2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Read-Copy Update mechanism for mutual exclusion
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
* (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2001
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Authors: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
* Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Based on the original work by Paul McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
* and inputs from Rusty Russell, Andrea Arcangeli and Andi Kleen.
|
|
|
|
* Papers:
|
|
|
|
* http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/paper/rclockpdcsproof.pdf
|
|
|
|
* http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock_OLS.2001.05.01c.sc.pdf (OLS2001)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see -
|
|
|
|
* http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rcupdate.html
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/smp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/atomic.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/bitops.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/notifier.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpu.h>
|
2006-03-23 18:00:19 +07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/mutex.h>
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
enum rcu_barrier {
|
|
|
|
RCU_BARRIER_STD,
|
|
|
|
RCU_BARRIER_BH,
|
|
|
|
RCU_BARRIER_SCHED,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
|
2006-03-08 12:55:33 +07:00
|
|
|
static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
|
2006-03-23 18:00:19 +07:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
|
2006-03-08 12:55:33 +07:00
|
|
|
static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-14 06:03:15 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Awaken the corresponding synchronize_rcu() instance now that a
|
|
|
|
* grace period has elapsed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
rcu: add call_rcu_sched()
Fourth cut of patch to provide the call_rcu_sched(). This is again to
synchronize_sched() as call_rcu() is to synchronize_rcu().
Should be fine for experimental and -rt use, but not ready for inclusion.
With some luck, I will be able to tell Andrew to come out of hiding on
the next round.
Passes multi-day rcutorture sessions with concurrent CPU hotplugging.
Fixes since the first version include a bug that could result in
indefinite blocking (spotted by Gautham Shenoy), better resiliency
against CPU-hotplug operations, and other minor fixes.
Fixes since the second version include reworking grace-period detection
to avoid deadlocks that could happen when running concurrently with
CPU hotplug, adding Mathieu's fix to avoid the softlockup messages,
as well as Mathieu's fix to allow use earlier in boot.
Fixes since the third version include a wrong-CPU bug spotted by
Andrew, getting rid of the obsolete synchronize_kernel API that somehow
snuck back in, merging spin_unlock() and local_irq_restore() in a
few places, commenting the code that checks for quiescent states based
on interrupting from user-mode execution or the idle loop, removing
some inline attributes, and some code-style changes.
Known/suspected shortcomings:
o I still do not entirely trust the sleep/wakeup logic. Next step
will be to use a private snapshot of the CPU online mask in
rcu_sched_grace_period() -- if the CPU wasn't there at the start
of the grace period, we don't need to hear from it. And the
bit about accounting for changes in online CPUs inside of
rcu_sched_grace_period() is ugly anyway.
o It might be good for rcu_sched_grace_period() to invoke
resched_cpu() when a given CPU wasn't responding quickly,
but resched_cpu() is declared static...
This patch also fixes a long-standing bug in the earlier preemptable-RCU
implementation of synchronize_rcu() that could result in loss of
concurrent external changes to a task's CPU affinity mask. I still cannot
remember who reported this...
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
|
2006-03-08 12:55:33 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
struct rcu_synchronize *rcu;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rcu = container_of(head, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
|
|
|
|
complete(&rcu->completion);
|
2006-03-08 12:55:33 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
* synchronize_rcu - wait until a grace period has elapsed.
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
*
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
* Control will return to the caller some time after a full grace
|
|
|
|
* period has elapsed, in other words after all currently executing RCU
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
* read-side critical sections have completed. RCU read-side critical
|
|
|
|
* sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(),
|
|
|
|
* and may be nested.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-08-21 06:35:19 +07:00
|
|
|
void synchronize_rcu(void); /* Makes kernel-doc tools happy */
|
rcu: add call_rcu_sched()
Fourth cut of patch to provide the call_rcu_sched(). This is again to
synchronize_sched() as call_rcu() is to synchronize_rcu().
Should be fine for experimental and -rt use, but not ready for inclusion.
With some luck, I will be able to tell Andrew to come out of hiding on
the next round.
Passes multi-day rcutorture sessions with concurrent CPU hotplugging.
Fixes since the first version include a bug that could result in
indefinite blocking (spotted by Gautham Shenoy), better resiliency
against CPU-hotplug operations, and other minor fixes.
Fixes since the second version include reworking grace-period detection
to avoid deadlocks that could happen when running concurrently with
CPU hotplug, adding Mathieu's fix to avoid the softlockup messages,
as well as Mathieu's fix to allow use earlier in boot.
Fixes since the third version include a wrong-CPU bug spotted by
Andrew, getting rid of the obsolete synchronize_kernel API that somehow
snuck back in, merging spin_unlock() and local_irq_restore() in a
few places, commenting the code that checks for quiescent states based
on interrupting from user-mode execution or the idle loop, removing
some inline attributes, and some code-style changes.
Known/suspected shortcomings:
o I still do not entirely trust the sleep/wakeup logic. Next step
will be to use a private snapshot of the CPU online mask in
rcu_sched_grace_period() -- if the CPU wasn't there at the start
of the grace period, we don't need to hear from it. And the
bit about accounting for changes in online CPUs inside of
rcu_sched_grace_period() is ugly anyway.
o It might be good for rcu_sched_grace_period() to invoke
resched_cpu() when a given CPU wasn't responding quickly,
but resched_cpu() is declared static...
This patch also fixes a long-standing bug in the earlier preemptable-RCU
implementation of synchronize_rcu() that could result in loss of
concurrent external changes to a task's CPU affinity mask. I still cannot
remember who reported this...
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
synchronize_rcu_xxx(synchronize_rcu, call_rcu)
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
|
2006-06-27 16:54:04 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
|
|
|
|
complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Called with preemption disabled, and from cross-cpu IRQ context.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
switch ((enum rcu_barrier)type) {
|
|
|
|
case RCU_BARRIER_STD:
|
|
|
|
call_rcu(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case RCU_BARRIER_BH:
|
|
|
|
call_rcu_bh(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case RCU_BARRIER_SCHED:
|
|
|
|
call_rcu_sched(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
|
|
|
|
* RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
|
2006-03-23 18:00:19 +07:00
|
|
|
/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
rcupdate: fix bug of rcu_barrier*()
current rcu_barrier_bh() is like this:
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 0);
/*
* The queueing of callbacks in all CPUs must be atomic with
* respect to RCU, otherwise one CPU may queue a callback,
* wait for a grace period, decrement barrier count and call
* complete(), while other CPUs have not yet queued anything.
* So, we need to make sure that grace periods cannot complete
* until all the callbacks are queued.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)RCU_BARRIER_BH, 1);
rcu_read_unlock();
wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
}
The inconsistency of the code and the comments show a bug here.
rcu_read_lock() cannot make sure that "grace periods for RCU_BH
cannot complete until all the callbacks are queued".
it only make sure that race periods for RCU cannot complete
until all the callbacks are queued.
so we must use rcu_read_lock_bh() for rcu_barrier_bh().
like this:
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
......
rcu_read_lock_bh();
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)RCU_BARRIER_BH, 1);
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
......
}
and also rcu_barrier() rcu_barrier_sched() are implemented like this.
it will bring a lot of duplicate code. My patch uses another way to
fix this bug, please see the comment of my patch.
Thank Paul E. McKenney for he rewrote the comment.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-17 13:40:30 +07:00
|
|
|
* Initialize rcu_barrier_cpu_count to 1, then invoke
|
|
|
|
* rcu_barrier_func() on each CPU, so that each CPU also has
|
|
|
|
* incremented rcu_barrier_cpu_count. Only then is it safe to
|
|
|
|
* decrement rcu_barrier_cpu_count -- otherwise the first CPU
|
|
|
|
* might complete its grace period before all of the other CPUs
|
|
|
|
* did their increment, causing this function to return too
|
|
|
|
* early.
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
rcupdate: fix bug of rcu_barrier*()
current rcu_barrier_bh() is like this:
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 0);
/*
* The queueing of callbacks in all CPUs must be atomic with
* respect to RCU, otherwise one CPU may queue a callback,
* wait for a grace period, decrement barrier count and call
* complete(), while other CPUs have not yet queued anything.
* So, we need to make sure that grace periods cannot complete
* until all the callbacks are queued.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)RCU_BARRIER_BH, 1);
rcu_read_unlock();
wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
}
The inconsistency of the code and the comments show a bug here.
rcu_read_lock() cannot make sure that "grace periods for RCU_BH
cannot complete until all the callbacks are queued".
it only make sure that race periods for RCU cannot complete
until all the callbacks are queued.
so we must use rcu_read_lock_bh() for rcu_barrier_bh().
like this:
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
......
rcu_read_lock_bh();
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)RCU_BARRIER_BH, 1);
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
......
}
and also rcu_barrier() rcu_barrier_sched() are implemented like this.
it will bring a lot of duplicate code. My patch uses another way to
fix this bug, please see the comment of my patch.
Thank Paul E. McKenney for he rewrote the comment.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-17 13:40:30 +07:00
|
|
|
atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
|
2008-07-16 04:02:33 +07:00
|
|
|
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)type, 1);
|
rcupdate: fix bug of rcu_barrier*()
current rcu_barrier_bh() is like this:
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 0);
/*
* The queueing of callbacks in all CPUs must be atomic with
* respect to RCU, otherwise one CPU may queue a callback,
* wait for a grace period, decrement barrier count and call
* complete(), while other CPUs have not yet queued anything.
* So, we need to make sure that grace periods cannot complete
* until all the callbacks are queued.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)RCU_BARRIER_BH, 1);
rcu_read_unlock();
wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
}
The inconsistency of the code and the comments show a bug here.
rcu_read_lock() cannot make sure that "grace periods for RCU_BH
cannot complete until all the callbacks are queued".
it only make sure that race periods for RCU cannot complete
until all the callbacks are queued.
so we must use rcu_read_lock_bh() for rcu_barrier_bh().
like this:
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
......
rcu_read_lock_bh();
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)RCU_BARRIER_BH, 1);
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
......
}
and also rcu_barrier() rcu_barrier_sched() are implemented like this.
it will bring a lot of duplicate code. My patch uses another way to
fix this bug, please see the comment of my patch.
Thank Paul E. McKenney for he rewrote the comment.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-17 13:40:30 +07:00
|
|
|
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
|
|
|
|
complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
|
2006-03-23 18:00:19 +07:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* rcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu() callbacks complete.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void rcu_barrier(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_STD);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-12-12 15:37:05 +07:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-13 02:21:05 +07:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* rcu_barrier_bh - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu_bh() callbacks complete.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_BH);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* rcu_barrier_sched - Wait for in-flight call_rcu_sched() callbacks.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_SCHED);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
void __init rcu_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-26 03:08:24 +07:00
|
|
|
__rcu_init();
|
2005-04-17 05:20:36 +07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|