linux_dsm_epyc7002/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c

1030 lines
23 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
/*
* DA8XX/OMAP L1XX platform device data
*
* Copyright (c) 2007-2009, MontaVista Software, Inc. <source@mvista.com>
* Derived from code that was:
* Copyright (C) 2006 Komal Shah <komal_shah802003@yahoo.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
#include <linux/serial_8250.h>
#include <linux/ahci_platform.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
#include <mach/cputype.h>
#include <mach/common.h>
#include <mach/time.h>
#include <mach/da8xx.h>
#include <mach/cpuidle.h>
#include <mach/sram.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
#include "clock.h"
#include "asp.h"
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
#define DA8XX_TPCC_BASE 0x01c00000
#define DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE 0x01c08000
#define DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE 0x01c08400
#define DA8XX_WDOG_BASE 0x01c21000 /* DA8XX_TIMER64P1_BASE */
#define DA8XX_I2C0_BASE 0x01c22000
#define DA8XX_RTC_BASE 0x01c23000
#define DA8XX_PRUSS_MEM_BASE 0x01c30000
#define DA8XX_MMCSD0_BASE 0x01c40000
#define DA8XX_SPI0_BASE 0x01c41000
#define DA830_SPI1_BASE 0x01e12000
#define DA8XX_LCD_CNTRL_BASE 0x01e13000
#define DA850_SATA_BASE 0x01e18000
#define DA850_MMCSD1_BASE 0x01e1b000
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
#define DA8XX_EMAC_CPPI_PORT_BASE 0x01e20000
#define DA8XX_EMAC_CPGMACSS_BASE 0x01e22000
#define DA8XX_EMAC_CPGMAC_BASE 0x01e23000
#define DA8XX_EMAC_MDIO_BASE 0x01e24000
#define DA8XX_I2C1_BASE 0x01e28000
#define DA850_TPCC1_BASE 0x01e30000
#define DA850_TPTC2_BASE 0x01e38000
#define DA850_SPI1_BASE 0x01f0e000
#define DA8XX_DDR2_CTL_BASE 0xb0000000
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
#define DA8XX_EMAC_CTRL_REG_OFFSET 0x3000
#define DA8XX_EMAC_MOD_REG_OFFSET 0x2000
#define DA8XX_EMAC_RAM_OFFSET 0x0000
#define DA8XX_EMAC_CTRL_RAM_SIZE SZ_8K
#define DA8XX_DMA_SPI0_RX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 14)
#define DA8XX_DMA_SPI0_TX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 15)
#define DA8XX_DMA_MMCSD0_RX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 16)
#define DA8XX_DMA_MMCSD0_TX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 17)
#define DA8XX_DMA_SPI1_RX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 18)
#define DA8XX_DMA_SPI1_TX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 19)
#define DA850_DMA_MMCSD1_RX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(1, 28)
#define DA850_DMA_MMCSD1_TX EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(1, 29)
void __iomem *da8xx_syscfg0_base;
void __iomem *da8xx_syscfg1_base;
static struct plat_serial8250_port da8xx_serial0_pdata[] = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
{
.mapbase = DA8XX_UART0_BASE,
.irq = IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT0,
.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | UPF_SKIP_TEST |
UPF_IOREMAP,
.iotype = UPIO_MEM,
.regshift = 2,
},
{
.flags = 0,
}
};
static struct plat_serial8250_port da8xx_serial1_pdata[] = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
{
.mapbase = DA8XX_UART1_BASE,
.irq = IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT1,
.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | UPF_SKIP_TEST |
UPF_IOREMAP,
.iotype = UPIO_MEM,
.regshift = 2,
},
{
.flags = 0,
}
};
static struct plat_serial8250_port da8xx_serial2_pdata[] = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
{
.mapbase = DA8XX_UART2_BASE,
.irq = IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT2,
.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | UPF_SKIP_TEST |
UPF_IOREMAP,
.iotype = UPIO_MEM,
.regshift = 2,
},
{
.flags = 0,
}
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
};
struct platform_device da8xx_serial_device[] = {
{
.name = "serial8250",
.id = PLAT8250_DEV_PLATFORM,
.dev = {
.platform_data = da8xx_serial0_pdata,
}
},
{
.name = "serial8250",
.id = PLAT8250_DEV_PLATFORM1,
.dev = {
.platform_data = da8xx_serial1_pdata,
}
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
},
{
.name = "serial8250",
.id = PLAT8250_DEV_PLATFORM2,
.dev = {
.platform_data = da8xx_serial2_pdata,
}
},
{
}
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
};
static s8 da8xx_queue_priority_mapping[][2] = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
/* {event queue no, Priority} */
{0, 3},
{1, 7},
{-1, -1}
};
static s8 da850_queue_priority_mapping[][2] = {
/* {event queue no, Priority} */
{0, 3},
{-1, -1}
};
static struct edma_soc_info da830_edma_cc0_info = {
.queue_priority_mapping = da8xx_queue_priority_mapping,
.default_queue = EVENTQ_1,
};
static struct edma_soc_info *da830_edma_info[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {
&da830_edma_cc0_info,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
};
static struct edma_soc_info da850_edma_cc_info[] = {
{
.queue_priority_mapping = da8xx_queue_priority_mapping,
.default_queue = EVENTQ_1,
},
{
.queue_priority_mapping = da850_queue_priority_mapping,
.default_queue = EVENTQ_0,
},
};
static struct edma_soc_info *da850_edma_info[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {
&da850_edma_cc_info[0],
&da850_edma_cc_info[1],
};
static struct resource da830_edma_resources[] = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
{
.name = "edma_cc0",
.start = DA8XX_TPCC_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_TPCC_BASE + SZ_32K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma_tc0",
.start = DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma_tc1",
.start = DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma0",
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_CCINT0,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.name = "edma0_err",
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_CCERRINT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct resource da850_edma_resources[] = {
{
.name = "edma_cc0",
.start = DA8XX_TPCC_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_TPCC_BASE + SZ_32K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma_tc0",
.start = DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma_tc1",
.start = DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma_cc1",
.start = DA850_TPCC1_BASE,
.end = DA850_TPCC1_BASE + SZ_32K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma_tc2",
.start = DA850_TPTC2_BASE,
.end = DA850_TPTC2_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.name = "edma0",
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_CCINT0,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.name = "edma0_err",
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_CCERRINT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.name = "edma1",
.start = IRQ_DA850_CCINT1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.name = "edma1_err",
.start = IRQ_DA850_CCERRINT1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da830_edma_device = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
.name = "edma",
.id = -1,
.dev = {
.platform_data = da830_edma_info,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
},
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_edma_resources),
.resource = da830_edma_resources,
};
static struct platform_device da850_edma_device = {
.name = "edma",
.id = -1,
.dev = {
.platform_data = da850_edma_info,
},
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da850_edma_resources),
.resource = da850_edma_resources,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
};
int __init da830_register_edma(struct edma_rsv_info *rsv)
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
{
da830_edma_cc0_info.rsv = rsv;
return platform_device_register(&da830_edma_device);
}
int __init da850_register_edma(struct edma_rsv_info *rsv[2])
{
if (rsv) {
da850_edma_cc_info[0].rsv = rsv[0];
da850_edma_cc_info[1].rsv = rsv[1];
}
return platform_device_register(&da850_edma_device);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
}
static struct resource da8xx_i2c_resources0[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_I2C0_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_I2C0_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT0,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT0,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_i2c_device0 = {
.name = "i2c_davinci",
.id = 1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_i2c_resources0),
.resource = da8xx_i2c_resources0,
};
static struct resource da8xx_i2c_resources1[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_I2C1_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_I2C1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT1,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_i2c_device1 = {
.name = "i2c_davinci",
.id = 2,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_i2c_resources1),
.resource = da8xx_i2c_resources1,
};
int __init da8xx_register_i2c(int instance,
struct davinci_i2c_platform_data *pdata)
{
struct platform_device *pdev;
if (instance == 0)
pdev = &da8xx_i2c_device0;
else if (instance == 1)
pdev = &da8xx_i2c_device1;
else
return -EINVAL;
pdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
return platform_device_register(pdev);
}
static struct resource da8xx_watchdog_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_WDOG_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_WDOG_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_wdt_device = {
.name = "davinci-wdt",
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
.id = -1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_watchdog_resources),
.resource = da8xx_watchdog_resources,
};
void da8xx_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
{
struct device *dev;
dev = bus_find_device_by_name(&platform_bus_type, NULL, "davinci-wdt");
if (!dev) {
pr_err("%s: failed to find watchdog device\n", __func__);
return;
}
davinci_watchdog_reset(to_platform_device(dev));
}
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
int __init da8xx_register_watchdog(void)
{
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_wdt_device);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
}
static struct resource da8xx_emac_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_EMAC_CPPI_PORT_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_EMAC_CPPI_PORT_BASE + SZ_16K - 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 08:36:54 +07:00
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_THRESH_PULSE,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_THRESH_PULSE,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_PULSE,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_PULSE,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_TX_PULSE,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_TX_PULSE,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_MISC_PULSE,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_C0_MISC_PULSE,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
struct emac_platform_data da8xx_emac_pdata = {
.ctrl_reg_offset = DA8XX_EMAC_CTRL_REG_OFFSET,
.ctrl_mod_reg_offset = DA8XX_EMAC_MOD_REG_OFFSET,
.ctrl_ram_offset = DA8XX_EMAC_RAM_OFFSET,
.ctrl_ram_size = DA8XX_EMAC_CTRL_RAM_SIZE,
.version = EMAC_VERSION_2,
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_emac_device = {
.name = "davinci_emac",
.id = 1,
.dev = {
.platform_data = &da8xx_emac_pdata,
},
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_emac_resources),
.resource = da8xx_emac_resources,
};
static struct resource da8xx_mdio_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_EMAC_MDIO_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_EMAC_MDIO_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_mdio_device = {
.name = "davinci_mdio",
.id = 0,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_mdio_resources),
.resource = da8xx_mdio_resources,
};
int __init da8xx_register_emac(void)
{
int ret;
ret = platform_device_register(&da8xx_mdio_device);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_emac_device);
}
static struct resource da830_mcasp1_resources[] = {
{
.name = "mpu",
.start = DAVINCI_DA830_MCASP1_REG_BASE,
.end = DAVINCI_DA830_MCASP1_REG_BASE + (SZ_1K * 12) - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
/* TX event */
{
.start = DAVINCI_DA830_DMA_MCASP1_AXEVT,
.end = DAVINCI_DA830_DMA_MCASP1_AXEVT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
/* RX event */
{
.start = DAVINCI_DA830_DMA_MCASP1_AREVT,
.end = DAVINCI_DA830_DMA_MCASP1_AREVT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
};
static struct platform_device da830_mcasp1_device = {
.name = "davinci-mcasp",
.id = 1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_mcasp1_resources),
.resource = da830_mcasp1_resources,
};
static struct resource da850_mcasp_resources[] = {
{
.name = "mpu",
.start = DAVINCI_DA8XX_MCASP0_REG_BASE,
.end = DAVINCI_DA8XX_MCASP0_REG_BASE + (SZ_1K * 12) - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
/* TX event */
{
.start = DAVINCI_DA8XX_DMA_MCASP0_AXEVT,
.end = DAVINCI_DA8XX_DMA_MCASP0_AXEVT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
/* RX event */
{
.start = DAVINCI_DA8XX_DMA_MCASP0_AREVT,
.end = DAVINCI_DA8XX_DMA_MCASP0_AREVT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
};
static struct platform_device da850_mcasp_device = {
.name = "davinci-mcasp",
.id = 0,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da850_mcasp_resources),
.resource = da850_mcasp_resources,
};
void __init da8xx_register_mcasp(int id, struct snd_platform_data *pdata)
{
/* DA830/OMAP-L137 has 3 instances of McASP */
if (cpu_is_davinci_da830() && id == 1) {
da830_mcasp1_device.dev.platform_data = pdata;
platform_device_register(&da830_mcasp1_device);
} else if (cpu_is_davinci_da850()) {
da850_mcasp_device.dev.platform_data = pdata;
platform_device_register(&da850_mcasp_device);
}
}
static struct resource da8xx_pruss_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_PRUSS_MEM_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_PRUSS_MEM_BASE + 0xFFFF,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT1,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT2,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT2,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT3,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT3,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT4,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT4,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT5,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT5,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT6,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT6,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT7,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT7,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct uio_pruss_pdata da8xx_uio_pruss_pdata = {
.pintc_base = 0x4000,
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_uio_pruss_dev = {
.name = "pruss_uio",
.id = -1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_pruss_resources),
.resource = da8xx_pruss_resources,
.dev = {
.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
.platform_data = &da8xx_uio_pruss_pdata,
}
};
int __init da8xx_register_uio_pruss(void)
{
da8xx_uio_pruss_pdata.sram_pool = sram_get_gen_pool();
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_uio_pruss_dev);
}
static struct lcd_ctrl_config lcd_cfg = {
.panel_shade = COLOR_ACTIVE,
.bpp = 16,
};
struct da8xx_lcdc_platform_data sharp_lcd035q3dg01_pdata = {
.manu_name = "sharp",
.controller_data = &lcd_cfg,
.type = "Sharp_LCD035Q3DG01",
};
struct da8xx_lcdc_platform_data sharp_lk043t1dg01_pdata = {
.manu_name = "sharp",
.controller_data = &lcd_cfg,
.type = "Sharp_LK043T1DG01",
};
static struct resource da8xx_lcdc_resources[] = {
[0] = { /* registers */
.start = DA8XX_LCD_CNTRL_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_LCD_CNTRL_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
[1] = { /* interrupt */
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_LCDINT,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_LCDINT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_lcdc_device = {
.name = "da8xx_lcdc",
.id = 0,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_lcdc_resources),
.resource = da8xx_lcdc_resources,
};
int __init da8xx_register_lcdc(struct da8xx_lcdc_platform_data *pdata)
{
da8xx_lcdc_device.dev.platform_data = pdata;
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_lcdc_device);
}
static struct resource da8xx_gpio_resources[] = {
{ /* registers */
.start = DA8XX_GPIO_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_GPIO_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{ /* interrupt */
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO0,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO8,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_gpio_device = {
.name = "davinci_gpio",
.id = -1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_gpio_resources),
.resource = da8xx_gpio_resources,
};
int __init da8xx_register_gpio(void *pdata)
{
da8xx_gpio_device.dev.platform_data = pdata;
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_gpio_device);
}
static struct resource da8xx_mmcsd0_resources[] = {
{ /* registers */
.start = DA8XX_MMCSD0_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_MMCSD0_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{ /* interrupt */
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_MMCSDINT0,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_MMCSDINT0,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{ /* DMA RX */
.start = DA8XX_DMA_MMCSD0_RX,
.end = DA8XX_DMA_MMCSD0_RX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
{ /* DMA TX */
.start = DA8XX_DMA_MMCSD0_TX,
.end = DA8XX_DMA_MMCSD0_TX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_mmcsd0_device = {
.name = "da830-mmc",
.id = 0,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_mmcsd0_resources),
.resource = da8xx_mmcsd0_resources,
};
int __init da8xx_register_mmcsd0(struct davinci_mmc_config *config)
{
da8xx_mmcsd0_device.dev.platform_data = config;
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_mmcsd0_device);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
static struct resource da850_mmcsd1_resources[] = {
{ /* registers */
.start = DA850_MMCSD1_BASE,
.end = DA850_MMCSD1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{ /* interrupt */
.start = IRQ_DA850_MMCSDINT0_1,
.end = IRQ_DA850_MMCSDINT0_1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{ /* DMA RX */
.start = DA850_DMA_MMCSD1_RX,
.end = DA850_DMA_MMCSD1_RX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
{ /* DMA TX */
.start = DA850_DMA_MMCSD1_TX,
.end = DA850_DMA_MMCSD1_TX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
};
static struct platform_device da850_mmcsd1_device = {
.name = "da830-mmc",
.id = 1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da850_mmcsd1_resources),
.resource = da850_mmcsd1_resources,
};
int __init da850_register_mmcsd1(struct davinci_mmc_config *config)
{
da850_mmcsd1_device.dev.platform_data = config;
return platform_device_register(&da850_mmcsd1_device);
}
#endif
static struct resource da8xx_rproc_resources[] = {
{ /* DSP boot address */
.start = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_HOST1CFG_REG,
.end = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_HOST1CFG_REG + 3,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{ /* DSP interrupt registers */
.start = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_CHIPSIG_REG,
.end = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_CHIPSIG_REG + 7,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{ /* dsp irq */
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT0,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT0,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_dsp = {
.name = "davinci-rproc",
.dev = {
.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
},
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_rproc_resources),
.resource = da8xx_rproc_resources,
};
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DA8XX_REMOTEPROC)
static phys_addr_t rproc_base __initdata;
static unsigned long rproc_size __initdata;
static int __init early_rproc_mem(char *p)
{
char *endp;
if (p == NULL)
return 0;
rproc_size = memparse(p, &endp);
if (*endp == '@')
rproc_base = memparse(endp + 1, NULL);
return 0;
}
early_param("rproc_mem", early_rproc_mem);
void __init da8xx_rproc_reserve_cma(void)
{
int ret;
if (!rproc_base || !rproc_size) {
pr_err("%s: 'rproc_mem=nn@address' badly specified\n"
" 'nn' and 'address' must both be non-zero\n",
__func__);
return;
}
pr_info("%s: reserving 0x%lx @ 0x%lx...\n",
__func__, rproc_size, (unsigned long)rproc_base);
ret = dma_declare_contiguous(&da8xx_dsp.dev, rproc_size, rproc_base, 0);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: dma_declare_contiguous failed %d\n", __func__, ret);
}
#else
void __init da8xx_rproc_reserve_cma(void)
{
}
#endif
int __init da8xx_register_rproc(void)
{
int ret;
ret = platform_device_register(&da8xx_dsp);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: can't register DSP device: %d\n", __func__, ret);
return ret;
};
static struct resource da8xx_rtc_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_RTC_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_RTC_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{ /* timer irq */
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
{ /* alarm irq */
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_rtc_device = {
.name = "da830-rtc",
.id = -1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_rtc_resources),
.resource = da8xx_rtc_resources,
};
int da8xx_register_rtc(void)
{
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_rtc_device);
}
static void __iomem *da8xx_ddr2_ctlr_base;
void __iomem * __init da8xx_get_mem_ctlr(void)
{
if (da8xx_ddr2_ctlr_base)
return da8xx_ddr2_ctlr_base;
da8xx_ddr2_ctlr_base = ioremap(DA8XX_DDR2_CTL_BASE, SZ_32K);
if (!da8xx_ddr2_ctlr_base)
pr_warn("%s: Unable to map DDR2 controller", __func__);
return da8xx_ddr2_ctlr_base;
}
static struct resource da8xx_cpuidle_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_DDR2_CTL_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_DDR2_CTL_BASE + SZ_32K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
};
/* DA8XX devices support DDR2 power down */
static struct davinci_cpuidle_config da8xx_cpuidle_pdata = {
.ddr2_pdown = 1,
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_cpuidle_device = {
.name = "cpuidle-davinci",
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_cpuidle_resources),
.resource = da8xx_cpuidle_resources,
.dev = {
.platform_data = &da8xx_cpuidle_pdata,
},
};
int __init da8xx_register_cpuidle(void)
{
da8xx_cpuidle_pdata.ddr2_ctlr_base = da8xx_get_mem_ctlr();
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_cpuidle_device);
}
static struct resource da8xx_spi0_resources[] = {
[0] = {
.start = DA8XX_SPI0_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_SPI0_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
[1] = {
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT0,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT0,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
[2] = {
.start = DA8XX_DMA_SPI0_RX,
.end = DA8XX_DMA_SPI0_RX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
[3] = {
.start = DA8XX_DMA_SPI0_TX,
.end = DA8XX_DMA_SPI0_TX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
};
static struct resource da8xx_spi1_resources[] = {
[0] = {
.start = DA830_SPI1_BASE,
.end = DA830_SPI1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
[1] = {
.start = IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT1,
.end = IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
[2] = {
.start = DA8XX_DMA_SPI1_RX,
.end = DA8XX_DMA_SPI1_RX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
[3] = {
.start = DA8XX_DMA_SPI1_TX,
.end = DA8XX_DMA_SPI1_TX,
.flags = IORESOURCE_DMA,
},
};
static struct davinci_spi_platform_data da8xx_spi_pdata[] = {
[0] = {
.version = SPI_VERSION_2,
.intr_line = 1,
.dma_event_q = EVENTQ_0,
},
[1] = {
.version = SPI_VERSION_2,
.intr_line = 1,
.dma_event_q = EVENTQ_0,
},
};
static struct platform_device da8xx_spi_device[] = {
[0] = {
.name = "spi_davinci",
.id = 0,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_spi0_resources),
.resource = da8xx_spi0_resources,
.dev = {
.platform_data = &da8xx_spi_pdata[0],
},
},
[1] = {
.name = "spi_davinci",
.id = 1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_spi1_resources),
.resource = da8xx_spi1_resources,
.dev = {
.platform_data = &da8xx_spi_pdata[1],
},
},
};
int __init da8xx_register_spi_bus(int instance, unsigned num_chipselect)
{
if (instance < 0 || instance > 1)
return -EINVAL;
da8xx_spi_pdata[instance].num_chipselect = num_chipselect;
if (instance == 1 && cpu_is_davinci_da850()) {
da8xx_spi1_resources[0].start = DA850_SPI1_BASE;
da8xx_spi1_resources[0].end = DA850_SPI1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1;
}
return platform_device_register(&da8xx_spi_device[instance]);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
static struct resource da850_sata_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA850_SATA_BASE,
.end = DA850_SATA_BASE + 0x1fff,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.start = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE + DA8XX_PWRDN_REG,
.end = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE + DA8XX_PWRDN_REG + 0x3,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
.start = IRQ_DA850_SATAINT,
.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
},
};
static u64 da850_sata_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
static struct platform_device da850_sata_device = {
.name = "ahci_da850",
.id = -1,
.dev = {
.dma_mask = &da850_sata_dmamask,
.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
},
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da850_sata_resources),
.resource = da850_sata_resources,
};
int __init da850_register_sata(unsigned long refclkpn)
{
/* please see comment in drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c */
BUG_ON(refclkpn != 100 * 1000 * 1000);
return platform_device_register(&da850_sata_device);
}
#endif