2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
|
|
|
|
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
|
|
|
|
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
|
|
|
|
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
|
|
|
|
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
|
|
|
|
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
|
|
|
|
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
|
|
|
|
* Software.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
|
|
|
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
|
|
|
|
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
|
|
|
|
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
|
|
|
|
* DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* DOC: Panel Self Refresh (PSR/SRD)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Since Haswell Display controller supports Panel Self-Refresh on display
|
|
|
|
* panels witch have a remote frame buffer (RFB) implemented according to PSR
|
|
|
|
* spec in eDP1.3. PSR feature allows the display to go to lower standby states
|
|
|
|
* when system is idle but display is on as it eliminates display refresh
|
|
|
|
* request to DDR memory completely as long as the frame buffer for that
|
|
|
|
* display is unchanged.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Panel Self Refresh must be supported by both Hardware (source) and
|
|
|
|
* Panel (sink).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* PSR saves power by caching the framebuffer in the panel RFB, which allows us
|
|
|
|
* to power down the link and memory controller. For DSI panels the same idea
|
|
|
|
* is called "manual mode".
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The implementation uses the hardware-based PSR support which automatically
|
|
|
|
* enters/exits self-refresh mode. The hardware takes care of sending the
|
|
|
|
* required DP aux message and could even retrain the link (that part isn't
|
|
|
|
* enabled yet though). The hardware also keeps track of any frontbuffer
|
|
|
|
* changes to know when to exit self-refresh mode again. Unfortunately that
|
|
|
|
* part doesn't work too well, hence why the i915 PSR support uses the
|
|
|
|
* software frontbuffer tracking to make sure it doesn't miss a screen
|
|
|
|
* update. For this integration intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush()
|
|
|
|
* get called by the frontbuffer tracking code. Note that because of locking
|
|
|
|
* issues the self-refresh re-enable code is done from a work queue, which
|
|
|
|
* must be correctly synchronized/cancelled when shutting down the pipe."
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
#include <drm/drmP.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "intel_drv.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "i915_drv.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool is_edp_psr(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static bool vlv_is_psr_active_on_pipe(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
uint32_t val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe)) &
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_CURR_STATE_MASK;
|
|
|
|
return (val == VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_NORFB_UP) ||
|
|
|
|
(val == VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_SF_UPDATE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
static void intel_psr_write_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
|
2015-09-19 00:03:37 +07:00
|
|
|
const struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc_psr)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(dig_port->base.base.crtc);
|
2015-09-19 00:03:37 +07:00
|
|
|
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
|
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 20:33:26 +07:00
|
|
|
i915_reg_t ctl_reg = HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
uint32_t *data = (uint32_t *) vsc_psr;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* As per BSPec (Pipe Video Data Island Packet), we need to disable
|
|
|
|
the video DIP being updated before program video DIP data buffer
|
|
|
|
registers for DIP being updated. */
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(ctl_reg, 0);
|
|
|
|
POSTING_READ(ctl_reg);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-19 00:03:37 +07:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*vsc_psr); i += 4) {
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA(cpu_transcoder,
|
|
|
|
i >> 2), *data);
|
|
|
|
data++;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-09-19 00:03:37 +07:00
|
|
|
for (; i < VIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA_SIZE; i += 4)
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA(cpu_transcoder,
|
|
|
|
i >> 2), 0);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(ctl_reg, VIDEO_DIP_ENABLE_VSC_HSW);
|
|
|
|
POSTING_READ(ctl_reg);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void vlv_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc = intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* VLV auto-generate VSC package as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(VLV_VSCSDP(pipe));
|
|
|
|
val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_SDP_FREQ_MASK;
|
|
|
|
val |= VLV_EDP_PSR_SDP_FREQ_EVFRAME;
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(VLV_VSCSDP(pipe), val);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
static void skl_psr_setup_su_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;
|
2017-01-02 18:30:55 +07:00
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Prepare VSC Header for SU as per EDP 1.4 spec, Table 6.11 */
|
|
|
|
memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
|
2017-01-02 18:30:55 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support &&
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x5;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x13;
|
|
|
|
} else if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x4;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xe;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xc;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
intel_psr_write_vsc(intel_dp, &psr_vsc);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
|
|
|
|
memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x2;
|
|
|
|
psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x8;
|
|
|
|
intel_psr_write_vsc(intel_dp, &psr_vsc);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void vlv_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
|
2015-03-27 18:51:32 +07:00
|
|
|
DP_PSR_ENABLE | DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 20:33:26 +07:00
|
|
|
static i915_reg_t psr_aux_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
enum port port)
|
2015-11-12 01:34:16 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 9)
|
|
|
|
return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(port);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 20:33:26 +07:00
|
|
|
static i915_reg_t psr_aux_data_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
enum port port, int index)
|
2015-11-12 01:34:16 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 9)
|
|
|
|
return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(port, index);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA(index);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
uint32_t aux_clock_divider;
|
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 20:33:26 +07:00
|
|
|
i915_reg_t aux_ctl_reg;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
static const uint8_t aux_msg[] = {
|
|
|
|
[0] = DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE << 4,
|
|
|
|
[1] = DP_SET_POWER >> 8,
|
|
|
|
[2] = DP_SET_POWER & 0xff,
|
|
|
|
[3] = 1 - 1,
|
|
|
|
[4] = DP_SET_POWER_D0,
|
|
|
|
};
|
2015-11-12 01:34:12 +07:00
|
|
|
enum port port = dig_port->port;
|
2016-05-18 23:47:15 +07:00
|
|
|
u32 aux_ctl;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(aux_msg) > 20);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aux_clock_divider = intel_dp->get_aux_clock_divider(intel_dp, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Enable AUX frame sync at sink */
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.aux_frame_sync)
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
|
|
|
|
DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CONF,
|
|
|
|
DP_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_ENABLE);
|
2017-01-02 18:30:58 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Enable ALPM at sink for psr2 */
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support && dev_priv->psr.alpm)
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
|
|
|
|
DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CONFIG,
|
|
|
|
DP_ALPM_ENABLE);
|
2016-05-18 23:47:14 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
|
|
|
|
DP_PSR_ENABLE | DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
|
|
|
|
DP_PSR_ENABLE);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-12 01:34:16 +07:00
|
|
|
aux_ctl_reg = psr_aux_ctl_reg(dev_priv, port);
|
2015-01-22 16:00:54 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Setup AUX registers */
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(aux_msg); i += 4)
|
2015-11-12 01:34:16 +07:00
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(psr_aux_data_reg(dev_priv, port, i >> 2),
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
intel_dp_pack_aux(&aux_msg[i], sizeof(aux_msg) - i));
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-18 23:47:15 +07:00
|
|
|
aux_ctl = intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl(intel_dp, 0, sizeof(aux_msg),
|
|
|
|
aux_clock_divider);
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg, aux_ctl);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void vlv_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc = dig_port->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Transition from PSR_state 0 to PSR_state 1, i.e. PSR Inactive */
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe),
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_MODE_SW_TIMER |
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_SRC_TRANSMITTER_STATE |
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
static void vlv_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc = dig_port->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Let's do the transition from PSR_state 1 to PSR_state 2
|
|
|
|
* that is PSR transition to active - static frame transmission.
|
|
|
|
* Then Hardware is responsible for the transition to PSR_state 3
|
|
|
|
* that is PSR active - no Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) update.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe), I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe)) |
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
uint32_t max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
|
2016-09-08 07:42:31 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Let's respect VBT in case VBT asks a higher idle_frame value.
|
|
|
|
* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including
|
|
|
|
* the off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases. Also there are
|
|
|
|
* cases where sink should be able to train
|
|
|
|
* with the 5 or 6 idle patterns.
|
2014-11-14 23:52:31 +07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-09-08 07:42:31 +07:00
|
|
|
uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
|
2016-05-18 23:47:11 +07:00
|
|
|
uint32_t val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
|
2015-12-12 07:31:31 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-10-13 17:03:01 +07:00
|
|
|
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
|
2015-12-12 07:31:31 +07:00
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-02 03:02:07 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-18 23:47:11 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 5)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
|
|
|
|
else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 1)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_500us;
|
|
|
|
else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 0)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us;
|
|
|
|
else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 1)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us;
|
|
|
|
else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 0)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(intel_dp) &&
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_tps3_supported(intel_dp->dpcd))
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-05-18 23:47:11 +07:00
|
|
|
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
static void intel_enable_source_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Let's respect VBT in case VBT asks a higher idle_frame value.
|
|
|
|
* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including
|
|
|
|
* the off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases. Also there are
|
|
|
|
* cases where sink should be able to train
|
|
|
|
* with the 5 or 6 idle patterns.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
|
|
|
|
uint32_t val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val = idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
|
2016-05-18 23:47:11 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: selective update is probably totally broken because it doesn't
|
|
|
|
* mesh at all with our frontbuffer tracking. And the hw alone isn't
|
|
|
|
* good enough. */
|
2017-01-13 07:31:24 +07:00
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR2_ENABLE |
|
|
|
|
EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE |
|
|
|
|
EDP_FRAMES_BEFORE_SU_ENTRY;
|
2016-05-18 23:47:11 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_2500;
|
|
|
|
else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 1)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_500;
|
|
|
|
else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 0)
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_100;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_50;
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-18 23:47:11 +07:00
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive.*/
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
|
|
|
|
intel_enable_source_psr2(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
intel_enable_source_psr1(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc = dig_port->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
|
2016-05-18 15:34:38 +07:00
|
|
|
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
|
|
|
|
&intel_crtc->config->base.adjusted_mode;
|
|
|
|
int psr_setup_time;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!drm_modeset_is_locked(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex));
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!drm_modeset_is_locked(&crtc->mutex));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.source_ok = false;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-02 03:02:06 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
|
|
|
|
* BDW+ platforms with DDI implementation of PSR have different
|
|
|
|
* PSR registers per transcoder and we only implement transcoder EDP
|
|
|
|
* ones. Since by Display design transcoder EDP is tied to port A
|
|
|
|
* we can safely escape based on the port A.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-10-13 17:02:52 +07:00
|
|
|
if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv) && dig_port->port != PORT_A) {
|
2016-02-02 03:02:06 +07:00
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Port not supported\n");
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!i915.enable_psr) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR disable by flag\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-14 16:13:44 +07:00
|
|
|
if ((IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) &&
|
2016-02-02 03:02:08 +07:00
|
|
|
!dev_priv->psr.link_standby) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_ERROR("PSR condition failed: Link off requested but not supported on this platform\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-13 17:03:01 +07:00
|
|
|
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) &&
|
2015-01-15 19:55:25 +07:00
|
|
|
I915_READ(HSW_STEREO_3D_CTL(intel_crtc->config->cpu_transcoder)) &
|
2015-01-13 01:14:29 +07:00
|
|
|
S3D_ENABLE) {
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Stereo 3D is Enabled\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-13 17:03:01 +07:00
|
|
|
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) &&
|
2016-05-18 15:34:38 +07:00
|
|
|
adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Interlaced is Enabled\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-18 15:34:38 +07:00
|
|
|
psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
|
|
|
|
if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup time (0x%02x)\n",
|
|
|
|
intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time) >
|
|
|
|
adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay - 1) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: PSR setup time (%d us) too long\n",
|
|
|
|
psr_setup_time);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-10 14:02:26 +07:00
|
|
|
/* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions upto 3200x2000 */
|
2017-05-25 23:43:29 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support &&
|
|
|
|
(intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_w > 3200 ||
|
|
|
|
intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_h > 2000)) {
|
2017-01-10 14:02:26 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = false;
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-01-12 05:28:30 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
|
|
|
|
* After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support && dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 disabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-01-10 14:02:26 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.source_ok = true;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(dev_priv->psr.active);
|
|
|
|
lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Enable/Re-enable PSR on the host */
|
2016-10-13 17:02:52 +07:00
|
|
|
if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
/* On HSW+ after we enable PSR on source it will activate it
|
|
|
|
* as soon as it match configure idle_frame count. So
|
|
|
|
* we just actually enable it here on activation time.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
hsw_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
vlv_psr_activate(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.active = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* intel_psr_enable - Enable PSR
|
|
|
|
* @intel_dp: Intel DP
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function can only be called after the pipe is fully trained and enabled.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2017-01-13 02:01:31 +07:00
|
|
|
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc);
|
|
|
|
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
|
|
|
|
u32 chicken;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-07 16:29:20 +07:00
|
|
|
if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv)) {
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR not supported on this platform\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!is_edp_psr(intel_dp)) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR not supported by this panel\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR already in use\n");
|
|
|
|
goto unlock;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!intel_psr_match_conditions(intel_dp))
|
|
|
|
goto unlock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-13 17:02:52 +07:00
|
|
|
if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
|
2017-01-10 14:02:26 +07:00
|
|
|
skl_psr_setup_su_vsc(intel_dp);
|
2017-01-13 02:01:31 +07:00
|
|
|
chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
|
|
|
|
chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
|
2017-01-13 07:31:24 +07:00
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP |
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* set up vsc header for psr1 */
|
|
|
|
hsw_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
|
2017-01-13 07:31:24 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP
|
|
|
|
* and HPD. also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other
|
|
|
|
* drivers that might block runtime_pm besides
|
|
|
|
* preventing other hw tracking issues now we can rely
|
|
|
|
* on frontbuffer tracking.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
|
2015-04-02 12:32:44 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Enable PSR on the panel */
|
|
|
|
hsw_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
|
2015-01-22 16:00:54 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-16 15:55:40 +07:00
|
|
|
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
|
2015-01-22 16:00:54 +07:00
|
|
|
intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
vlv_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Enable PSR on the panel */
|
|
|
|
vlv_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* On HSW+ enable_source also means go to PSR entry/active
|
|
|
|
* state as soon as idle_frame achieved and here would be
|
|
|
|
* to soon. However on VLV enable_source just enable PSR
|
|
|
|
* but let it on inactive state. So we might do this prior
|
|
|
|
* to active transition, i.e. here.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
vlv_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-12 02:37:07 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* FIXME: Activation should happen immediately since this function
|
|
|
|
* is just called after pipe is fully trained and enabled.
|
|
|
|
* However on every platform we face issues when first activation
|
|
|
|
* follows a modeset so quickly.
|
|
|
|
* - On VLV/CHV we get bank screen on first activation
|
|
|
|
* - On HSW/BDW we get a recoverable frozen screen until next
|
|
|
|
* exit-activate sequence.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-11-16 15:55:40 +07:00
|
|
|
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9)
|
2015-11-12 02:37:07 +07:00
|
|
|
schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
|
|
|
|
msecs_to_jiffies(intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay * 5));
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.enabled = intel_dp;
|
|
|
|
unlock:
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
static void vlv_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc =
|
|
|
|
to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc);
|
|
|
|
uint32_t val;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.active) {
|
|
|
|
/* Put VLV PSR back to PSR_state 0 that is PSR Disabled. */
|
2016-06-30 21:33:26 +07:00
|
|
|
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
VLV_PSRSTAT(intel_crtc->pipe),
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
1))
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
WARN(1, "PSR transition took longer than expected\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(intel_crtc->pipe));
|
|
|
|
val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY;
|
|
|
|
val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
|
|
|
|
val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_MODE_MASK;
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(intel_crtc->pipe), val);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.active = false;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(vlv_is_psr_active_on_pipe(dev, intel_crtc->pipe));
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.active) {
|
2017-01-16 20:06:22 +07:00
|
|
|
i915_reg_t psr_ctl;
|
|
|
|
u32 psr_status_mask;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-11 22:14:33 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.aux_frame_sync)
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
|
|
|
|
DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CONF,
|
|
|
|
0);
|
|
|
|
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
|
2017-01-16 20:06:22 +07:00
|
|
|
psr_ctl = EDP_PSR2_CTL;
|
|
|
|
psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(psr_ctl,
|
|
|
|
I915_READ(psr_ctl) &
|
|
|
|
~(EDP_PSR2_ENABLE | EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE));
|
|
|
|
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2017-01-16 20:06:22 +07:00
|
|
|
psr_ctl = EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL;
|
|
|
|
psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(psr_ctl,
|
|
|
|
I915_READ(psr_ctl) & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-01-16 20:06:22 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Wait till PSR is idle */
|
|
|
|
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
psr_ctl, psr_status_mask, 0,
|
|
|
|
2000))
|
|
|
|
DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.active = false;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* intel_psr_disable - Disable PSR
|
|
|
|
* @intel_dp: Intel DP
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function needs to be called before disabling pipe.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
|
2016-07-04 17:34:36 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-24 05:19:32 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Disable PSR on Source */
|
2016-10-13 17:02:52 +07:00
|
|
|
if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
hsw_psr_disable(intel_dp);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
vlv_psr_disable(intel_dp);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-24 05:19:32 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Disable PSR on Sink */
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.enabled = NULL;
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
|
|
|
|
container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work);
|
|
|
|
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable
|
|
|
|
* otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle.
|
|
|
|
* PSR might take some time to get fully disabled
|
|
|
|
* and be ready for re-enable.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-04-07 15:08:05 +07:00
|
|
|
if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
|
|
|
|
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR2_STATUS_CTL,
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
50)) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle for re-enable\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL,
|
|
|
|
EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
50)) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-06-30 21:33:28 +07:00
|
|
|
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
|
|
|
|
VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe),
|
|
|
|
VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
1)) {
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!intel_dp)
|
|
|
|
goto unlock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The delayed work can race with an invalidate hence we need to
|
|
|
|
* recheck. Since psr_flush first clears this and then reschedules we
|
|
|
|
* won't ever miss a flush when bailing out here.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
|
|
|
|
goto unlock;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:00 +07:00
|
|
|
intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
unlock:
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
static void intel_psr_exit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
|
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
|
|
|
u32 val;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.active)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
|
2017-01-11 22:14:33 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.aux_frame_sync)
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
|
|
|
|
DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CONF,
|
|
|
|
0);
|
drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2017-01-13 01:00:59 +07:00
|
|
|
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL);
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE));
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE));
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Here we do the transition from PSR_state 3 to PSR_state 5
|
|
|
|
* directly once PSR State 4 that is active with single frame
|
|
|
|
* update can be skipped. PSR_state 5 that is PSR exit then
|
|
|
|
* Hardware is responsible to transition back to PSR_state 1
|
|
|
|
* that is PSR inactive. Same state after
|
|
|
|
* vlv_edp_psr_enable_source.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY;
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe), val);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Send AUX wake up - Spec says after transitioning to PSR
|
|
|
|
* active we have to send AUX wake up by writing 01h in DPCD
|
|
|
|
* 600h of sink device.
|
|
|
|
* XXX: This might slow down the transition, but without this
|
|
|
|
* HW doesn't complete the transition to PSR_state 1 and we
|
|
|
|
* never get the screen updated.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
|
|
|
|
DP_SET_POWER_D0);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.active = false;
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-11 01:15:10 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* intel_psr_single_frame_update - Single Frame Update
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
* @dev_priv: i915 device
|
2015-06-18 15:30:27 +07:00
|
|
|
* @frontbuffer_bits: frontbuffer plane tracking bits
|
2015-04-11 01:15:10 +07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Some platforms support a single frame update feature that is used to
|
|
|
|
* send and update only one frame on Remote Frame Buffer.
|
|
|
|
* So far it is only implemented for Valleyview and Cherryview because
|
|
|
|
* hardware requires this to be done before a page flip.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
2015-06-18 15:30:27 +07:00
|
|
|
unsigned frontbuffer_bits)
|
2015-04-11 01:15:10 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe;
|
|
|
|
u32 val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Single frame update is already supported on BDW+ but it requires
|
|
|
|
* many W/A and it isn't really needed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
|
2015-04-11 01:15:10 +07:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.enabled)->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-18 15:30:27 +07:00
|
|
|
if (frontbuffer_bits & INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe)) {
|
|
|
|
val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe));
|
2015-04-11 01:15:10 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-18 15:30:27 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We need to set this bit before writing registers for a flip.
|
|
|
|
* This bit will be self-clear when it gets to the PSR active state.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe), val | VLV_EDP_PSR_SINGLE_FRAME_UPDATE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-11 01:15:10 +07:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* intel_psr_invalidate - Invalidade PSR
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
* @dev_priv: i915 device
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
* @frontbuffer_bits: frontbuffer plane tracking bits
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Since the hardware frontbuffer tracking has gaps we need to integrate
|
|
|
|
* with the software frontbuffer tracking. This function gets called every
|
|
|
|
* time frontbuffer rendering starts and a buffer gets dirtied. PSR must be
|
|
|
|
* disabled if the frontbuffer mask contains a buffer relevant to PSR.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Dirty frontbuffers relevant to PSR are tracked in busy_frontbuffer_bits."
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
2015-06-18 15:30:27 +07:00
|
|
|
unsigned frontbuffer_bits)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.enabled)->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frontbuffer_bits &= INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe);
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits |= frontbuffer_bits;
|
2015-06-18 15:30:26 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (frontbuffer_bits)
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
|
2015-06-18 15:30:26 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* intel_psr_flush - Flush PSR
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
* @dev_priv: i915 device
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
* @frontbuffer_bits: frontbuffer plane tracking bits
|
2015-07-09 06:21:31 +07:00
|
|
|
* @origin: which operation caused the flush
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Since the hardware frontbuffer tracking has gaps we need to integrate
|
|
|
|
* with the software frontbuffer tracking. This function gets called every
|
|
|
|
* time frontbuffer rendering has completed and flushed out to memory. PSR
|
|
|
|
* can be enabled again if no other frontbuffer relevant to PSR is dirty.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Dirty frontbuffers relevant to PSR are tracked in busy_frontbuffer_bits.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
2015-07-09 06:21:31 +07:00
|
|
|
unsigned frontbuffer_bits, enum fb_op_origin origin)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
|
|
|
|
enum pipe pipe;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.enabled)->base.base.crtc;
|
|
|
|
pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
|
2015-06-18 15:30:26 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frontbuffer_bits &= INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe);
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits &= ~frontbuffer_bits;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-19 02:21:12 +07:00
|
|
|
/* By definition flush = invalidate + flush */
|
|
|
|
if (frontbuffer_bits)
|
2016-08-04 22:32:38 +07:00
|
|
|
intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
|
2014-11-19 22:37:47 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
|
2015-11-12 02:37:07 +07:00
|
|
|
if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
|
|
|
|
schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
|
2015-11-12 02:37:08 +07:00
|
|
|
msecs_to_jiffies(100));
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* intel_psr_init - Init basic PSR work and mutex.
|
2016-11-29 18:48:47 +07:00
|
|
|
* @dev_priv: i915 device private
|
2014-11-14 23:52:29 +07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function is called only once at driver load to initialize basic
|
|
|
|
* PSR stuff.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-11-23 21:21:44 +07:00
|
|
|
void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-12 01:34:15 +07:00
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr_mmio_base = IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) ?
|
|
|
|
HSW_EDP_PSR_BASE : BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 03:57:44 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Per platform default: all disabled. */
|
|
|
|
if (i915.enable_psr == -1)
|
|
|
|
i915.enable_psr = 0;
|
2016-02-12 19:08:11 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-02 03:02:08 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */
|
2016-10-13 17:03:00 +07:00
|
|
|
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
|
2016-02-02 03:02:07 +07:00
|
|
|
/* HSW and BDW require workarounds that we don't implement. */
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false;
|
2016-10-14 16:13:44 +07:00
|
|
|
else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
|
2016-02-02 03:02:07 +07:00
|
|
|
/* On VLV and CHV only standby mode is supported. */
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.link_standby = true;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
/* For new platforms let's respect VBT back again */
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.link_standby = dev_priv->vbt.psr.full_link;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-02 03:02:08 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Override link_standby x link_off defaults */
|
|
|
|
if (i915.enable_psr == 2 && !dev_priv->psr.link_standby) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR: Forcing link standby\n");
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.link_standby = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (i915.enable_psr == 3 && dev_priv->psr.link_standby) {
|
|
|
|
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR: Forcing main link off\n");
|
|
|
|
dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 23:52:28 +07:00
|
|
|
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
|
|
|
|
mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|