2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
CPU frequency and voltage scaling code in the Linux(TM) kernel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L i n u x C P U F r e q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C P U F r e q G o v e r n o r s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- information for users and developers -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
|
2005-06-26 04:58:33 +07:00
|
|
|
some additions and corrections by Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clock scaling allows you to change the clock speed of the CPUs on the
|
|
|
|
fly. This is a nice method to save battery power, because the lower
|
|
|
|
the clock speed, the less power the CPU consumes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
1. What is a CPUFreq Governor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Governors In the Linux Kernel
|
|
|
|
2.1 Performance
|
|
|
|
2.2 Powersave
|
|
|
|
2.3 Userspace
|
2005-06-26 04:58:33 +07:00
|
|
|
2.4 Ondemand
|
2005-12-01 16:09:23 +07:00
|
|
|
2.5 Conservative
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
2.6 Schedutil
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. The Governor Interface in the CPUfreq Core
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
4. References
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. What Is A CPUFreq Governor?
|
|
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-01 20:36:04 +07:00
|
|
|
Most cpufreq drivers (except the intel_pstate and longrun) or even most
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
cpu frequency scaling algorithms only allow the CPU frequency to be set
|
|
|
|
to predefined fixed values. In order to offer dynamic frequency
|
|
|
|
scaling, the cpufreq core must be able to tell these drivers of a
|
|
|
|
"target frequency". So these specific drivers will be transformed to
|
|
|
|
offer a "->target/target_index/fast_switch()" call instead of the
|
|
|
|
"->setpolicy()" call. For set_policy drivers, all stays the same,
|
|
|
|
though.
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to decide what frequency within the CPUfreq policy should be used?
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
That's done using "cpufreq governors".
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basically, it's the following flow graph:
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-04 03:50:39 +07:00
|
|
|
CPU can be set to switch independently | CPU can only be set
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
within specific "limits" | to specific frequencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"CPUfreq policy"
|
|
|
|
consists of frequency limits (policy->{min,max})
|
|
|
|
and CPUfreq governor to be used
|
|
|
|
/ \
|
|
|
|
/ \
|
|
|
|
/ the cpufreq governor decides
|
|
|
|
/ (dynamically or statically)
|
|
|
|
/ what target_freq to set within
|
|
|
|
/ the limits of policy->{min,max}
|
|
|
|
/ \
|
|
|
|
/ \
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
Using the ->setpolicy call, Using the ->target/target_index/fast_switch call,
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
the limits and the the frequency closest
|
|
|
|
"policy" is set. to target_freq is set.
|
|
|
|
It is assured that it
|
|
|
|
is within policy->{min,max}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Governors In the Linux Kernel
|
|
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Performance
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPUfreq governor "performance" sets the CPU statically to the
|
|
|
|
highest frequency within the borders of scaling_min_freq and
|
|
|
|
scaling_max_freq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-26 04:58:33 +07:00
|
|
|
2.2 Powersave
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPUfreq governor "powersave" sets the CPU statically to the
|
|
|
|
lowest frequency within the borders of scaling_min_freq and
|
|
|
|
scaling_max_freq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-26 04:58:33 +07:00
|
|
|
2.3 Userspace
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPUfreq governor "userspace" allows the user, or any userspace
|
|
|
|
program running with UID "root", to set the CPU to a specific frequency
|
|
|
|
by making a sysfs file "scaling_setspeed" available in the CPU-device
|
|
|
|
directory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-26 04:58:33 +07:00
|
|
|
2.4 Ondemand
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
The CPUfreq governor "ondemand" sets the CPU frequency depending on the
|
|
|
|
current system load. Load estimation is triggered by the scheduler
|
|
|
|
through the update_util_data->func hook; when triggered, cpufreq checks
|
|
|
|
the CPU-usage statistics over the last period and the governor sets the
|
|
|
|
CPU accordingly. The CPU must have the capability to switch the
|
|
|
|
frequency very quickly.
|
2017-01-06 12:38:04 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysfs files:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* sampling_rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured in uS (10^-6 seconds), this is how often you want the kernel
|
|
|
|
to look at the CPU usage and to make decisions on what to do about the
|
|
|
|
frequency. Typically this is set to values of around '10000' or more.
|
|
|
|
It's default value is (cmp. with users-guide.txt): transition_latency
|
|
|
|
* 1000. Be aware that transition latency is in ns and sampling_rate
|
|
|
|
is in us, so you get the same sysfs value by default. Sampling rate
|
|
|
|
should always get adjusted considering the transition latency to set
|
|
|
|
the sampling rate 750 times as high as the transition latency in the
|
|
|
|
bash (as said, 1000 is default), do:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ echo `$(($(cat cpuinfo_transition_latency) * 750 / 1000)) > ondemand/sampling_rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* sampling_rate_min:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sampling rate is limited by the HW transition latency:
|
|
|
|
transition_latency * 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or by kernel restrictions:
|
|
|
|
- If CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON is set, the limit is 10ms fixed.
|
|
|
|
- If CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON is not set or nohz=off boot parameter is
|
|
|
|
used, the limits depend on the CONFIG_HZ option:
|
|
|
|
HZ=1000: min=20000us (20ms)
|
|
|
|
HZ=250: min=80000us (80ms)
|
|
|
|
HZ=100: min=200000us (200ms)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The highest value of kernel and HW latency restrictions is shown and
|
|
|
|
used as the minimum sampling rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* up_threshold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This defines what the average CPU usage between the samplings of
|
|
|
|
'sampling_rate' needs to be for the kernel to make a decision on
|
|
|
|
whether it should increase the frequency. For example when it is set
|
|
|
|
to its default value of '95' it means that between the checking
|
|
|
|
intervals the CPU needs to be on average more than 95% in use to then
|
|
|
|
decide that the CPU frequency needs to be increased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ignore_nice_load:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This parameter takes a value of '0' or '1'. When set to '0' (its
|
|
|
|
default), all processes are counted towards the 'cpu utilisation'
|
|
|
|
value. When set to '1', the processes that are run with a 'nice'
|
|
|
|
value will not count (and thus be ignored) in the overall usage
|
|
|
|
calculation. This is useful if you are running a CPU intensive
|
|
|
|
calculation on your laptop that you do not care how long it takes to
|
|
|
|
complete as you can 'nice' it and prevent it from taking part in the
|
|
|
|
deciding process of whether to increase your CPU frequency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* sampling_down_factor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This parameter controls the rate at which the kernel makes a decision
|
|
|
|
on when to decrease the frequency while running at top speed. When set
|
|
|
|
to 1 (the default) decisions to reevaluate load are made at the same
|
|
|
|
interval regardless of current clock speed. But when set to greater
|
|
|
|
than 1 (e.g. 100) it acts as a multiplier for the scheduling interval
|
|
|
|
for reevaluating load when the CPU is at its top speed due to high
|
|
|
|
load. This improves performance by reducing the overhead of load
|
|
|
|
evaluation and helping the CPU stay at its top speed when truly busy,
|
|
|
|
rather than shifting back and forth in speed. This tunable has no
|
|
|
|
effect on behavior at lower speeds/lower CPU loads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* powersave_bias:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This parameter takes a value between 0 to 1000. It defines the
|
|
|
|
percentage (times 10) value of the target frequency that will be
|
|
|
|
shaved off of the target. For example, when set to 100 -- 10%, when
|
|
|
|
ondemand governor would have targeted 1000 MHz, it will target
|
|
|
|
1000 MHz - (10% of 1000 MHz) = 900 MHz instead. This is set to 0
|
|
|
|
(disabled) by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When AMD frequency sensitivity powersave bias driver --
|
|
|
|
drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c is loaded, this parameter
|
|
|
|
defines the workload frequency sensitivity threshold in which a lower
|
|
|
|
frequency is chosen instead of ondemand governor's original target.
|
|
|
|
The frequency sensitivity is a hardware reported (on AMD Family 16h
|
|
|
|
Processors and above) value between 0 to 100% that tells software how
|
|
|
|
the performance of the workload running on a CPU will change when
|
|
|
|
frequency changes. A workload with sensitivity of 0% (memory/IO-bound)
|
|
|
|
will not perform any better on higher core frequency, whereas a
|
|
|
|
workload with sensitivity of 100% (CPU-bound) will perform better
|
|
|
|
higher the frequency. When the driver is loaded, this is set to 400 by
|
|
|
|
default -- for CPUs running workloads with sensitivity value below
|
|
|
|
40%, a lower frequency is chosen. Unloading the driver or writing 0
|
|
|
|
will disable this feature.
|
2013-04-04 23:19:04 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-12-01 16:09:23 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 Conservative
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPUfreq governor "conservative", much like the "ondemand"
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
governor, sets the CPU frequency depending on the current usage. It
|
|
|
|
differs in behaviour in that it gracefully increases and decreases the
|
|
|
|
CPU speed rather than jumping to max speed the moment there is any load
|
|
|
|
on the CPU. This behaviour is more suitable in a battery powered
|
|
|
|
environment. The governor is tweaked in the same manner as the
|
|
|
|
"ondemand" governor through sysfs with the addition of:
|
2005-12-01 16:09:23 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-06 12:38:04 +07:00
|
|
|
* freq_step:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This describes what percentage steps the cpu freq should be increased
|
|
|
|
and decreased smoothly by. By default the cpu frequency will increase
|
|
|
|
in 5% chunks of your maximum cpu frequency. You can change this value
|
|
|
|
to anywhere between 0 and 100 where '0' will effectively lock your CPU
|
|
|
|
at a speed regardless of its load whilst '100' will, in theory, make
|
|
|
|
it behave identically to the "ondemand" governor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* down_threshold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same as the 'up_threshold' found for the "ondemand" governor but for
|
|
|
|
the opposite direction. For example when set to its default value of
|
|
|
|
'20' it means that if the CPU usage needs to be below 20% between
|
|
|
|
samples to have the frequency decreased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* sampling_down_factor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar functionality as in "ondemand" governor. But in
|
|
|
|
"conservative", it controls the rate at which the kernel makes a
|
|
|
|
decision on when to decrease the frequency while running in any speed.
|
|
|
|
Load for frequency increase is still evaluated every sampling rate.
|
2013-03-06 05:06:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 Schedutil
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "schedutil" governor aims at better integration with the Linux
|
|
|
|
kernel scheduler. Load estimation is achieved through the scheduler's
|
|
|
|
Per-Entity Load Tracking (PELT) mechanism, which also provides
|
|
|
|
information about the recent load [1]. This governor currently does
|
|
|
|
load based DVFS only for tasks managed by CFS. RT and DL scheduler tasks
|
|
|
|
are always run at the highest frequency. Unlike all the other
|
|
|
|
governors, the code is located under the kernel/sched/ directory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysfs files:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* rate_limit_us:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This contains a value in microseconds. The governor waits for
|
|
|
|
rate_limit_us time before reevaluating the load again, after it has
|
|
|
|
evaluated the load once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For an in-depth comparison with the other governors refer to [2].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
3. The Governor Interface in the CPUfreq Core
|
|
|
|
=============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A new governor must register itself with the CPUfreq core using
|
|
|
|
"cpufreq_register_governor". The struct cpufreq_governor, which has to
|
|
|
|
be passed to that function, must contain the following values:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
governor->name - A unique name for this governor.
|
|
|
|
governor->owner - .THIS_MODULE for the governor module (if appropriate).
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
plus a set of hooks to the functions implementing the governor's logic.
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPUfreq governor may call the CPU processor driver using one of
|
|
|
|
these two functions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int target_freq,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int relation);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int target_freq,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int relation);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
target_freq must be within policy->min and policy->max, of course.
|
2017-01-06 12:38:05 +07:00
|
|
|
What's the difference between these two functions? When your governor is
|
|
|
|
in a direct code path of a call to governor callbacks, like
|
|
|
|
governor->start(), the policy->rwsem is still held in the cpufreq core,
|
|
|
|
and there's no need to lock it again (in fact, this would cause a
|
|
|
|
deadlock). So use __cpufreq_driver_target only in these cases. In all
|
|
|
|
other cases (for example, when there's a "daemonized" function that
|
|
|
|
wakes up every second), use cpufreq_driver_target to take policy->rwsem
|
|
|
|
before the command is passed to the cpufreq driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. References
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Per-entity load tracking: https://lwn.net/Articles/531853/
|
|
|
|
[2] Improvements in CPU frequency management: https://lwn.net/Articles/682391/
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|