linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c

659 lines
17 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/gpio.h>
/* Optional implementation infrastructure for GPIO interfaces.
*
* Platforms may want to use this if they tend to use very many GPIOs
* that aren't part of a System-On-Chip core; or across I2C/SPI/etc.
*
* When kernel footprint or instruction count is an issue, simpler
* implementations may be preferred. The GPIO programming interface
* allows for inlining speed-critical get/set operations for common
* cases, so that access to SOC-integrated GPIOs can sometimes cost
* only an instruction or two per bit.
*/
/* When debugging, extend minimal trust to callers and platform code.
* Also emit diagnostic messages that may help initial bringup, when
* board setup or driver bugs are most common.
*
* Otherwise, minimize overhead in what may be bitbanging codepaths.
*/
#ifdef DEBUG
#define extra_checks 1
#else
#define extra_checks 0
#endif
/* gpio_lock prevents conflicts during gpio_desc[] table updates.
* While any GPIO is requested, its gpio_chip is not removable;
* each GPIO's "requested" flag serves as a lock and refcount.
*/
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpio_lock);
struct gpio_desc {
struct gpio_chip *chip;
unsigned long flags;
/* flag symbols are bit numbers */
#define FLAG_REQUESTED 0
#define FLAG_IS_OUT 1
#define FLAG_RESERVED 2
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
const char *label;
#endif
};
static struct gpio_desc gpio_desc[ARCH_NR_GPIOS];
static inline void desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *d, const char *label)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
d->label = label;
#endif
}
/* Warn when drivers omit gpio_request() calls -- legal but ill-advised
* when setting direction, and otherwise illegal. Until board setup code
* and drivers use explicit requests everywhere (which won't happen when
* those calls have no teeth) we can't avoid autorequesting. This nag
* message should motivate switching to explicit requests...
*/
static void gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) {
pr_warning("GPIO-%d autorequested\n", (int)(desc - gpio_desc));
desc_set_label(desc, "[auto]");
if (!try_module_get(desc->chip->owner))
pr_err("GPIO-%d: module can't be gotten \n",
(int)(desc - gpio_desc));
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
}
}
/* caller holds gpio_lock *OR* gpio is marked as requested */
static inline struct gpio_chip *gpio_to_chip(unsigned gpio)
{
return gpio_desc[gpio].chip;
}
/* dynamic allocation of GPIOs, e.g. on a hotplugged device */
static int gpiochip_find_base(int ngpio)
{
int i;
int spare = 0;
int base = -ENOSPC;
for (i = ARCH_NR_GPIOS - 1; i >= 0 ; i--) {
struct gpio_desc *desc = &gpio_desc[i];
struct gpio_chip *chip = desc->chip;
if (!chip && !test_bit(FLAG_RESERVED, &desc->flags)) {
spare++;
if (spare == ngpio) {
base = i;
break;
}
} else {
spare = 0;
if (chip)
i -= chip->ngpio - 1;
}
}
if (gpio_is_valid(base))
pr_debug("%s: found new base at %d\n", __func__, base);
return base;
}
/**
* gpiochip_reserve() - reserve range of gpios to use with platform code only
* @start: starting gpio number
* @ngpio: number of gpios to reserve
* Context: platform init, potentially before irqs or kmalloc will work
*
* Returns a negative errno if any gpio within the range is already reserved
* or registered, else returns zero as a success code. Use this function
* to mark a range of gpios as unavailable for dynamic gpio number allocation,
* for example because its driver support is not yet loaded.
*/
int __init gpiochip_reserve(int start, int ngpio)
{
int ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
int i;
if (!gpio_is_valid(start) || !gpio_is_valid(start + ngpio))
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
for (i = start; i < start + ngpio; i++) {
struct gpio_desc *desc = &gpio_desc[i];
if (desc->chip || test_bit(FLAG_RESERVED, &desc->flags)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto err;
}
set_bit(FLAG_RESERVED, &desc->flags);
}
pr_debug("%s: reserved gpios from %d to %d\n",
__func__, start, start + ngpio - 1);
err:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
/**
* gpiochip_add() - register a gpio_chip
* @chip: the chip to register, with chip->base initialized
* Context: potentially before irqs or kmalloc will work
*
* Returns a negative errno if the chip can't be registered, such as
* because the chip->base is invalid or already associated with a
* different chip. Otherwise it returns zero as a success code.
*
* If chip->base is negative, this requests dynamic assignment of
* a range of valid GPIOs.
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
*/
int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
unsigned long flags;
int status = 0;
unsigned id;
int base = chip->base;
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
if ((!gpio_is_valid(base) || !gpio_is_valid(base + chip->ngpio))
&& base >= 0) {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
status = -EINVAL;
goto fail;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
if (base < 0) {
base = gpiochip_find_base(chip->ngpio);
if (base < 0) {
status = base;
goto fail_unlock;
}
chip->base = base;
}
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
/* these GPIO numbers must not be managed by another gpio_chip */
for (id = base; id < base + chip->ngpio; id++) {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
if (gpio_desc[id].chip != NULL) {
status = -EBUSY;
break;
}
}
if (status == 0) {
for (id = base; id < base + chip->ngpio; id++) {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
gpio_desc[id].chip = chip;
gpio_desc[id].flags = 0;
}
}
fail_unlock:
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
fail:
/* failures here can mean systems won't boot... */
if (status)
pr_err("gpiochip_add: gpios %d..%d (%s) not registered\n",
chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio,
chip->label ? : "generic");
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
/**
* gpiochip_remove() - unregister a gpio_chip
* @chip: the chip to unregister
*
* A gpio_chip with any GPIOs still requested may not be removed.
*/
int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
unsigned long flags;
int status = 0;
unsigned id;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++) {
if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gpio_desc[id].flags)) {
status = -EBUSY;
break;
}
}
if (status == 0) {
for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++)
gpio_desc[id].chip = NULL;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove);
/* These "optional" allocation calls help prevent drivers from stomping
* on each other, and help provide better diagnostics in debugfs.
* They're called even less than the "set direction" calls.
*/
int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
{
struct gpio_desc *desc;
int status = -EINVAL;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
goto done;
desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
if (desc->chip == NULL)
goto done;
if (!try_module_get(desc->chip->owner))
goto done;
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
/* NOTE: gpio_request() can be called in early boot,
* before IRQs are enabled.
*/
if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) {
desc_set_label(desc, label ? : "?");
status = 0;
} else {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
status = -EBUSY;
module_put(desc->chip->owner);
}
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
done:
if (status)
pr_debug("gpio_request: gpio-%d (%s) status %d\n",
gpio, label ? : "?", status);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_request);
void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct gpio_desc *desc;
if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
WARN_ON(extra_checks);
return;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
if (desc->chip && test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)) {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
desc_set_label(desc, NULL);
module_put(desc->chip->owner);
} else
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
WARN_ON(extra_checks);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_free);
/**
* gpiochip_is_requested - return string iff signal was requested
* @chip: controller managing the signal
* @offset: of signal within controller's 0..(ngpio - 1) range
*
* Returns NULL if the GPIO is not currently requested, else a string.
* If debugfs support is enabled, the string returned is the label passed
* to gpio_request(); otherwise it is a meaningless constant.
*
* This function is for use by GPIO controller drivers. The label can
* help with diagnostics, and knowing that the signal is used as a GPIO
* can help avoid accidentally multiplexing it to another controller.
*/
const char *gpiochip_is_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
unsigned gpio = chip->base + offset;
if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio) || gpio_desc[gpio].chip != chip)
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
return NULL;
if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gpio_desc[gpio].flags) == 0)
return NULL;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
return gpio_desc[gpio].label;
#else
return "?";
#endif
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_is_requested);
/* Drivers MUST set GPIO direction before making get/set calls. In
* some cases this is done in early boot, before IRQs are enabled.
*
* As a rule these aren't called more than once (except for drivers
* using the open-drain emulation idiom) so these are natural places
* to accumulate extra debugging checks. Note that we can't (yet)
* rely on gpio_request() having been called beforehand.
*/
int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct gpio_chip *chip;
struct gpio_desc *desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
int status = -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
goto fail;
chip = desc->chip;
if (!chip || !chip->get || !chip->direction_input)
goto fail;
gpio -= chip->base;
if (gpio >= chip->ngpio)
goto fail;
gpio_ensure_requested(desc);
/* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
might_sleep_if(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep);
status = chip->direction_input(chip, gpio);
if (status == 0)
clear_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags);
return status;
fail:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
if (status)
pr_debug("%s: gpio-%d status %d\n",
__func__, gpio, status);
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_direction_input);
int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct gpio_chip *chip;
struct gpio_desc *desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
int status = -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
goto fail;
chip = desc->chip;
if (!chip || !chip->set || !chip->direction_output)
goto fail;
gpio -= chip->base;
if (gpio >= chip->ngpio)
goto fail;
gpio_ensure_requested(desc);
/* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
might_sleep_if(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep);
status = chip->direction_output(chip, gpio, value);
if (status == 0)
set_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags);
return status;
fail:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
if (status)
pr_debug("%s: gpio-%d status %d\n",
__func__, gpio, status);
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_direction_output);
/* I/O calls are only valid after configuration completed; the relevant
* "is this a valid GPIO" error checks should already have been done.
*
* "Get" operations are often inlinable as reading a pin value register,
* and masking the relevant bit in that register.
*
* When "set" operations are inlinable, they involve writing that mask to
* one register to set a low value, or a different register to set it high.
* Otherwise locking is needed, so there may be little value to inlining.
*
*------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* IMPORTANT!!! The hot paths -- get/set value -- assume that callers
* have requested the GPIO. That can include implicit requesting by
* a direction setting call. Marking a gpio as requested locks its chip
* in memory, guaranteeing that these table lookups need no more locking
* and that gpiochip_remove() will fail.
*
* REVISIT when debugging, consider adding some instrumentation to ensure
* that the GPIO was actually requested.
*/
/**
* __gpio_get_value() - return a gpio's value
* @gpio: gpio whose value will be returned
* Context: any
*
* This is used directly or indirectly to implement gpio_get_value().
* It returns the zero or nonzero value provided by the associated
* gpio_chip.get() method; or zero if no such method is provided.
*/
int __gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip;
chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
WARN_ON(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep);
return chip->get ? chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base) : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__gpio_get_value);
/**
* __gpio_set_value() - assign a gpio's value
* @gpio: gpio whose value will be assigned
* @value: value to assign
* Context: any
*
* This is used directly or indirectly to implement gpio_set_value().
* It invokes the associated gpio_chip.set() method.
*/
void __gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip;
chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
WARN_ON(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep);
chip->set(chip, gpio - chip->base, value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__gpio_set_value);
/**
* __gpio_cansleep() - report whether gpio value access will sleep
* @gpio: gpio in question
* Context: any
*
* This is used directly or indirectly to implement gpio_cansleep(). It
* returns nonzero if access reading or writing the GPIO value can sleep.
*/
int __gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip;
/* only call this on GPIOs that are valid! */
chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
return chip->can_sleep;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__gpio_cansleep);
/* There's no value in making it easy to inline GPIO calls that may sleep.
* Common examples include ones connected to I2C or SPI chips.
*/
int gpio_get_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip;
might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
return chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_get_value_cansleep);
void gpio_set_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip;
might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
chip->set(chip, gpio - chip->base, value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_set_value_cansleep);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
unsigned i;
unsigned gpio = chip->base;
struct gpio_desc *gdesc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
int is_out;
for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++, gpio++, gdesc++) {
if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gdesc->flags))
continue;
is_out = test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &gdesc->flags);
seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-12s) %s %s",
gpio, gdesc->label,
is_out ? "out" : "in ",
chip->get
? (chip->get(chip, i) ? "hi" : "lo")
: "? ");
if (!is_out) {
int irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
/* This races with request_irq(), set_irq_type(),
* and set_irq_wake() ... but those are "rare".
*
* More significantly, trigger type flags aren't
* currently maintained by genirq.
*/
if (irq >= 0 && desc->action) {
char *trigger;
switch (desc->status & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
case IRQ_TYPE_NONE:
trigger = "(default)";
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
trigger = "edge-falling";
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
trigger = "edge-rising";
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
trigger = "edge-both";
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
trigger = "level-high";
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
trigger = "level-low";
break;
default:
trigger = "?trigger?";
break;
}
seq_printf(s, " irq-%d %s%s",
irq, trigger,
(desc->status & IRQ_WAKEUP)
? " wakeup" : "");
}
}
seq_printf(s, "\n");
}
}
static int gpiolib_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip = NULL;
unsigned gpio;
int started = 0;
/* REVISIT this isn't locked against gpio_chip removal ... */
for (gpio = 0; gpio_is_valid(gpio); gpio++) {
gpiolib: add gpio provider infrastructure Provide new implementation infrastructure that platforms may choose to use when implementing the GPIO programming interface. Platforms can update their GPIO support to use this. In many cases the incremental cost to access a non-inlined GPIO should be less than a dozen instructions, with the memory cost being about a page (total) of extra data and code. The upside is: * Providing two features which were "want to have (but OK to defer)" when GPIO interfaces were first discussed in November 2006: - A "struct gpio_chip" to plug in GPIOs that aren't directly supported by SOC platforms, but come from FPGAs or other multifunction devices using conventional device registers (like UCB-1x00 or SM501 GPIOs, and southbridges in PCs with more open specs than usual). - Full support for message-based GPIO expanders, where registers are accessed through sleeping I/O calls. Previous support for these "cansleep" calls was just stubs. (One example: the widely used pcf8574 I2C chips, with 8 GPIOs each.) * Including a non-stub implementation of the gpio_{request,free}() calls, making those calls much more useful. The diagnostic labels are also recorded given DEBUG_FS, so /sys/kernel/debug/gpio can show a snapshot of all GPIOs known to this infrastructure. The driver programming interfaces introduced in 2.6.21 do not change at all; this infrastructure is entirely below those covers. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-05 13:28:20 +07:00
if (chip == gpio_desc[gpio].chip)
continue;
chip = gpio_desc[gpio].chip;
if (!chip)
continue;
seq_printf(s, "%sGPIOs %d-%d, %s%s:\n",
started ? "\n" : "",
chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio - 1,
chip->label ? : "generic",
chip->can_sleep ? ", can sleep" : "");
started = 1;
if (chip->dbg_show)
chip->dbg_show(s, chip);
else
gpiolib_dbg_show(s, chip);
}
return 0;
}
static int gpiolib_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return single_open(file, gpiolib_show, NULL);
}
static struct file_operations gpiolib_operations = {
.open = gpiolib_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init gpiolib_debugfs_init(void)
{
/* /sys/kernel/debug/gpio */
(void) debugfs_create_file("gpio", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO,
NULL, NULL, &gpiolib_operations);
return 0;
}
subsys_initcall(gpiolib_debugfs_init);
#endif /* DEBUG_FS */