linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/cxio_hal.h

212 lines
7.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2006 Chelsio, Inc. All rights reserved.
*
* This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
* licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
* General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file
* COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the
* OpenIB.org BSD license below:
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
* without modification, are permitted provided that the following
* conditions are met:
*
* - Redistributions of source code must retain the above
* copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
* disclaimer.
*
* - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
* copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
* disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials
* provided with the distribution.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
* EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
* MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
* NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
* BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
* CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
* SOFTWARE.
*/
#ifndef __CXIO_HAL_H__
#define __CXIO_HAL_H__
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
kfifo: move struct kfifo in place This is a new generic kernel FIFO implementation. The current kernel fifo API is not very widely used, because it has to many constrains. Only 17 files in the current 2.6.31-rc5 used it. FIFO's are like list's a very basic thing and a kfifo API which handles the most use case would save a lot of development time and memory resources. I think this are the reasons why kfifo is not in use: - The API is to simple, important functions are missing - A fifo can be only allocated dynamically - There is a requirement of a spinlock whether you need it or not - There is no support for data records inside a fifo So I decided to extend the kfifo in a more generic way without blowing up the API to much. The new API has the following benefits: - Generic usage: For kernel internal use and/or device driver. - Provide an API for the most use case. - Slim API: The whole API provides 25 functions. - Linux style habit. - DECLARE_KFIFO, DEFINE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO Macros - Direct copy_to_user from the fifo and copy_from_user into the fifo. - The kfifo itself is an in place member of the using data structure, this save an indirection access and does not waste the kernel allocator. - Lockless access: if only one reader and one writer is active on the fifo, which is the common use case, no additional locking is necessary. - Remove spinlock - give the user the freedom of choice what kind of locking to use if one is required. - Ability to handle records. Three type of records are supported: - Variable length records between 0-255 bytes, with a record size field of 1 bytes. - Variable length records between 0-65535 bytes, with a record size field of 2 bytes. - Fixed size records, which no record size field. - Preserve memory resource. - Performance! - Easy to use! This patch: Since most users want to have the kfifo as part of another object, reorganize the code to allow including struct kfifo in another data structure. This requires changing the kfifo_alloc and kfifo_init prototypes so that we pass an existing kfifo pointer into them. This patch changes the implementation and all existing users. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-22 05:37:26 +07:00
#include <linux/kfifo.h>
#include "t3_cpl.h"
#include "t3cdev.h"
#include "cxgb3_ctl_defs.h"
#include "cxio_wr.h"
#define T3_CTRL_QP_ID FW_RI_SGEEC_START
#define T3_CTL_QP_TID FW_RI_TID_START
#define T3_CTRL_QP_SIZE_LOG2 8
#define T3_CTRL_CQ_ID 0
#define T3_MAX_NUM_RI (1<<15)
#define T3_MAX_NUM_QP (1<<15)
#define T3_MAX_NUM_CQ (1<<15)
#define T3_MAX_NUM_PD (1<<15)
#define T3_MAX_PBL_SIZE 256
#define T3_MAX_RQ_SIZE 1024
#define T3_MAX_QP_DEPTH (T3_MAX_RQ_SIZE-1)
#define T3_MAX_CQ_DEPTH 262144
#define T3_MAX_NUM_STAG (1<<15)
#define T3_MAX_MR_SIZE 0x100000000ULL
#define T3_PAGESIZE_MASK 0xffff000 /* 4KB-128MB */
#define T3_STAG_UNSET 0xffffffff
#define T3_MAX_DEV_NAME_LEN 32
#define CXIO_FW_MAJ 7
struct cxio_hal_ctrl_qp {
u32 wptr;
u32 rptr;
struct mutex lock; /* for the wtpr, can sleep */
wait_queue_head_t waitq;/* wait for RspQ/CQE msg */
union t3_wr *workq; /* the work request queue */
dma_addr_t dma_addr; /* pci bus address of the workq */
DEFINE_DMA_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping);
void __iomem *doorbell;
};
struct cxio_hal_resource {
kfifo: move struct kfifo in place This is a new generic kernel FIFO implementation. The current kernel fifo API is not very widely used, because it has to many constrains. Only 17 files in the current 2.6.31-rc5 used it. FIFO's are like list's a very basic thing and a kfifo API which handles the most use case would save a lot of development time and memory resources. I think this are the reasons why kfifo is not in use: - The API is to simple, important functions are missing - A fifo can be only allocated dynamically - There is a requirement of a spinlock whether you need it or not - There is no support for data records inside a fifo So I decided to extend the kfifo in a more generic way without blowing up the API to much. The new API has the following benefits: - Generic usage: For kernel internal use and/or device driver. - Provide an API for the most use case. - Slim API: The whole API provides 25 functions. - Linux style habit. - DECLARE_KFIFO, DEFINE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO Macros - Direct copy_to_user from the fifo and copy_from_user into the fifo. - The kfifo itself is an in place member of the using data structure, this save an indirection access and does not waste the kernel allocator. - Lockless access: if only one reader and one writer is active on the fifo, which is the common use case, no additional locking is necessary. - Remove spinlock - give the user the freedom of choice what kind of locking to use if one is required. - Ability to handle records. Three type of records are supported: - Variable length records between 0-255 bytes, with a record size field of 1 bytes. - Variable length records between 0-65535 bytes, with a record size field of 2 bytes. - Fixed size records, which no record size field. - Preserve memory resource. - Performance! - Easy to use! This patch: Since most users want to have the kfifo as part of another object, reorganize the code to allow including struct kfifo in another data structure. This requires changing the kfifo_alloc and kfifo_init prototypes so that we pass an existing kfifo pointer into them. This patch changes the implementation and all existing users. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-22 05:37:26 +07:00
struct kfifo tpt_fifo;
spinlock_t tpt_fifo_lock;
kfifo: move struct kfifo in place This is a new generic kernel FIFO implementation. The current kernel fifo API is not very widely used, because it has to many constrains. Only 17 files in the current 2.6.31-rc5 used it. FIFO's are like list's a very basic thing and a kfifo API which handles the most use case would save a lot of development time and memory resources. I think this are the reasons why kfifo is not in use: - The API is to simple, important functions are missing - A fifo can be only allocated dynamically - There is a requirement of a spinlock whether you need it or not - There is no support for data records inside a fifo So I decided to extend the kfifo in a more generic way without blowing up the API to much. The new API has the following benefits: - Generic usage: For kernel internal use and/or device driver. - Provide an API for the most use case. - Slim API: The whole API provides 25 functions. - Linux style habit. - DECLARE_KFIFO, DEFINE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO Macros - Direct copy_to_user from the fifo and copy_from_user into the fifo. - The kfifo itself is an in place member of the using data structure, this save an indirection access and does not waste the kernel allocator. - Lockless access: if only one reader and one writer is active on the fifo, which is the common use case, no additional locking is necessary. - Remove spinlock - give the user the freedom of choice what kind of locking to use if one is required. - Ability to handle records. Three type of records are supported: - Variable length records between 0-255 bytes, with a record size field of 1 bytes. - Variable length records between 0-65535 bytes, with a record size field of 2 bytes. - Fixed size records, which no record size field. - Preserve memory resource. - Performance! - Easy to use! This patch: Since most users want to have the kfifo as part of another object, reorganize the code to allow including struct kfifo in another data structure. This requires changing the kfifo_alloc and kfifo_init prototypes so that we pass an existing kfifo pointer into them. This patch changes the implementation and all existing users. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-22 05:37:26 +07:00
struct kfifo qpid_fifo;
spinlock_t qpid_fifo_lock;
kfifo: move struct kfifo in place This is a new generic kernel FIFO implementation. The current kernel fifo API is not very widely used, because it has to many constrains. Only 17 files in the current 2.6.31-rc5 used it. FIFO's are like list's a very basic thing and a kfifo API which handles the most use case would save a lot of development time and memory resources. I think this are the reasons why kfifo is not in use: - The API is to simple, important functions are missing - A fifo can be only allocated dynamically - There is a requirement of a spinlock whether you need it or not - There is no support for data records inside a fifo So I decided to extend the kfifo in a more generic way without blowing up the API to much. The new API has the following benefits: - Generic usage: For kernel internal use and/or device driver. - Provide an API for the most use case. - Slim API: The whole API provides 25 functions. - Linux style habit. - DECLARE_KFIFO, DEFINE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO Macros - Direct copy_to_user from the fifo and copy_from_user into the fifo. - The kfifo itself is an in place member of the using data structure, this save an indirection access and does not waste the kernel allocator. - Lockless access: if only one reader and one writer is active on the fifo, which is the common use case, no additional locking is necessary. - Remove spinlock - give the user the freedom of choice what kind of locking to use if one is required. - Ability to handle records. Three type of records are supported: - Variable length records between 0-255 bytes, with a record size field of 1 bytes. - Variable length records between 0-65535 bytes, with a record size field of 2 bytes. - Fixed size records, which no record size field. - Preserve memory resource. - Performance! - Easy to use! This patch: Since most users want to have the kfifo as part of another object, reorganize the code to allow including struct kfifo in another data structure. This requires changing the kfifo_alloc and kfifo_init prototypes so that we pass an existing kfifo pointer into them. This patch changes the implementation and all existing users. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-22 05:37:26 +07:00
struct kfifo cqid_fifo;
spinlock_t cqid_fifo_lock;
kfifo: move struct kfifo in place This is a new generic kernel FIFO implementation. The current kernel fifo API is not very widely used, because it has to many constrains. Only 17 files in the current 2.6.31-rc5 used it. FIFO's are like list's a very basic thing and a kfifo API which handles the most use case would save a lot of development time and memory resources. I think this are the reasons why kfifo is not in use: - The API is to simple, important functions are missing - A fifo can be only allocated dynamically - There is a requirement of a spinlock whether you need it or not - There is no support for data records inside a fifo So I decided to extend the kfifo in a more generic way without blowing up the API to much. The new API has the following benefits: - Generic usage: For kernel internal use and/or device driver. - Provide an API for the most use case. - Slim API: The whole API provides 25 functions. - Linux style habit. - DECLARE_KFIFO, DEFINE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO Macros - Direct copy_to_user from the fifo and copy_from_user into the fifo. - The kfifo itself is an in place member of the using data structure, this save an indirection access and does not waste the kernel allocator. - Lockless access: if only one reader and one writer is active on the fifo, which is the common use case, no additional locking is necessary. - Remove spinlock - give the user the freedom of choice what kind of locking to use if one is required. - Ability to handle records. Three type of records are supported: - Variable length records between 0-255 bytes, with a record size field of 1 bytes. - Variable length records between 0-65535 bytes, with a record size field of 2 bytes. - Fixed size records, which no record size field. - Preserve memory resource. - Performance! - Easy to use! This patch: Since most users want to have the kfifo as part of another object, reorganize the code to allow including struct kfifo in another data structure. This requires changing the kfifo_alloc and kfifo_init prototypes so that we pass an existing kfifo pointer into them. This patch changes the implementation and all existing users. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-22 05:37:26 +07:00
struct kfifo pdid_fifo;
spinlock_t pdid_fifo_lock;
};
struct cxio_qpid_list {
struct list_head entry;
u32 qpid;
};
struct cxio_ucontext {
struct list_head qpids;
struct mutex lock;
};
struct cxio_rdev {
char dev_name[T3_MAX_DEV_NAME_LEN];
struct t3cdev *t3cdev_p;
struct rdma_info rnic_info;
struct adap_ports port_info;
struct cxio_hal_resource *rscp;
struct cxio_hal_ctrl_qp ctrl_qp;
void *ulp;
unsigned long qpshift;
u32 qpnr;
u32 qpmask;
struct cxio_ucontext uctx;
struct gen_pool *pbl_pool;
struct gen_pool *rqt_pool;
struct list_head entry;
struct ch_embedded_info fw_info;
u32 flags;
#define CXIO_ERROR_FATAL 1
};
static inline int cxio_fatal_error(struct cxio_rdev *rdev_p)
{
return rdev_p->flags & CXIO_ERROR_FATAL;
}
static inline int cxio_num_stags(struct cxio_rdev *rdev_p)
{
return min((int)T3_MAX_NUM_STAG, (int)((rdev_p->rnic_info.tpt_top - rdev_p->rnic_info.tpt_base) >> 5));
}
typedef void (*cxio_hal_ev_callback_func_t) (struct cxio_rdev * rdev_p,
struct sk_buff * skb);
#define RSPQ_CQID(rsp) (be32_to_cpu(rsp->cq_ptrid) & 0xffff)
#define RSPQ_CQPTR(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->cq_ptrid) >> 16) & 0xffff)
#define RSPQ_GENBIT(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 16) & 1)
#define RSPQ_OVERFLOW(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 17) & 1)
#define RSPQ_AN(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 18) & 1)
#define RSPQ_SE(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 19) & 1)
#define RSPQ_NOTIFY(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 20) & 1)
#define RSPQ_CQBRANCH(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 21) & 1)
#define RSPQ_CREDIT_THRESH(rsp) ((be32_to_cpu(rsp->flags) >> 22) & 1)
struct respQ_msg_t {
__be32 flags; /* flit 0 */
__be32 cq_ptrid;
__be64 rsvd; /* flit 1 */
struct t3_cqe cqe; /* flits 2-3 */
};
enum t3_cq_opcode {
CQ_ARM_AN = 0x2,
CQ_ARM_SE = 0x6,
CQ_FORCE_AN = 0x3,
CQ_CREDIT_UPDATE = 0x7
};
int cxio_rdev_open(struct cxio_rdev *rdev);
void cxio_rdev_close(struct cxio_rdev *rdev);
int cxio_hal_cq_op(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct t3_cq *cq,
enum t3_cq_opcode op, u32 credit);
int cxio_create_cq(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct t3_cq *cq, int kernel);
int cxio_destroy_cq(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct t3_cq *cq);
int cxio_resize_cq(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct t3_cq *cq);
void cxio_release_ucontext(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct cxio_ucontext *uctx);
void cxio_init_ucontext(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct cxio_ucontext *uctx);
int cxio_create_qp(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 kernel_domain, struct t3_wq *wq,
struct cxio_ucontext *uctx);
int cxio_destroy_qp(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct t3_wq *wq,
struct cxio_ucontext *uctx);
int cxio_peek_cq(struct t3_wq *wr, struct t3_cq *cq, int opcode);
int cxio_write_pbl(struct cxio_rdev *rdev_p, __be64 *pbl,
u32 pbl_addr, u32 pbl_size);
int cxio_register_phys_mem(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 * stag, u32 pdid,
enum tpt_mem_perm perm, u32 zbva, u64 to, u32 len,
u8 page_size, u32 pbl_size, u32 pbl_addr);
int cxio_reregister_phys_mem(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 * stag, u32 pdid,
enum tpt_mem_perm perm, u32 zbva, u64 to, u32 len,
u8 page_size, u32 pbl_size, u32 pbl_addr);
int cxio_dereg_mem(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 stag, u32 pbl_size,
u32 pbl_addr);
int cxio_allocate_window(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 * stag, u32 pdid);
int cxio_allocate_stag(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 *stag, u32 pdid, u32 pbl_size, u32 pbl_addr);
int cxio_deallocate_window(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 stag);
int cxio_rdma_init(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, struct t3_rdma_init_attr *attr);
void cxio_register_ev_cb(cxio_hal_ev_callback_func_t ev_cb);
void cxio_unregister_ev_cb(cxio_hal_ev_callback_func_t ev_cb);
u32 cxio_hal_get_pdid(struct cxio_hal_resource *rscp);
void cxio_hal_put_pdid(struct cxio_hal_resource *rscp, u32 pdid);
int __init cxio_hal_init(void);
void __exit cxio_hal_exit(void);
int cxio_flush_rq(struct t3_wq *wq, struct t3_cq *cq, int count);
int cxio_flush_sq(struct t3_wq *wq, struct t3_cq *cq, int count);
void cxio_count_rcqes(struct t3_cq *cq, struct t3_wq *wq, int *count);
void cxio_count_scqes(struct t3_cq *cq, struct t3_wq *wq, int *count);
void cxio_flush_hw_cq(struct t3_cq *cq);
int cxio_poll_cq(struct t3_wq *wq, struct t3_cq *cq, struct t3_cqe *cqe,
u8 *cqe_flushed, u64 *cookie, u32 *credit);
int iwch_cxgb3_ofld_send(struct t3cdev *tdev, struct sk_buff *skb);
#define MOD "iw_cxgb3: "
#define PDBG(fmt, args...) pr_debug(MOD fmt, ## args)
#ifdef DEBUG
void cxio_dump_tpt(struct cxio_rdev *rev, u32 stag);
void cxio_dump_pbl(struct cxio_rdev *rev, u32 pbl_addr, uint len, u8 shift);
void cxio_dump_wqe(union t3_wr *wqe);
void cxio_dump_wce(struct t3_cqe *wce);
void cxio_dump_rqt(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 hwtid, int nents);
void cxio_dump_tcb(struct cxio_rdev *rdev, u32 hwtid);
#endif
#endif