socket locks. This solves the sequentiality problem, and seems to cause no measurable performance degradation. A nice side effect of this change is that lock handling in the functions tipc_rcv() and tipc_bcast_rcv() now becomes uniform, something that will enable future simplifications of those functions. Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-02-05 20:36:41 +07:00
struct sk_buff_head *inputq = node->inputq;
struct sk_buff_head *namedq;
tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception TIPC handles message cardinality and sequencing at the link layer, before passing messages upwards to the destination sockets. During the upcall from link to socket no locks are held. It is therefore possible, and we see it happen occasionally, that messages arriving in different threads and delivered in sequence still bypass each other before they reach the destination socket. This must not happen, since it violates the sequentiality guarantee. We solve this by adding a new input buffer queue to the link structure. Arriving messages are added safely to the tail of that queue by the link, while the head of the queue is consumed, also safely, by the receiving socket. Sequentiality is secured per socket by only allowing buffers to be dequeued inside the socket lock. Since there may be multiple simultaneous readers of the queue, we use a 'filter' parameter to reduce the risk that they peek the same buffer from the queue, hence also reducing the risk of contention on the receiving socket locks. This solves the sequentiality problem, and seems to cause no measurable performance degradation. A nice side effect of this change is that lock handling in the functions tipc_rcv() and tipc_bcast_rcv() now becomes uniform, something that will enable future simplifications of those functions. Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-02-05 20:36:41 +07:00
if (likely(!flags || (flags == TIPC_MSG_EVT))) {
node->action_flags = 0;
spin_unlock_bh(&node->lock);
tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception TIPC handles message cardinality and sequencing at the link layer, before passing messages upwards to the destination sockets. During the upcall from link to socket no locks are held. It is therefore possible, and we see it happen occasionally, that messages arriving in different threads and delivered in sequence still bypass each other before they reach the destination socket. This must not happen, since it violates the sequentiality guarantee. We solve this by adding a new input buffer queue to the link structure. Arriving messages are added safely to the tail of that queue by the link, while the head of the queue is consumed, also safely, by the receiving socket. Sequentiality is secured per socket by only allowing buffers to be dequeued inside the socket lock. Since there may be multiple simultaneous readers of the queue, we use a 'filter' parameter to reduce the risk that they peek the same buffer from the queue, hence also reducing the risk of contention on the receiving socket locks. This solves the sequentiality problem, and seems to cause no measurable performance degradation. A nice side effect of this change is that lock handling in the functions tipc_rcv() and tipc_bcast_rcv() now becomes uniform, something that will enable future simplifications of those functions. Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-02-05 20:36:41 +07:00
if (flags == TIPC_MSG_EVT)
tipc_sk_rcv(net, inputq);
return;
}
addr = node->addr;
link_id = node->link_id;
tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception TIPC handles message cardinality and sequencing at the link layer, before passing messages upwards to the destination sockets. During the upcall from link to socket no locks are held. It is therefore possible, and we see it happen occasionally, that messages arriving in different threads and delivered in sequence still bypass each other before they reach the destination socket. This must not happen, since it violates the sequentiality guarantee. We solve this by adding a new input buffer queue to the link structure. Arriving messages are added safely to the tail of that queue by the link, while the head of the queue is consumed, also safely, by the receiving socket. Sequentiality is secured per socket by only allowing buffers to be dequeued inside the socket lock. Since there may be multiple simultaneous readers of the queue, we use a 'filter' parameter to reduce the risk that they peek the same buffer from the queue, hence also reducing the risk of contention on the receiving socket locks. This solves the sequentiality problem, and seems to cause no measurable performance degradation. A nice side effect of this change is that lock handling in the functions tipc_rcv() and tipc_bcast_rcv() now becomes uniform, something that will enable future simplifications of those functions. Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-02-05 20:36:41 +07:00
namedq = node->namedq;
publ_list = &node->publ_list;
node->action_flags &= ~(TIPC_MSG_EVT |
TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_DOWN | TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_UP |
TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_DOWN | TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_UP |
TIPC_WAKEUP_BCAST_USERS | TIPC_BCAST_MSG_EVT |
tipc: fix potential deadlock when all links are reset [ 60.988363] ====================================================== [ 60.988754] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 60.989152] 3.19.0+ #194 Not tainted [ 60.989377] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 60.989781] swapper/3/0 is trying to acquire lock: [ 60.990079] (&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa0006dca>] tipc_link_retransmit+0x1aa/0x240 [tipc] [ 60.990743] [ 60.990743] but task is already holding lock: [ 60.991106] (&(&bclink->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa00004be>] tipc_bclink_lock+0x8e/0xa0 [tipc] [ 60.991738] [ 60.991738] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 60.991738] [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 60.992174] -> #1 (&(&bclink->lock)->rlock){+.-...}: [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff810a9c0c>] lock_acquire+0x9c/0x140 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179c41f>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3f/0x50 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa00004be>] tipc_bclink_lock+0x8e/0xa0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0000f57>] tipc_bclink_add_node+0x97/0xf0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0011815>] tipc_node_link_up+0xf5/0x110 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0007783>] link_state_event+0x2b3/0x4f0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa00193c0>] tipc_link_proto_rcv+0x24c/0x418 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0008857>] tipc_rcv+0x827/0xac0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0002ca3>] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x73/0xd0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81646e66>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x746/0x980 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff816470c1>] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x70 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647295>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x35/0x130 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81648218>] napi_gro_receive+0x158/0x1d0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81559e05>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x155/0x490 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8155c1b7>] e1000_clean+0x267/0x990 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647b60>] net_rx_action+0x150/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105ec43>] __do_softirq+0x123/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105f12e>] irq_exit+0x8e/0xb0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179f9f5>] do_IRQ+0x65/0x110 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179da6f>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x13 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8100de9f>] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8109dfa6>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2f6/0x3f0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81033cda>] start_secondary+0x13a/0x150 [ 60.992174] -> #0 (&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}: [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff810a8f7d>] __lock_acquire+0x163d/0x1ca0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff810a9c0c>] lock_acquire+0x9c/0x140 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179c41f>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3f/0x50 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0006dca>] tipc_link_retransmit+0x1aa/0x240 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0001e11>] tipc_bclink_rcv+0x611/0x640 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0008646>] tipc_rcv+0x616/0xac0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0002ca3>] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x73/0xd0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81646e66>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x746/0x980 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff816470c1>] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x70 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647295>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x35/0x130 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81648218>] napi_gro_receive+0x158/0x1d0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81559e05>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x155/0x490 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8155c1b7>] e1000_clean+0x267/0x990 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647b60>] net_rx_action+0x150/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105ec43>] __do_softirq+0x123/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105f12e>] irq_exit+0x8e/0xb0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179f9f5>] do_IRQ+0x65/0x110 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179da6f>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x13 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8100de9f>] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8109dfa6>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2f6/0x3f0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81033cda>] start_secondary+0x13a/0x150 [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] other info that might help us debug this: [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] CPU0 CPU1 [ 60.992174] ---- ---- [ 60.992174] lock(&(&bclink->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] lock(&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] lock(&(&bclink->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] lock(&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] 3 locks held by swapper/3/0: [ 60.992174] #0: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff81646791>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x71/0x980 [ 60.992174] #1: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa0002c35>] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x5/0xd0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] #2: (&(&bclink->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa00004be>] tipc_bclink_lock+0x8e/0xa0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] The correct the sequence of grabbing n_ptr->lock and bclink->lock should be that the former is first held and the latter is then taken, which exactly happened on CPU1. But especially when the retransmission of broadcast link is failed, bclink->lock is first held in tipc_bclink_rcv(), and n_ptr->lock is taken in link_retransmit_failure() called by tipc_link_retransmit() subsequently, which is demonstrated on CPU0. As a result, deadlock occurs. If the order of holding the two locks happening on CPU0 is reversed, the deadlock risk will be relieved. Therefore, the node lock taken in link_retransmit_failure() originally is moved to tipc_bclink_rcv() so that it's obtained before bclink lock. But the precondition of the adjustment of node lock is that responding to bclink reset event must be moved from tipc_bclink_unlock() to tipc_node_unlock(). Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-03-26 17:10:23 +07:00
TIPC_NAMED_MSG_EVT | TIPC_BCAST_RESET);
spin_unlock_bh(&node->lock);
if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_DOWN)
tipc_publ_notify(net, publ_list, addr);
tipc: fix bug in multicast congestion handling One aim of commit 50100a5e39461b2a61d6040e73c384766c29975d ("tipc: use pseudo message to wake up sockets after link congestion") was to handle link congestion abatement in a uniform way for both unicast and multicast transmit. However, the latter doesn't work correctly, and has been broken since the referenced commit was applied. If a user now sends a burst of multicast messages that is big enough to cause broadcast link congestion, it will be put to sleep, and not be waked up when the congestion abates as it should be. This has two reasons. First, the flag that is used, TIPC_WAKEUP_USERS, is set correctly, but in the wrong field. Instead of setting it in the 'action_flags' field of the arrival node struct, it is by mistake set in the dummy node struct that is owned by the broadcast link, where it will never tested for. Second, we cannot use the same flag for waking up unicast and multicast users, since the function tipc_node_unlock() needs to pick the wakeup pseudo messages to deliver from different queues. It must hence be able to distinguish between the two cases. This commit solves this problem by adding a new flag TIPC_WAKEUP_BCAST_USERS, and a new function tipc_bclink_wakeup_user(). The latter is to be called by tipc_node_unlock() when the named flag, now set in the correct field, is encountered. v2: using explicit 'unsigned int' declaration instead of 'uint', as per comment from David Miller. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-10-08 01:12:34 +07:00
if (flags & TIPC_WAKEUP_BCAST_USERS)
tipc_bclink_wakeup_users(net);
tipc: fix bug in multicast congestion handling One aim of commit 50100a5e39461b2a61d6040e73c384766c29975d ("tipc: use pseudo message to wake up sockets after link congestion") was to handle link congestion abatement in a uniform way for both unicast and multicast transmit. However, the latter doesn't work correctly, and has been broken since the referenced commit was applied. If a user now sends a burst of multicast messages that is big enough to cause broadcast link congestion, it will be put to sleep, and not be waked up when the congestion abates as it should be. This has two reasons. First, the flag that is used, TIPC_WAKEUP_USERS, is set correctly, but in the wrong field. Instead of setting it in the 'action_flags' field of the arrival node struct, it is by mistake set in the dummy node struct that is owned by the broadcast link, where it will never tested for. Second, we cannot use the same flag for waking up unicast and multicast users, since the function tipc_node_unlock() needs to pick the wakeup pseudo messages to deliver from different queues. It must hence be able to distinguish between the two cases. This commit solves this problem by adding a new flag TIPC_WAKEUP_BCAST_USERS, and a new function tipc_bclink_wakeup_user(). The latter is to be called by tipc_node_unlock() when the named flag, now set in the correct field, is encountered. v2: using explicit 'unsigned int' declaration instead of 'uint', as per comment from David Miller. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-10-08 01:12:34 +07:00
if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_UP)
tipc_named_node_up(net, addr);
if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_UP)
tipc_nametbl_publish(net, TIPC_LINK_STATE, addr, addr,
TIPC_NODE_SCOPE, link_id, addr);
if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_DOWN)
tipc_nametbl_withdraw(net, TIPC_LINK_STATE, addr,
link_id, addr);
tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception TIPC handles message cardinality and sequencing at the link layer, before passing messages upwards to the destination sockets. During the upcall from link to socket no locks are held. It is therefore possible, and we see it happen occasionally, that messages arriving in different threads and delivered in sequence still bypass each other before they reach the destination socket. This must not happen, since it violates the sequentiality guarantee. We solve this by adding a new input buffer queue to the link structure. Arriving messages are added safely to the tail of that queue by the link, while the head of the queue is consumed, also safely, by the receiving socket. Sequentiality is secured per socket by only allowing buffers to be dequeued inside the socket lock. Since there may be multiple simultaneous readers of the queue, we use a 'filter' parameter to reduce the risk that they peek the same buffer from the queue, hence also reducing the risk of contention on the receiving socket locks. This solves the sequentiality problem, and seems to cause no measurable performance degradation. A nice side effect of this change is that lock handling in the functions tipc_rcv() and tipc_bcast_rcv() now becomes uniform, something that will enable future simplifications of those functions. Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-02-05 20:36:41 +07:00
if (flags & TIPC_MSG_EVT)
tipc_sk_rcv(net, inputq);
if (flags & TIPC_NAMED_MSG_EVT)
tipc_named_rcv(net, namedq);
if (flags & TIPC_BCAST_MSG_EVT)
tipc_bclink_input(net);
tipc: fix potential deadlock when all links are reset [ 60.988363] ====================================================== [ 60.988754] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 60.989152] 3.19.0+ #194 Not tainted [ 60.989377] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 60.989781] swapper/3/0 is trying to acquire lock: [ 60.990079] (&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa0006dca>] tipc_link_retransmit+0x1aa/0x240 [tipc] [ 60.990743] [ 60.990743] but task is already holding lock: [ 60.991106] (&(&bclink->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa00004be>] tipc_bclink_lock+0x8e/0xa0 [tipc] [ 60.991738] [ 60.991738] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 60.991738] [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 60.992174] -> #1 (&(&bclink->lock)->rlock){+.-...}: [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff810a9c0c>] lock_acquire+0x9c/0x140 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179c41f>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3f/0x50 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa00004be>] tipc_bclink_lock+0x8e/0xa0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0000f57>] tipc_bclink_add_node+0x97/0xf0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0011815>] tipc_node_link_up+0xf5/0x110 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0007783>] link_state_event+0x2b3/0x4f0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa00193c0>] tipc_link_proto_rcv+0x24c/0x418 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0008857>] tipc_rcv+0x827/0xac0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0002ca3>] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x73/0xd0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81646e66>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x746/0x980 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff816470c1>] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x70 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647295>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x35/0x130 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81648218>] napi_gro_receive+0x158/0x1d0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81559e05>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x155/0x490 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8155c1b7>] e1000_clean+0x267/0x990 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647b60>] net_rx_action+0x150/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105ec43>] __do_softirq+0x123/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105f12e>] irq_exit+0x8e/0xb0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179f9f5>] do_IRQ+0x65/0x110 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179da6f>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x13 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8100de9f>] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8109dfa6>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2f6/0x3f0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81033cda>] start_secondary+0x13a/0x150 [ 60.992174] -> #0 (&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}: [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff810a8f7d>] __lock_acquire+0x163d/0x1ca0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff810a9c0c>] lock_acquire+0x9c/0x140 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179c41f>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3f/0x50 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0006dca>] tipc_link_retransmit+0x1aa/0x240 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0001e11>] tipc_bclink_rcv+0x611/0x640 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0008646>] tipc_rcv+0x616/0xac0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffffa0002ca3>] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x73/0xd0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81646e66>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x746/0x980 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff816470c1>] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x70 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647295>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x35/0x130 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81648218>] napi_gro_receive+0x158/0x1d0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81559e05>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x155/0x490 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8155c1b7>] e1000_clean+0x267/0x990 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81647b60>] net_rx_action+0x150/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105ec43>] __do_softirq+0x123/0x360 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8105f12e>] irq_exit+0x8e/0xb0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179f9f5>] do_IRQ+0x65/0x110 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8179da6f>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x13 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8100de9f>] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff8109dfa6>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2f6/0x3f0 [ 60.992174] [<ffffffff81033cda>] start_secondary+0x13a/0x150 [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] other info that might help us debug this: [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] CPU0 CPU1 [ 60.992174] ---- ---- [ 60.992174] lock(&(&bclink->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] lock(&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] lock(&(&bclink->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] lock(&(&n_ptr->lock)->rlock); [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 60.992174] [ 60.992174] 3 locks held by swapper/3/0: [ 60.992174] #0: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff81646791>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x71/0x980 [ 60.992174] #1: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa0002c35>] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x5/0xd0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] #2: (&(&bclink->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa00004be>] tipc_bclink_lock+0x8e/0xa0 [tipc] [ 60.992174] The correct the sequence of grabbing n_ptr->lock and bclink->lock should be that the former is first held and the latter is then taken, which exactly happened on CPU1. But especially when the retransmission of broadcast link is failed, bclink->lock is first held in tipc_bclink_rcv(), and n_ptr->lock is taken in link_retransmit_failure() called by tipc_link_retransmit() subsequently, which is demonstrated on CPU0. As a result, deadlock occurs. If the order of holding the two locks happening on CPU0 is reversed, the deadlock risk will be relieved. Therefore, the node lock taken in link_retransmit_failure() originally is moved to tipc_bclink_rcv() so that it's obtained before bclink lock. But the precondition of the adjustment of node lock is that responding to bclink reset event must be moved from tipc_bclink_unlock() to tipc_node_unlock(). Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-03-26 17:10:23 +07:00
if (flags & TIPC_BCAST_RESET)
tipc_node_reset_links(node);
}
/* Caller should hold node lock for the passed node */
static int __tipc_nl_add_node(struct tipc_nl_msg *msg, struct tipc_node *node)
{
void *hdr;
struct nlattr *attrs;
hdr = genlmsg_put(msg->skb, msg->portid, msg->seq, &tipc_genl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, TIPC_NL_NODE_GET);
if (!hdr)
return -EMSGSIZE;
attrs = nla_nest_start(msg->skb, TIPC_NLA_NODE);
if (!attrs)
goto msg_full;
if (nla_put_u32(msg->skb, TIPC_NLA_NODE_ADDR, node->addr))
goto attr_msg_full;
if (tipc_node_is_up(node))
if (nla_put_flag(msg->skb, TIPC_NLA_NODE_UP))
goto attr_msg_full;
nla_nest_end(msg->skb, attrs);
genlmsg_end(msg->skb, hdr);
return 0;
attr_msg_full:
nla_nest_cancel(msg->skb, attrs);
msg_full:
genlmsg_cancel(msg->skb, hdr);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static struct tipc_link *tipc_node_select_link(struct tipc_node *n, int sel,
int *bearer_id,
struct tipc_media_addr **maddr)
{
int id = n->active_links[sel & 1];
if (unlikely(id < 0))
return NULL;
*bearer_id = id;
*maddr = &n->links[id].maddr;
return n->links[id].link;
}
/**
* tipc_node_xmit() is the general link level function for message sending
* @net: the applicable net namespace
* @list: chain of buffers containing message
* @dnode: address of destination node
* @selector: a number used for deterministic link selection
* Consumes the buffer chain, except when returning -ELINKCONG
* Returns 0 if success, otherwise errno: -ELINKCONG,-EHOSTUNREACH,-EMSGSIZE
*/
int tipc_node_xmit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list,
u32 dnode, int selector)
{
struct tipc_link *l = NULL;
struct tipc_node *n;
struct sk_buff_head xmitq;
struct tipc_media_addr *maddr;
int bearer_id;
int rc = -EHOSTUNREACH;
__skb_queue_head_init(&xmitq);
n = tipc_node_find(net, dnode);
if (likely(n)) {
tipc_node_lock(n);
l = tipc_node_select_link(n, selector, &bearer_id, &maddr);
if (likely(l))
rc = tipc_link_xmit(l, list, &xmitq);
if (unlikely(rc == -ENOBUFS))
tipc_node_link_down(n, bearer_id);
tipc_node_unlock(n);
tipc_node_put(n);
}
if (likely(!rc)) {
tipc_bearer_xmit(net, bearer_id, &xmitq, maddr);
return 0;
}
if (likely(in_own_node(net, dnode))) {
tipc_sk_rcv(net, list);
return 0;
}
return rc;
}
/* tipc_node_xmit_skb(): send single buffer to destination
* Buffers sent via this functon are generally TIPC_SYSTEM_IMPORTANCE
* messages, which will not be rejected
* The only exception is datagram messages rerouted after secondary
* lookup, which are rare and safe to dispose of anyway.
* TODO: Return real return value, and let callers use
* tipc_wait_for_sendpkt() where applicable
*/
int tipc_node_xmit_skb(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 dnode,
u32 selector)
{
struct sk_buff_head head;
int rc;
skb_queue_head_init(&head);
__skb_queue_tail(&head, skb);
rc = tipc_node_xmit(net, &head, dnode, selector);
if (rc == -ELINKCONG)
kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
}
/**
* tipc_node_check_state - check and if necessary update node state
* @skb: TIPC packet
* @bearer_id: identity of bearer delivering the packet
* Returns true if state is ok, otherwise consumes buffer and returns false
*/
static bool tipc_node_check_state(struct tipc_node *n, struct sk_buff *skb,
int bearer_id)
{
struct tipc_msg *hdr = buf_msg(skb);
int usr = msg_user(hdr);
int mtyp = msg_type(hdr);
u16 oseqno = msg_seqno(hdr);
u16 iseqno = msg_seqno(msg_get_wrapped(hdr));
u16 exp_pkts = msg_msgcnt(hdr);
u16 rcv_nxt, syncpt, dlv_nxt;
int state = n->state;
struct tipc_link *l, *pl = NULL;
struct sk_buff_head;
int i;
l = n->links[bearer_id].link;
if (!l)
return false;
rcv_nxt = l->rcv_nxt;
if (likely((state == SELF_UP_PEER_UP) && (usr != TUNNEL_PROTOCOL)))
return true;
/* Find parallel link, if any */
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BEARERS; i++) {
if ((i != bearer_id) && n->links[i].link) {
pl = n->links[i].link;
break;
}
}
/* Update node accesibility if applicable */
if (state == SELF_UP_PEER_COMING) {
if (!tipc_link_is_up(l))
return true;
if (!msg_peer_link_is_up(hdr))
return true;
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n, PEER_ESTABL_CONTACT_EVT);
}
if (state == SELF_DOWN_PEER_LEAVING) {
if (msg_peer_node_is_up(hdr))
return false;
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n, PEER_LOST_CONTACT_EVT);
}
/* Ignore duplicate packets */
if (less(oseqno, rcv_nxt))
return true;
/* Initiate or update failover mode if applicable */
if ((usr == TUNNEL_PROTOCOL) && (mtyp == FAILOVER_MSG)) {
syncpt = oseqno + exp_pkts - 1;
if (pl && tipc_link_is_up(pl)) {
tipc_node_link_down(n, pl->bearer_id);
pl->exec_mode = TIPC_LINK_BLOCKED;
}
/* If pkts arrive out of order, use lowest calculated syncpt */
if (less(syncpt, n->sync_point))
n->sync_point = syncpt;
}
/* Open parallel link when tunnel link reaches synch point */
if ((n->state == NODE_FAILINGOVER) && (more(rcv_nxt, n->sync_point))) {
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n, NODE_FAILOVER_END_EVT);
if (pl)
pl->exec_mode = TIPC_LINK_OPEN;
return true;
}
/* Initiate or update synch mode if applicable */
if ((usr == TUNNEL_PROTOCOL) && (mtyp == SYNCH_MSG)) {
syncpt = iseqno + exp_pkts - 1;
if (n->state == SELF_UP_PEER_UP) {
n->sync_point = syncpt;
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n, NODE_SYNCH_BEGIN_EVT);
}
l->exec_mode = TIPC_LINK_TUNNEL;
if (less(syncpt, n->sync_point))
n->sync_point = syncpt;
}
/* Open tunnel link when parallel link reaches synch point */
if ((n->state == NODE_SYNCHING) && (l->exec_mode == TIPC_LINK_TUNNEL)) {
if (pl)
dlv_nxt = mod(pl->rcv_nxt - skb_queue_len(pl->inputq));
if (!pl || more(dlv_nxt, n->sync_point)) {
tipc_node_fsm_evt(n, NODE_SYNCH_END_EVT);
l->exec_mode = TIPC_LINK_OPEN;
return true;
}
if ((usr == TUNNEL_PROTOCOL) && (mtyp == SYNCH_MSG))
return true;
if (usr == LINK_PROTOCOL)
return true;
return false;
}
return true;
}
/**
* tipc_rcv - process TIPC packets/messages arriving from off-node
* @net: the applicable net namespace
* @skb: TIPC packet
* @bearer: pointer to bearer message arrived on
*
* Invoked with no locks held. Bearer pointer must point to a valid bearer
* structure (i.e. cannot be NULL), but bearer can be inactive.
*/
void tipc_rcv(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, struct tipc_bearer *b)
{
struct sk_buff_head xmitq;
struct tipc_node *n;
struct tipc_msg *hdr = buf_msg(skb);
int usr = msg_user(hdr);
int bearer_id = b->identity;
struct tipc_link_entry *le;
int rc = 0;
__skb_queue_head_init(&xmitq);
/* Ensure message is well-formed */
if (unlikely(!tipc_msg_validate(skb)))
goto discard;
/* Handle arrival of a non-unicast link packet */
if (unlikely(msg_non_seq(hdr))) {
if (usr == LINK_CONFIG)
tipc_disc_rcv(net, skb, b);
else
tipc_bclink_rcv(net, skb);
return;
}
/* Locate neighboring node that sent packet */
n = tipc_node_find(net, msg_prevnode(hdr));
if (unlikely(!n))
goto discard;
le = &n->links[bearer_id];
tipc_node_lock(n);
/* Is reception permitted at the moment ? */
if (!tipc_node_filter_pkt(n, hdr))
goto unlock;
if (unlikely(msg_user(hdr) == LINK_PROTOCOL))
tipc_bclink_sync_state(n, hdr);
/* Release acked broadcast messages */
if (unlikely(n->bclink.acked != msg_bcast_ack(hdr)))
tipc_bclink_acknowledge(n, msg_bcast_ack(hdr));
/* Check and if necessary update node state */
if (likely(tipc_node_check_state(n, skb, bearer_id))) {
rc = tipc_link_rcv(le->link, skb, &xmitq);
skb = NULL;
}
if (unlikely(rc & TIPC_LINK_UP_EVT))
tipc_node_link_up(n, bearer_id, &xmitq);
if (unlikely(rc & TIPC_LINK_DOWN_EVT))
tipc_node_link_down(n, bearer_id);
unlock:
tipc_node_unlock(n);
if (!skb_queue_empty(&le->inputq))
tipc_sk_rcv(net, &le->inputq);
if (!skb_queue_empty(&xmitq))
tipc_bearer_xmit(net, bearer_id, &xmitq, &le->maddr);
tipc_node_put(n);
discard:
kfree_skb(skb);
}
int tipc_nl_node_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
int err;
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(net, tipc_net_id);
int done = cb->args[0];
int last_addr = cb->args[1];
struct tipc_node *node;
struct tipc_nl_msg msg;
if (done)
return 0;
msg.skb = skb;
msg.portid = NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid;
msg.seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
rcu_read_lock();
if (last_addr) {
node = tipc_node_find(net, last_addr);
if (!node) {
rcu_read_unlock();
/* We never set seq or call nl_dump_check_consistent()
* this means that setting prev_seq here will cause the
* consistence check to fail in the netlink callback
* handler. Resulting in the NLMSG_DONE message having
* the NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag set if the node state
* changed while we released the lock.
*/
cb->prev_seq = 1;
return -EPIPE;
}
tipc_node_put(node);
}
list_for_each_entry_rcu(node, &tn->node_list, list) {
if (last_addr) {
if (node->addr == last_addr)
last_addr = 0;
else
continue;
}
tipc_node_lock(node);
err = __tipc_nl_add_node(&msg, node);
if (err) {
last_addr = node->addr;
tipc_node_unlock(node);
goto out;
}
tipc_node_unlock(node);
}
done = 1;
out:
cb->args[0] = done;
cb->args[1] = last_addr;
rcu_read_unlock();
return skb->len;
}