linux_dsm_epyc7002/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py

151 lines
5.7 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# coding=utf-8
#
# Copyright © 2016 Intel Corporation
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
# copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
# to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
# the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
# and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
# Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
#
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
# paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
# Software.
#
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
# IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
# FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
# THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
# FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
# IN THE SOFTWARE.
#
# Authors:
# Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
#
# Please make sure this works on both python2 and python3.
#
import codecs
import os
import subprocess
import sys
doc/sphinx: Track line-number of starting blocks Design is pretty simple: kernel-doc inserts breadcrumbs with line numbers, and sphinx picks them up. At first I went with a sphinx comment, but inserting those at random places seriously upsets the parser, and must be filtered. Hence why this version now uses "#define LINEO " since one of these ever escape into output it's pretty clear there is a bug. It seems to work well, and at least the 2-3 errors where sphinx complained about something that was not correct in kernel-doc text the line numbers matched up perfectly. v2: Instead of noodling around in the parser state machine, create a ViewList and parse it ourselves. This seems to be the recommended way, per Jani's suggestion. v3: - Split out ViewList pach. Splitting the kernel-doc changes from the sphinx ones isn't possible, since emitting the LINENO lines wreaks havoc with the rst formatting. We must filter them. - Improve the regex per Jani's suggestions, and compile it just once for speed. - Now that LINENO lines are eaten, also add them to function parameter descriptions. Much less content and offset than for in-line struct member descriptions, but still nice to know which exact continuation line upsets sphinx. - Simplify/clarify the line +/-1 business a bit. v4: Split out the scripts/kernel-doc changes and make line-numbers opt-in, as suggested by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2016-06-04 03:21:35 +07:00
import re
import glob
from docutils import nodes, statemachine
from docutils.statemachine import ViewList
from docutils.parsers.rst import directives, Directive
from sphinx.ext.autodoc import AutodocReporter
__version__ = '1.0'
class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
"""Extract kernel-doc comments from the specified file"""
required_argument = 1
optional_arguments = 4
option_spec = {
'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
'functions': directives.unchanged,
'export': directives.unchanged,
'internal': directives.unchanged,
}
has_content = False
def run(self):
env = self.state.document.settings.env
doc/sphinx: Track line-number of starting blocks Design is pretty simple: kernel-doc inserts breadcrumbs with line numbers, and sphinx picks them up. At first I went with a sphinx comment, but inserting those at random places seriously upsets the parser, and must be filtered. Hence why this version now uses "#define LINEO " since one of these ever escape into output it's pretty clear there is a bug. It seems to work well, and at least the 2-3 errors where sphinx complained about something that was not correct in kernel-doc text the line numbers matched up perfectly. v2: Instead of noodling around in the parser state machine, create a ViewList and parse it ourselves. This seems to be the recommended way, per Jani's suggestion. v3: - Split out ViewList pach. Splitting the kernel-doc changes from the sphinx ones isn't possible, since emitting the LINENO lines wreaks havoc with the rst formatting. We must filter them. - Improve the regex per Jani's suggestions, and compile it just once for speed. - Now that LINENO lines are eaten, also add them to function parameter descriptions. Much less content and offset than for in-line struct member descriptions, but still nice to know which exact continuation line upsets sphinx. - Simplify/clarify the line +/-1 business a bit. v4: Split out the scripts/kernel-doc changes and make line-numbers opt-in, as suggested by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2016-06-04 03:21:35 +07:00
cmd = [env.config.kerneldoc_bin, '-rst', '-enable-lineno']
filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
export_file_patterns = []
# Tell sphinx of the dependency
env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
tab_width = self.options.get('tab-width', self.state.document.settings.tab_width)
# FIXME: make this nicer and more robust against errors
if 'export' in self.options:
cmd += ['-export']
export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('export')).split()
elif 'internal' in self.options:
cmd += ['-internal']
export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
elif 'doc' in self.options:
cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
elif 'functions' in self.options:
functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
if functions:
for f in functions:
cmd += ['-function', f]
else:
cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
for pattern in export_file_patterns:
for f in glob.glob(env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + pattern):
env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(f))
cmd += ['-export-file', f]
cmd += [filename]
try:
env.app.verbose('calling kernel-doc \'%s\'' % (" ".join(cmd)))
p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
out, err = p.communicate()
out, err = codecs.decode(out, 'utf-8'), codecs.decode(err, 'utf-8')
if p.returncode != 0:
sys.stderr.write(err)
env.app.warn('kernel-doc \'%s\' failed with return code %d' % (" ".join(cmd), p.returncode))
return [nodes.error(None, nodes.paragraph(text = "kernel-doc missing"))]
elif env.config.kerneldoc_verbosity > 0:
sys.stderr.write(err)
lines = statemachine.string2lines(out, tab_width, convert_whitespace=True)
doc/sphinx: Track line-number of starting blocks Design is pretty simple: kernel-doc inserts breadcrumbs with line numbers, and sphinx picks them up. At first I went with a sphinx comment, but inserting those at random places seriously upsets the parser, and must be filtered. Hence why this version now uses "#define LINEO " since one of these ever escape into output it's pretty clear there is a bug. It seems to work well, and at least the 2-3 errors where sphinx complained about something that was not correct in kernel-doc text the line numbers matched up perfectly. v2: Instead of noodling around in the parser state machine, create a ViewList and parse it ourselves. This seems to be the recommended way, per Jani's suggestion. v3: - Split out ViewList pach. Splitting the kernel-doc changes from the sphinx ones isn't possible, since emitting the LINENO lines wreaks havoc with the rst formatting. We must filter them. - Improve the regex per Jani's suggestions, and compile it just once for speed. - Now that LINENO lines are eaten, also add them to function parameter descriptions. Much less content and offset than for in-line struct member descriptions, but still nice to know which exact continuation line upsets sphinx. - Simplify/clarify the line +/-1 business a bit. v4: Split out the scripts/kernel-doc changes and make line-numbers opt-in, as suggested by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2016-06-04 03:21:35 +07:00
result = ViewList()
lineoffset = 0;
line_regex = re.compile("^#define LINENO ([0-9]+)$")
for line in lines:
match = line_regex.search(line)
if match:
# sphinx counts lines from 0
lineoffset = int(match.group(1)) - 1
# we must eat our comments since the upset the markup
else:
result.append(line, filename, lineoffset)
doc/sphinx: Track line-number of starting blocks Design is pretty simple: kernel-doc inserts breadcrumbs with line numbers, and sphinx picks them up. At first I went with a sphinx comment, but inserting those at random places seriously upsets the parser, and must be filtered. Hence why this version now uses "#define LINEO " since one of these ever escape into output it's pretty clear there is a bug. It seems to work well, and at least the 2-3 errors where sphinx complained about something that was not correct in kernel-doc text the line numbers matched up perfectly. v2: Instead of noodling around in the parser state machine, create a ViewList and parse it ourselves. This seems to be the recommended way, per Jani's suggestion. v3: - Split out ViewList pach. Splitting the kernel-doc changes from the sphinx ones isn't possible, since emitting the LINENO lines wreaks havoc with the rst formatting. We must filter them. - Improve the regex per Jani's suggestions, and compile it just once for speed. - Now that LINENO lines are eaten, also add them to function parameter descriptions. Much less content and offset than for in-line struct member descriptions, but still nice to know which exact continuation line upsets sphinx. - Simplify/clarify the line +/-1 business a bit. v4: Split out the scripts/kernel-doc changes and make line-numbers opt-in, as suggested by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2016-06-04 03:21:35 +07:00
lineoffset += 1
node = nodes.section()
buf = self.state.memo.title_styles, self.state.memo.section_level, self.state.memo.reporter
self.state.memo.reporter = AutodocReporter(result, self.state.memo.reporter)
self.state.memo.title_styles, self.state.memo.section_level = [], 0
try:
self.state.nested_parse(result, 0, node, match_titles=1)
finally:
self.state.memo.title_styles, self.state.memo.section_level, self.state.memo.reporter = buf
return node.children
except Exception as e: # pylint: disable=W0703
env.app.warn('kernel-doc \'%s\' processing failed with: %s' %
(" ".join(cmd), str(e)))
return [nodes.error(None, nodes.paragraph(text = "kernel-doc missing"))]
def setup(app):
app.add_config_value('kerneldoc_bin', None, 'env')
app.add_config_value('kerneldoc_srctree', None, 'env')
app.add_config_value('kerneldoc_verbosity', 1, 'env')
app.add_directive('kernel-doc', KernelDocDirective)
return dict(
version = __version__,
parallel_read_safe = True,
parallel_write_safe = True
)